The Doctor Rules!!!!!! discussion
Randomness
>
Just Chat
I can chat too! *waves at you and Smith*
17.
And yep. Lunch time. Then choir for about an hour and a half, then i have a free period again.
And yep. Lunch time. Then choir for about an hour and a half, then i have a free period again.
Everyone has their own song, you too.
You sing how you sing. You're fine the way you are. :)

No, don't cry! (For some reason i feel i am glad i can't see the picture..)
Yeah, so do I...It's just NOT my best friend. Still can't see pic.
It's technology. We can't expect it to do exactly what we want. Even the Doctor has problems with the TARDIS. *shrug*
Oh! Hm...Lemme see....Are you on SOHCAHTOA?
And you need FI...Is the line on top by the 90 degree sign supposed to be like that? If it's even, I could help, if not, I'm not sure I remember...Cause in the whole triangle, that's 90d and if it's cut in half, then you divide 90 by 2. So 45d is the left triangle on top. You know how the line opposite the place with the degrees is the O is SOHCAHTOA? Well, you plug it in. You would have 45tan=O/12. You solve from there. That make sense?
But that's only if the line is supposed to be like that...
I don't know what the answer to my way was, but at least you got it! (Again, I'm not a math wizz, but I am boss at simple equations.)
Geometry is after Algebra, then comes Algebra 2.

Our system is weird. We have these books that mix them all up. It's really confusing...

That's how it is here. I'm taking a math though, cause it looks good for colleges.
Ugh...Not sure exactly. It focuses more on the thinking part of the problems and tries to fit them into the real world.

Yeah, I haven't taken it sinse last year and won't see it again until the middle of this one. I don't really pay attentio to what the math is called, I just do it.
...sometimes. I tend to procrastonate.
...sometimes. I tend to procrastonate.
Yep haha
They say not to slack off over and over. I never listened.
They say not to slack off over and over. I never listened.
I likes science. Not the disecting part. But the other stuff. Lit is fun, minus the papers. I would be in an art class, but I don't like being told what to draw and when to draw it.
If you guys are interested: http://orangehuskie.deviantart.com/ga...
That's where I put up my art. If you click on the folders down the left hand side, it will be more organized.
If you guys are interested: http://orangehuskie.deviantart.com/ga...
That's where I put up my art. If you click on the folders down the left hand side, it will be more organized.
I'm better at English than I am math. :P

English was my second best subject, but that was because I always overthought things and would get at least 1-2 things wrong on tests. *GRRR*

A little something for everyone.


Let's pop something into the DVD player and get comfy :D

Oh my GOD! Finished the End of Time and I'm BAWLING...
Books mentioned in this topic
Pretty in Black (other topics)The Boy Who Sneaks in My Bedroom Window (other topics)
The Fiery Heart (other topics)
Newton says that time does not refer to a container in which events and move through. I think he might be wrong.
First off, time was already here before us or anything else, and we are passing through it.
If time were not refering to a container, then how come history tends to repeat itself? Scientists say the universe (to our knowledge) is never ending. Things could come around simply by accident. Maybe not in the exact same way, but it does. Maybe a piece of "time" or "event" in our world went round somewhere else, bounced off a space object perhaps unknown to us, and came back years later. It is said that space time is different than our time here on Earth, so this would make sense. But to move through space, time would need to be in a container. How else is hostory supposed to repeat itself, unless told by the memory of man himself?
To ramble on, if there is more than one galaxy and we are unsure of the size of the universe, could there not be more than one universe with more galaxies? And if you take what I said before on "events" and "objects" bouncing around, plus the chance of there being more than one universe, one might say it is very unlikely time would repeat itself. But consider the fact there is no gravity in space. Well, maybe a galaxy out there DOES have gravity surrounding it and the "event" or "object" in the "container of time" falls in this particular galaxy. Even if there were not gravity on this galaxy unknown, the container would still bounce off something in space, much like an astroid crashing into another partical that throws it off course, and land somewhere with gravity, such as Earth.
Now. Measurments in time. How can someone say we calculate time due to the steady movement of atoms? Maybe the turn of the Earth creates waves and the waves hit the atoms, making them bounce. Gravity causes the planets to orbit, correct? Our particular gravity comes from the sun, a medium sized star. So that causes the planets around the sun with gravity to move, somewhat like magnets. But what makes the planets turn? How does time fit into this? Because we can measure the speed in which we orbit the sun.
So, if the sun is a star, then shouldn't there be other stars in other galaxies with planets have an orbit with possible life?
Here's where I bring in the "big bang." If this happened on Earth, than it more than likely happened elsewhere, too. The possible time container would bounce from planet to planet, with life forms, and time would indeed repeat.
Religions. Most believe God is all-knowing. Well, a majority do. My point is, God would have time set up in a line or "container" of his own.
That may be, but things in history happened in time, so if time has our history, then surely time is some sort of container. (The container isn't exactly...visible, if that makes sense.) Now I must bring in the Doctor, or whoever made him up. The Doctor says time is a big ball of wibbly wobbly timey wimey stuff. But if that were the case, how would you move on? Each period in the "big ball" would have to be like picking up a single piece of sand off the beach. What happens after you have visited all you can? It's pretty much imppossible. This is the only factor I can think of refering to Newton being correct. Otherwise, I think he is wrong.
This is just my thoughts. What do you guys think?