Error Pop-Up - Close Button Sorry, you must be a member of this group to do that.

Goodreads Librarians Group discussion

35 views

Comments Showing 1-7 of 7 (7 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Elaine (last edited May 17, 2010 04:31PM) (new)

Elaine (elainereads) | 57 comments Wild Thing

Is this the correct way of including multiple titles? What if there are different authors?


message 2: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
I believe that's the agreed upon format, yes. Both authors and stories should be in the order presented in the book, I'd think.


message 3: by Elaine (new)

Elaine (elainereads) | 57 comments Thanks. I'll make a note of it. I have a lot of anthologies.


message 4: by mlady_rebecca (new)

mlady_rebecca | 591 comments rivka wrote: "I believe that's the agreed upon format, yes. Both authors and stories should be in the order presented in the book, I'd think."

Agreed.


message 5: by This Is Not The Michael You're Looking For (last edited May 17, 2010 09:46PM) (new)

This Is Not The Michael You're Looking For | 949 comments "Wild Thing (Includes: Warriors of Poseidon, #2; The Guardians, #3)"

Huh, I don't think I've ever stumbled across that before. Is that the agreed upon format? I would have thought the contents would go in the description in this case.

Also, is "Includes:" actually necessary desirable?


message 6: by mlady_rebecca (new)

mlady_rebecca | 591 comments If you want more examples, this shelf contains a bunch of anthologies that include pieces that are part of a series:

http://www.goodreads.com/review/list/...

It does look like the keyword "includes" is inconsistently used.

Personally, I like the series information front and center, becasue it's likely I bought the anthology only because I follow one of those series.


message 7: by Sandra (new)

Sandra | 31494 comments I much prefer the series info in the title field, like mlady rebecca, that would be why I bought the book.


back to top