The Sword and Laser discussion
E-readers. Am I the only one that doesnt get them?
date
newest »


On a side note I re-read my 1st post and realized I sounded whiny. Sorry about that everybody who read it :).
How many people own an e-reader? Be it kindle,nook,or other? And what do you love about it?
I love being able to have hundreds of books, magazines and other content at my fingertips at any moment!

We are getting her an iPad because she is going in for surgery on her spine this summer and will be in bed for a month and will need a multi-entertainment device, so I may inherent the Nook! Usually the hand-me-downs go the other way! :0)

1) I needed to buy at least 1 more bookshelf
2) I was starting to do a lot more travel for my job.
I ended up buying a Kindle2 then, before my travel really started. Though I can see that they're not for everybody, I think that I am the right target for them (reads a lot, travels a lot). I love my Kindle.
I'm not yet sold on the iPad as an e-reader; I do like the e-ink on the eyes. But I LOVE that I can read a book on my Kindle at home, sync the location of where I've left off, and then pick up reading again while in grocery lines or while waiting at doctor's offices on the iPhone using the Kindle app. I think the synchronization with the cloud is the best least-touted feature of the Kindle out there.

Kindle should be available in Targets starting this Sunday. Plus, Amazon allows you to return Kindle within 30 days if you don't like it (http://www.amazon.com/gp/help/custome...).

I feel like, though it's been a number of years, we're still in the first generation of these things. However, unlike a lot of other people, I don't want my e-reader to do anything except display text. I'd love if somebody using an open format would come out with a device that was basically a screen, meaning no LCD or keyboard. Focus on the speed of the page refresh and use Amazon's model of wireless downloads. I'd even pay the high entrance fee we currently have for something like that.


Exactly! I think I would jump on a device like that in a second. All screen, no visible keyboard (pullout one = ok), and get that refresh rate handled. I really like the E-ink display but that refresh is horrendous. Totally jars my eyes out of focus. I assume that it just takes getting used to but I don't know if I want to.
I have been looking at these as a gift for my wife for mothers day but haven't been able to pull the trigger yet due to the issues mentioned in earlier posts. Maybe I will when I can actually touch a Kindle.
terpkristin: I didn't know about the wireless sync feature. That sounds awesome!!!
Vance: Sorry to hear about the surgery. Hope nothing to serious and all goes well. And that is what I see an iPad as perfect for. I don't know if i could sit there on the couch and hold that thing for extended periods of time as a book replacement.

I agree with the problem of having to rebuy books. I really wish that you could buy the paper book and get an e version for free.

As far as e-ink displays - I think the one on the Nook and Kindle are incredible - especially in sunlight if you read outside. Being able to pick up another book anytime I want has turned me from a heavy reader into a voracious reader.
The only negative so far is that you can't read it during takeoff and landing!
Regards, Jim

I am not, however, a fan of e-ink - contrast too low (black on white? ha! more like light gray on darker gray), page turns too slow. I'm close enough to a page-at-a-glance reader that the screen on anything short of the Kindle DX or the big Sony is a bit smaller than I would prefer. I"ve stayed away from the Kindle precisely because of Amazon's DRM lock-in.
I am looking forward to getting an iPad, as I have use for the other things it does in addition to serving as an e-reader. We've got several of them floating around my workplace, and I haven't had problems with the screen, preferring it to any e-ink screen I've seen.
Yes, it's all fairly new tech, and I'm sure that newer versions will come along that will, in retrospect, make us all say, "How could we ever have thought that earier version was so great?" It's what always happens with technology, and if you wait for the perfect gadget, the next generation is always whispering from around the corner, "I"ll be soooooo much better. You don't want that old thing." So you keep putting it off and never get one.


The convenience is incredible -- and there are more than a few books that are out of print or hard to find in paper that can be found electronically. And found easily. Also, closing in on 60 with multiple cross-country, cross-continent moves and their attendant culling of books (my wife is right, we can't keep them all -- but where oh where is my original Venus Equilateral?) and shelves and downsizing...arrgh. If I could convert all of my books to electronic versions, I would.
The advantages of the e-book outweigh any of its disadvantages for me. Give it a hands-on try at Target when it goes on sale.
It would be good to get some test results from any iPad owners, too, on how it really stands up to lengthy reading sessions. Some have said the brightness would get tiring, but, would it? Did it? I'm not looking or an excuse to buy an iPad. Of course not.
(And thanks to the S&L-er who suggested E.E.Knight's Wolf series. Great! Of course...read it on the Kindle.)

ouch....thats a very very small screen....ouch

The Kindle is great and if I didn't think the next generation will be even better, I'd buy a Kindle for myself. For now, I'll just use my wife's while she is in town.

I love going to the local used bookstores or waiting for Borders to release those 40% off coupons, so I rarely ever pay over $10 for a book anyway. Plus, this is one of the few things I currently do in my life where I'm not dependent on having a charged battery or a screen in front of me, so I cherish that as well. I lend books to people often, so that's another problem I have with e-readers. I may get an e-reader when they get cheap enough, if only for the free content one can read on it, but I'm probably too much of a fan of paper to go completely away from it.


Strangely I hasn't stopped me buying books altogether. I brought a Jamie Oliver cookbook the other day. I don't think using a Kindle in the kitchen with a cook book on it would be much help, also the photography is just gorgeous. I also brought a series of travel books that I love as hardback as they were to get signed by the authors. Can't see them signing my Kindle lol

=]


Cannot recommend the Kindle enough just the same.



Best Regards, Jim
Charles wrote: "I've never gotten the "slow refresh on page turn" or "ugly page turn" arguments. My Kindle displays the next page twice as fast as I could turn a page, with the bonus of no hand or curved text slid..."

I find the e-ink screen superb for reading both in sunlight and artificial light. It causes me no eyestrain.
Now, the format issues and DRM are quite valid, especially for books that you want to keep indefinitely. However, the format called epub is trying to emerge as a standard. It can be used on many different devices (Sony, Nook, ipad) except Kindle. Also, there are sources that specialize in ebooks without DRM, like Smashwords.com.
Also, I've read that DRM is really easy to crack. I suppose you could find out how by googling it because I don't personally know how.
As for printed books, I prefer them for many nonfiction books, especially those with charts and photos. Also, cookbooks are a must in print because I don't want to be splashing and flouring my electronics.

Funny thing, last night I was at services (Reform Jewish) and we're very liturgical. Our new liturgy book is pretty big and I was sort of wishing I could just have it on my Nook. It may happen in the Reform movement someday but given that more observant folks don't use electronics on Shabbos I'm not sure if it will ever reach the Conservative or or certainly the Orthodox congregations. It wouldn't surprise me if some folks are already bringing their Bibles to Church on e-readers.

I'd probably recommend to anyone but the most hard-core readers to pick up an iPad, as for a little bit more money it does so much more. But for pure readers, an e-reader is lighter, cheaper, easier to read and smaller to fit in your bag.
My wife is currently stealing my Kindle since she finds a larger print size much easier for her to read. I think I might have to bite the bullet and get another one soon. Waiting to see what the new Nook Wi-fi has in store and what Amazon will do once B&N announces their new product.




Because of that I need a device that would hold many eBooks and more(can't have enough :)
With that said, I am almost addicted to eBooks, so I would read them any where, on anything and in any way I have to, so what I have to say on this topic means little but I am saying it anyway because, I love eBooks. :)
I think its not the device as much as its the software. All I would say, it can not be as customizable as it should be and the only solution is to make your own app.

I think the eyestrain is more of a psychological thing IF your eyes or your sitting positions are fine. Because its straining only after you try to concentrate but why would you concentrate when you can enlarge the fonts?

My primary reason for the Sony was that at the time the Kindle was not available in South Africa, of course that changed a week after receiving it LOI

I hate when that happens. :)

I'm with you. I have a nook and the screen refresh is a bit slower. Still, it happens in less than a second. Maybe people are just faster than me, but I find that physically turning a paper page and focusing on the top of that new page takes at least half a second. That would mean that my reader is taking an extra .25 of a second to refresh. I can live with that to never be caught without something to read.


hmmm...wonder if that is a format problem with that specific e-reader? or is that just the book itself, does a physical copy have the same things?


Now if I could hit a button and iphone, or ipad could switch to an e-ink mode I would read 100% of my books on it, until then I will remain e-readerless.
(yes I know this is at least a few years away)


This technology already exists, it just hasn't come out yet. Check out http://www.pixelqi.com/ they have developed a display that is both reflective and transmissive I would love to convert an iPad with this display technology.


You'll love it - Friend B&N and Nook on Facebook or follow them on Twitter. They release a lot of good insider stuff. If you are in store, check your Nook for coupons - they have free food/coffee coupons quite often.
Best Regards, Jim


Assuming you have friends that read the same genres as you, your book collection grows pretty quickly, and you always have someone around to chat about the book with.
I have looked at 3 different Sony ones, The Nook, and the iPad (want to see a kindle but cant get my hands on one yet, how does amazon expect most people to buy 1 if they cant even touch it first?).
Any E-ink display looks ok but the screen is only about 1/3rd of the device and that wouldn't work for me if I am trying to read. The slow refresh rate when you turn a page is horrible and distracts me from of whatever i am trying to concentrate on. And the touch technology on the Nook is so frustratingly slow to respond.
The iPad books were beautiful and I really loved the page turn and dictionary look up. But can you really read off of that screen for hours? I wouldn't be able to. And the dang thing was so heavy that trying to hold it and read a book would be impossible for me long term.
And since there is no de-facto standard for e-books yet you are locked into whatever device you bought them on. If you want to upgrade...Sorry you have to re-buy your books!!! Our DRM says you cant do what you want to with YOUR BOOK!!! Maybe im the only one but I am going to stick with paper and audio books for the foreseeable future.