Fantasy Aficionados discussion
Epic Fantasy
>
Steven Erikson's Malazon Book of the Fallen Series
message 51:
by
[deleted user]
(new)
Jan 14, 2011 05:22PM
Agreed, bud
reply
|
flag

People I know who have read the whole series say it doesn't jump the shark at all. I think the fact that the books cover more or less self-contained stories lowers that likelihood.
Also, have you read Ian Esselmont (Erikson's co-creator of that world?). Night of Knives is good. Havne't read Return of the Crimson Guard.
No, I don't think they've come anywhere near jumping the shark in my opinion. I've enjoyed each and every novel though I thought Deadhouse Gates was the best by far. I've read them all and re-read the first four. I've also read Esselmont's novels as well. You nailed it, Esselmont's the co-creator of the Malazan world. They originally tried to build the Malazan world as a RPG and then a motion picture but when they couldn't get either to fly, Erikson made Gardens of the Moon into a novel. Obviously that's working out pretty peachy ;)
I've read both of Esslemont's books as well and enjoyed em both. Im looking forward to Stonewielder...wish they hadn't pushed back the publication date but as long as he doesn't go all Martin, we'll be okay
I've read both of Esslemont's books as well and enjoyed em both. Im looking forward to Stonewielder...wish they hadn't pushed back the publication date but as long as he doesn't go all Martin, we'll be okay

Gardens of the Moon would make a really cool Syfy channel mini-series, if they did it properly.
And there's the rub...can you see them Really doing it well? As much as I'd like to hope they would after the Dresden debacle I have little to no faith

But you're right, they'll probably screw it up. I did not like Gormenghast (one of my favorite book series), though in fairness I think BBC actually made that, though Syfy showed it.
I did think they did a pretty good job with Dune, however.

Also, the books serve well enough as stand-alone novels. You are best served reading them in chronological order, I suppose, ..."
I can do stand-alones, I think that's the only reason I've been able to read all of Andre Norton's Witch World.
Ok, yall have convinced me;-) I'll put book 1 in my TBR list.

MrsJoseph, I don't know if I will read the rest. The sex kind of squicked me out and those books are long!!! Maybe someday. I heard the newest series is not as good.


The sex is kinda wild, but I enjoy a little smut now & then. One of the things I love about Carey's work in this series is that her characters change as they age. Book 1 has the most sex since she is about 18 y/o and rather callow. Book 2 has less sex than book 1 and book 3 less than book 2.


I have to admit that I loved this series. I've read the first 6 several times. There are some rough spots, but great characters and wonderful plots.


:( There is a special place in hell for people who lose other people's books...


lol!

Erikson is an archaeologist by trade, and it bleeds into the history of his world. As the series progresses he builds his world by adding layers of history that really provides the framework of a massive and ambitious story.
I have been reading fantasy novels my entire life and I have never read anything like this series. It almost makes me think of watching HBOs The Wire - you can't watch a single episode in isolation and expect it to tell a traditional story with a beginning, middle, and end; you have to watch a full season, at the very least, to see how everything ties together. Characters in Erikson's world develop over several volumes and at very different paces.
I feel like I'm rambling, but a previous poster said that it breaks the rules of traditional fantasy, and it does. Give it a chance, there really is nothing really quite like this.


But then, everyone who has ever read one of my posts knows what an Erikson fanatic I am..lol


You know, Steve and I have talked over presenting those stories from the beginning of the Empire: K & D’s first meeting and such. We agreed that I might tackle them as novellas just like his Bauchelain and Korbel Broach pieces. They’d be non-sequential moments from the histories showing various encounters and pivotal moments. All will have to wait however, until I finish the last two of my first six for Bantam.





I agree Clay-I was excited about Esslemont's answer because Dancer has really come to be one of my fave characters, glad to hear we will see more of him!
One of the forums here, Fantasy book club series, is starting a read of the whole series, so there is a lot of discussing happening!


my question is why does a god have to walk with a cane?


And once you hit book 6 or 7, the grandeur of what is taking place in front of you begins to reveal itself bit by bit. Sure the ride up to that point is still awesome, but the true depth and interconnectedness of the plot really begins to sink in the further you get. And by the time you hit book 9 (which is part 1 of the final chapter), you are so completely immersed in this fantastically crafted world and are so intimately acquainted with Erikson's principal cast that you can actually feel what these incredibly complex characters are dealing with - not to mention finding yourself arriving at plot conclusions simultaneously with these amazing characters which you've come to know and love/hate.
I would say note taking isn't a must, but it may help. Each book includes a few maps and a lengthy dramatis personae of characters - but sometimes the descriptions are woefully brief causing a bit of anxiety as you return to a character who might have been absent for a couple of volumes. However, Erikson does a good job of reminding you, within the narrative, who this character is and why they're important even if you've forgotten them.
Can you tell I love this series??? lol. While it may not be for everyone, I'm of the opinion that what Steven has managed to accomplish in this rapidly written (ten 600 or 700 [plus] page books published within a decade and a year) series is nothing short of mind blowing. But despite all of that, it's - at it's heart - still nothing more than a fantastic story. To everyone who sticks with it, enjoy!

Also, it's been a year or so since I've read Gardens, so should I reread it before giving the series a second go?
I've always said that Deadhouse Gates was Erikson's finest work. Clay, I'm a total fan as well (if you couldn't tell by my obsessive notekeeping...lol) and I agree wholeheartedly that Erikson's ability to interweave storylines across books is nothing short of amazing. Hell even if your fav character dies that doesn't even Begin to mean they're out of the picture...lol. Jason, back to Deadhouse Gates. It's the book that made me really fall in love with the series. I hated the way Gardens of the Moon just threw you right into the middle of a world that you were apparently supposed to just know but in Deadhouse Gates, Erikson really does a great job of drawing you in at a steadier pace. The story of Coltaine's march (the Chain of Dogs) is nothing short of Epic. I mean you can really use the word to it's fullest extent when describing the tale. I'd highly recommend you read it even if you never pick up the rest of the series

Deadhouse Gates is a better novel than Gardens was. And yes, it was definitely the book that pulled me in. But keep in mind that many of the characters introduced in DG will be new - and only a few return from GotM. Most of what occured in GotM isn't followed up on until Memories of Ice. So, feel free to give Deadhouse Gates a whirl without re-reading GotM. If DG ends up grabbing you, you can always re-read GotM before moving on to MoI without hurting the continuity much at all. But if you remember the basics of GotM, a re-read may not even be necessary at all.
I wouldn't want you to miss Deadhouse Gates though. It's one of my all time favorites of the series. Coltaine's Trail of Tears is really something that has to be witnessed in Erikson's words. To me, it was equal parts Blackhawk Down and Dances with Wolves with a healthy dose of epic Greek Tragedy thrown in. I know, I know, an odd analogy for a fantasy story ... read it. You'll see it.
Lol no you totally nailed it Clay! Everytime I read the book I think Blackhawk Down as well. It's just amazing. The Historian is my fav character though Coltaine is just amazing. I agree with Clay, Jason. You don't need to reread Gardens to fully enjoy Deadhouse Gates. Jump right in!

And Jason, I'm excited FOR you. The first read of DG is an awsome ride!

I'm sticking with it because I find hints of something great here. Steven Erikson draws you down into the setting so that I swear my shoes must be dirty. Anyhow, Glad I saw this thread.

I haven't really checked it out much because I want to read the series first. But it looks pretty cool.
Here's the link:
http://www.tor.com/blogs/2010/04/mala...


But reading both authors isn't a requirement to fully understanding the world. Esslemont follows a slightly different cast of characters with a few peripheral characters merging between the two. And while they both tell different tales, the two authors' books definitely complement each other well. If Erikson's MBotF sucks you in like it did me, I would highly recommend Esslemont's books as added flavor.

I'm in the same boat as you, Jason, except that I kinda hated Gardens. Ok maybe not hated.. I was just mad at it. It took me so long to get through it because I just wasn't interested.. But I kept pushing because people said it would pay off.. But then when it didn't, it made me angry at the book. I had never been so happy to finally finish something!
I, too, have been considering trying Deadhouse... I think eventually I will... I just have to get the motivation to make myself. I want to love the series, I really do.. I'm afraid I'll be disappointed again :(

I've been participating in the TOR reread since it started, and it's been really helpful as well.
I have to say for me that Memories of Ice is my favorite. I literally started bawling three different times when I read that book.
Here on GoodReads, the Fantasy Book series is doing a series read on this.

Sorry if we are being confusing! Steven Erikson wrote the Malazan series based on a role-playing game that he and his friend Ian Cameron Esslemont played. IIRC, They wrote a screenplay based on this that never was made. Erikson took that and turned it into Gardens of the Moon and ultimately into the Malazan series.
Then Esslemont started his own series, also based on the game, but it was planned between them what stories each would do so there wasn't overlap. So there is another Malazan series starting with the book Night of Knives that is an independent series, yet set in the same world
Books mentioned in this topic
Night of Knives (other topics)Stonewielder (other topics)
The Crippled God (other topics)
Return of the Crimson Guard (other topics)
Orb Sceptre Throne (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Ian C. Esslemont (other topics)Steven Erikson (other topics)
Ian C. Esslemont (other topics)