The History Book Club discussion
NAPOLEONIC WARS
>
9. HF - MASTER AND COMMANDER - CHAPTER 9 (309- 335) (06/28/10 - 07/04/10) ~ No spoilers, please
date
newest »


In port, Jack has much to annoy him. Reporting to the Ellis' on how their son is doing, things he ordered not coming in, his father planning to remarry, and Mrs. Harte gone away. Dillon is still not happy and always on edge. Stephen wishes he could do something to restore good relations between Dillon and Jack. The purser, disliking Jack's methods, is planning to transfer to another ship. Jack spirits rise with a plan to visit Mrs. Harte, but something goes wrong because he returns too quickly and quite dispirited.

A couple of you last week said you thought, overall, Jack was a good captain. I agree for the most part. I am amazed at Jack's attention to detail while at sea, his unrelenting drilling of his crew to improve abilities and efficiency, his knack for playing a part with the whole ship, and his ability to get into another commander's mind and second-guess other ships.
But those are all qualities that are most useful when Jack is in sole command of one ship, without the need to connecting or coordinating with other allies. I think Lord Keith has a point that Jack needs to be able to reliably take orders. If he is going to operate as part of a fleet, a group of ships together in battle, the other commanders need to know he'll play his assigned part and not go off to do his own thing.
I imagine this is similar for any military position. Yes, you want your men to have some ability to think on their own. But you need men who can and will take orders. We saw this a lot when discussing The Killer Angels. Sometimes your part in the battle plan isn't really glorious, isn't what seems important from your perspective. But someone has to do it, or the battle is lost.
So the question is, can Jack learn this? Is he the kind of commander/captain who can do it? He has so little respect for the man above him, I'm not sure.


Some interesting and very good points you have raised. I think that Jack, who knows both the good and bad points of Navy discipline having come up through the ranks will become the commander required however only time will tell :)
He fully understands that rigid but fair & just discipline is required on a fighting ship but I also think he is aware that sometimes a commander must bend the rules to obtain the result required and that is where his luck comes into play. Men need to be lead by a commander who inspires their trust. He must show good judgement and be seen to take an interest in his men’s welfare fully knowing that at time he will be placing them in harms way. You cannot always fight a battle by going by the’ book’ and the military understands this, allowing leaders to use their initiative and discretion.
If he bends the rules and does not obtain the result then he is open to the full brunt of naval discipline and will be court martialled however if he gets away with it then the Commodore will turn a blind eye to his transgression:
“The phrase to turn a blind eye is attributed to an incident in the life of Admiral Horatio Nelson.
Nelson was blinded in one eye early in his Royal Navy career. In 1801, during the Battle of Copenhagen cautious Admiral Sir Hyde Parker, in overall command of the British forces, sent a signal to Nelsons forces giving him discretion to withdraw. Naval orders were transmitted via a system of signal flags at that time. When this order was given to the more aggressive Nelson's attention, he lifted his telescope up to his blind eye, said "I really do not see the signal", and his forces continued to press home the attack.
It is a popular misconception that he disobeyed orders, but as the signal simply gave him discretion to withdraw he was not doing so. Even at the time, some people who were on his ship with him may have been under the impression that he was disobeying orders, since they were not aware of the exact content of the signal.” - Wikipedia

“….....'Yes, I had taken your point, and am much obliged to you for your attention in –'
A dark form drifted from the sombre cliff-face on the starboard beam – an enormous pointed wingspan: as ominous as fate. Stephen gave a swinish grunt, snatched the telescope from under jack’s arm, elbowed him out of the way and squatted at the rail, resting the glass on it and focusing with great intensity.
‘A bearded vulture! It is a bearded vulture!’ he cried. ‘A young beared vulture.’
‘Well’, said Jack instantly – not a second’s hesitation – ‘I dare say he forgot to shave this morning.’ His red face crinkled up, his eyes diminishing to a bright blue slit and he slapped his thigh, bending in such a paroxysm of silent mirth, enjoyment and relish that for all the Sophie’s strict discipline the man at the wheel could not withstand the infection and burst out in a strangled ‘Hoo, hoo, hoo’, instantly suppresed by the quartermaster at the con.”
The image of Stephen grabbing Jack’s telescope and then pushing him out of the way to look at a bird was priceless :)

I think the key concept here is discipline. Can Jack develop the personal discipline to play a roll at times, or does he always desire be get into the fight.
As a private vessel who is only out for their own interests, Jack is extremely effective. If he wants to be a Post Captain, he will need to learn to play his role in the overall Navel policy. I'm interested to see if he can do that.



Wikipedia has some good stuff about what a post-captain was: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-cap...
Basically, a ship that was too large or important to be run by a mere commander (which is what Jack is now in the book) was run by a post-captain. For example, frigates and ships of the line were usually commanded by post-captains. Once one made post-captain the next step was admiral. Admirals were made strictly from the most senior on the post-captain list. Hence Jack says on page 312, "From then onwards all you have to do is to remain alive to be an admiral in time."
More than that, what does such an accomplishment mean to a man in the Royal Navy of the time? Jack tries to explain it to Stephen. It isn't just that one is officially a captain, or that one can shift one's epaulette to the other should. It is the height of ambition. Jack sums it up by saying, "you are there!"
Does Stephen understand Jack's ambition? Does it make sense to you? Do we have positions like this today, whether in the navy or elsewhere, where once you make a certain point you no longer need to worry about your performance?


Jack certainly values having a good reputation "in the service," even beyond its use for promotion. And, having known want, he is definitely fond of prize-money. But he also, I think, takes an almost childish delight in doing well what he does well, and what he does very well, is direct a ship.
Agreed, that what he does less well, is take direction, operate within boundaries set by someone else, and suffer the petty injustices inflicted by those of senior rank. I think he has been doing a good job of leading, developing a good esprit de corps on his ship (until confounded by Dillon's funk ober the United Irishmen padre). But he is not a great follower.

Jack is in a difficult spot. He is reprimanded for doing what another Captain did to him regarding the treatment of prisoners, yet he's the only one who has to stand responsible. He has no one higher up trumpeting his abilities. It appears that Jack feels he's out there on his own and his career plans are fading.


And he can read his ship, and the other ship, so well. And that taking orders thing. In many ways I can sympathize with it. Don't we all find it hard to take unfair orders?


Jack also expected promotion because he was the surviving senior Lieutenant of a distinguished ship at the Battle of the Nile. It was a custom to promote the senior Lt after a ship had distinguished itself in battle. The fact that he had started as the 4th Lt and the three seniors had died in the battle did not diminish his expectation that he should have been promoted.

Books mentioned in this topic
The Killer Angels (other topics)Master & Commander (other topics)
Authors mentioned in this topic
Michael Shaara (other topics)Patrick O'Brian (other topics)
Welcome to the historical fiction discussion of Master and Commander by Patrick O'Brian.
This is the reading assignment for week nine - (June 28th, 2010 to July 4th, 2010)
This is the second historical fiction group selected book.
We will open up a thread for each week's reading. Please make sure to post in the particular thread dedicated to those specific chapters and page numbers to avoid spoilers if you are catching up.
This book was kicked off on May 3rd.
This discussion is being led by assisting moderator of historical fiction - Elizabeth S.
We always enjoy the participation of all group members. Amazon, Barnes and Noble and other noted on line booksellers do have copies of the book and shipment can be expedited. The book can also be obtained easily at your local library, or on your Kindle.
This thread opens up Monday, June 28th for discussion. This is a non spoiler thread.
Welcome,
~Bentley
TO ALWAYS SEE ALL WEEKS' THREADS SELECT VIEW ALL