Harry Potter vs Twilight discussion
Twilight vs Harry Potter
>
Dumbledore VS Edward Cullen! ^^
and Harry was the youngest seeker in forever! first years aren't even allowed brooms, let alone on the quittich team. maybe an alliance...but not friends.
well, still this is a dumbledore vs edward, not harry. We did not do harry vs edward because in the other group everyone freaked out and made up random excuses so harry would win, when he obviously woudn't
Of course he would, how could he lose?but anyway yes, this is Dumbledore vs. Edward, which is kinda dumb since Everybody knows Dumbledore would win.
Dumbledore probably knows everything Harry does so he would win definitely, plus he's almost as old as Edward...
It ispossible for DUmbledore to win, but if Edward took his wand (which would be really easy) Dumbledore would be a helpless old man.
no, Edward doesn't have any magical powers...oh, wait, I get it. But if the fight was back when Edward was human, he would be a helpless sick boy.
Dumbledore is one of the most powerful wizards ever. few got up to his level, Grinidiwald, Voldemort.And in the books he can do some magic without a wand.
If it was when Edward was human Dumbledore wouldn't be born, but the thing is, if Dumbledore had no wand he would lose, and edward could be there in a second to steal his wand.
I'm with Andy. Edward is amazing. And you need to know what a twit is in order to call an all powerful amazing vampire one. Just so you know. I think Dumbledore could win. But without his wand, he's useless, just like all wizards. Eddy would win.
Dumbledore is a practiced Occlumens. I think that would count against Edward- it's basically the same thing. Dumbledore would Apparate away in a second.
"I'm with Andy. Edward is amazing. And you need to know what a twit is in order to call an all powerful amazing vampire one. Just so you know. I think Dumbledore could win. But without his wand, he's useless, just like all wizards. Eddy would win."I'm with the sensible crowd. Edward is a twit. and i don't need to know what it is to call a pedo stalker fictional vampire that. just so YOU know. Dumbledore would definitely win. even without his wand, he is amazing, just like all wizards. Albus would win.
It doesn't matter, anyway, because in dying, Dumbledore would probably have twisted and planned it so it comes out the better for him and his side.
yup yup, his mind works in strange ways!
Maggie, you said that he would be able to apparate away, but he wouldn't be able to on Hogwarts ground.And Kimathy, what is a Twit? Is it just another one of those words you use?
If it's at Hogwarts, there's a whole new set of arguments...
twitPronunciation: (twit), [key:]
—n. Informal.
an insignificant or bothersome person.
prat [præt:]n
Slang an incompetent or ineffectual person: often used as a term of abuse
[probably special use of C16 prat buttocks, of unknown origin:]
ya, there ya go, Only one person fits that bill, and i think you know who that is.... (Dumbledore)
Edward is a secret in his world. Dumbledore is famous and did a lot for wizarding kind. Who's insignificant NOW?
Edward is attracted to Bella because of her scent..... creepy
Dumbledore is just as secret as Edward. Both keep their kind a secret from all of the mortals/muggles of the world. Dumbledore is famous in his small group, just as Edward is famous in his. And Edward is famous in his...because he is one of the yellow eyes.
yes but dumbledore is the one of the three most powerful wizards ever and Edwards main problem is losing Bella. Dumbeldores is killing the most evil wizard ever..... DUMBELDORE WINS!
Dumbledore may win, but only if he's still got his wand.
he does, because if he didn't than Dumbledore wouldn't be born.
Laurena wrote: "Maggie, you said that he would be able to apparate away, but he wouldn't be able to on Hogwarts ground.And Kimathy, what is a Twit? Is it just another one of those words you use?"
si
Andy wrote: "he does, because if he didn't than Dumbledore wouldn't be born."and why would he not be born?
Because Edward was turned into a vampire in like 1901. Dumbledore's not that old.
I don't think so. I think he just looks it.
Ok, so she does, but we're doing it during the time when ed's a vamp.That just makes me hate dumbledore more, he's so unrealistic, it bugs me, and now he's 150 years old! That's so dumb.
Andy wrote: "Ok, so she does, but we're doing it during the time when ed's a vamp.That just makes me hate dumbledore more, he's so unrealistic, it bugs me, and now he's 150 years old! That's so dumb."
wow.......youre saying that a one hundred fifty year old powerful wizard(explains y he is so old) is unrealistic, but a mindreading, sparkling, gay, fairy vampire is realistic and could beat him in a fight....... WOW thats just sad
no but she said that her wizards are human, when no human could live that long. Also, Meyer said that her vampires live forever. Ok, that's fine, and she also said that they sparkled and such. Edward is not gay, you just want him to be.
PS- Harry's Firebolt goes upwards of 200 mph and turns on a dime...