The Mystery, Crime, and Thriller Group discussion
Historical Group Reads
>
Apr/May 2010: The Sweetness at the Bottom of the Pie - Alan Bradley
date
newest »

Many reviews of this book begin with a discussion of the main character, Flavia deLuce, and it is indeed the perfect place to start. Flavia has been described as charming, engaging, scheming, devilishly brilliant, incorrigible, and precocious, an 11-year-old who combines childlike enthusiasm with adult intelligence. She is compared to Harriet the Spy, Hermione Granger, and Nancy Drew with a bit of Wednesday from the Addams Family.
So what are your thoughts on our young heroine?
So what are your thoughts on our young heroine?
I have finished chapter 8, so I am just getting to know Flavia, but I love her already, and I love the way Bradley makes her think and speak. She is dramatic, and melodramatic, as only a precocious 11-year-old girl can be.
I wonder if the author used his own 11-year-old daughter as a model.
I wonder if the author used his own 11-year-old daughter as a model.

I am listening to 'Sweetness at the Bottom of the Pie', about half way through. I am enjoying the story. I think it's the sound of the narrator's voice, but Flavia seems like a full fledged, irritating brat. I really think if I were reading the book, I wouldn't think that she was 'full fledged'. She is a brat, but being a brat is not necessarily bad. I appreicate good natured brats!
The relationship between Flavia and her sisters leave a lot to be desired. I guess that is called sibling rivalry. Flavia probably learned sisterly meanness from her sisters' treatment of her and because of Flavia's intelligence and determination, she gives better than she gets. The girl is also looking for attention.
Flavia is doing a good job at unraveling her father's secrets. At this point in the audiobook there are more questions than answers. I have faith that she will solve the murder while entertaining me with her escapades.
Hi Paula, Yes indeed the narrator's voice can be a big part in the success or failure of an audiobook just like the wrong actor in a role can color the way you view a film.
As for the brattiness of Flavia, my mental voice for her leans more toward the amusing type of precocious kid or at least most of the time. I do think she is sometimes struggling to find her place in a very grown up world all by herself and perhaps her frustration, confusion, or even fear shows through.
As for the brattiness of Flavia, my mental voice for her leans more toward the amusing type of precocious kid or at least most of the time. I do think she is sometimes struggling to find her place in a very grown up world all by herself and perhaps her frustration, confusion, or even fear shows through.

I love her conversation with her father in jail. Flavia hungers for a stronger connection with her father.
Back to listening! I probably should wait until I finish the book before I comment on it.
Paula wrote: "I am listening to 'Sweetness at the Bottom of the Pie', about half way through. I am enjoying the story. I think it's the sound of the narrator's voice, but Flavia..."
I would have a hard time listening to this one, I think. I create such strong images in my head when I'm reading that someone else's interpretation would be jarring. (I like listening to descriptive things, where the interpretation of the characters is less important.)
Having said that, I love the way that Flavia is developing. She has never had to deal with anything so difficult. Everything has been easy for her, manipulating her sisters, getting around people, even her study of chemistry. Now there is a dead body in the cucumber patch, and the answers are not coming in the way she expects them... but she doesn't give up. She applies logic to the problem to carry on.
I would have a hard time listening to this one, I think. I create such strong images in my head when I'm reading that someone else's interpretation would be jarring. (I like listening to descriptive things, where the interpretation of the characters is less important.)
Having said that, I love the way that Flavia is developing. She has never had to deal with anything so difficult. Everything has been easy for her, manipulating her sisters, getting around people, even her study of chemistry. Now there is a dead body in the cucumber patch, and the answers are not coming in the way she expects them... but she doesn't give up. She applies logic to the problem to carry on.


Barbara, I agree with your description of Flavia. I thought the poison ivy lipstick bordered on the criminal! Flavia's sister took it with relatively good humour. After all, that's how the girls relate to one another.
**** Possible Spoilers *****
Paula wrote: "I love her conversation with her father in jail. Flavia hungers for a stronger connection with her father. .."
I'm just reading this part now, Paula. It's a great story that her father tells, isn't it? Very evocative, and so touching the impact it has on Flavia, that hunger you mention.
Paula wrote: "I love her conversation with her father in jail. Flavia hungers for a stronger connection with her father. .."
I'm just reading this part now, Paula. It's a great story that her father tells, isn't it? Very evocative, and so touching the impact it has on Flavia, that hunger you mention.

Most of the adults, except Dogger, don't really seem to know her at all. What a character.
Must keep reading.

Flavia is much wiser now when it comes to the people around her. Her logical, brillant mind allowed her to think and move to action when she was bound and dumped in that hold. Scared though she was. The love of her family and friends saved her. Flavia was a bit surprised over that!
We have all mentioned Flavia's independence and her somewhat unusual relationships with the adults in her life not to mention her abilities and interest in chemistry. This book is set in 1950 in rural England and I am wondering if given the time and place some of her freedoms were more normal than we think would be appropriate for a child today


In chapter 18:
*********Spoilers************
When she comes down from the tower and is "apprehended" by Inspector Hewitt:
The little man's pale blue eyes bulged visibly in their sockets.
'Why, it's only a girl!' he said.
I could have slapped his face.
I think, strangely, that girls in the 1950s might have had more freedom to do certain things, and not felt all the "stranger danger" that we feel today.
Flavia is, in any case, very used to thinking and acting for herself. Only a girl, indeed!
*********Spoilers************
When she comes down from the tower and is "apprehended" by Inspector Hewitt:
The little man's pale blue eyes bulged visibly in their sockets.
'Why, it's only a girl!' he said.
I could have slapped his face.
I think, strangely, that girls in the 1950s might have had more freedom to do certain things, and not felt all the "stranger danger" that we feel today.
Flavia is, in any case, very used to thinking and acting for herself. Only a girl, indeed!

Though I think a lot of it's the love the British seem to have for aristocratic eccentrics!

I thought Alan Bradley was fair about providing clues about the murderer (though I didn't guess who it was) and the snippets about stamp collecting were quite interesting.
SPOILER ALERT
I didn't love the end of the book when Flavia was trapped in the underground pit for such a long time. This part got tedious. This is a small quibble though. Overall, I found the book very enjoyable.
Paula wrote: "A girl would have to be very determined to overcome the social limitations of the 1950's. There were quite a few accomplished woman is the 1950's, though they had to fight harder than today. An 11 ..."
I completely agree that girls would have faced limitations in persuing a career of any kind and especially science in the 50s. I was thinking more about her freedom to bicycle many miles by herself and wander the countryside so freely. Many children today can't seem to venture farther than the fence of their backyard, unfortunately
I completely agree that girls would have faced limitations in persuing a career of any kind and especially science in the 50s. I was thinking more about her freedom to bicycle many miles by herself and wander the countryside so freely. Many children today can't seem to venture farther than the fence of their backyard, unfortunately
That's what I was talking about, Donna. I think parents are more worried now about that sort of thing. I mean even in NYC in the 70s I was wandering around by myself on my bicycle... (where was my mother, and why wasn't she screeching blue murder?) The British countryside was probably safe from that point of view.
Today I wouldn't let my daughter (if I had one) go around by herself, nor my son.
Today I wouldn't let my daughter (if I had one) go around by herself, nor my son.


I've only gotten to the point where the regular librarian isn't there and the substitute filling in tells Flavia about a long ago death. . .what I'm assuming has some bearing on the current murder. . .I'm just not that interested yet. But I hope it gets better.
I just finished. Totally lovely, and I can't wait to read the next one!
********Spoilers***********
I thought the bit with the brain demonstration was just a little over the top, and could have been left as a theoretical problem. If Flavia had arrived at the answer logically by studying her books it would have been much more effective I think.
@Barbara: I didn't mind that bit, as it contrasted with the opening scene and showed her to be just what she is... a young child in deep trouble. At the beginning she seems like an almost grownup, and can get out of anything. At the end everyone gets her... even her sister plants her revenge!
********Spoilers***********
I thought the bit with the brain demonstration was just a little over the top, and could have been left as a theoretical problem. If Flavia had arrived at the answer logically by studying her books it would have been much more effective I think.
@Barbara: I didn't mind that bit, as it contrasted with the opening scene and showed her to be just what she is... a young child in deep trouble. At the beginning she seems like an almost grownup, and can get out of anything. At the end everyone gets her... even her sister plants her revenge!
I was reading some more reviews of this book and did you know that Alan Bradley, he's Canadian, had never visited England before he wrote this book!
I've visited England and the descriptions of the country seem good to me but I know we have some UK natives and residents among the group - so how did he really do?
I've visited England and the descriptions of the country seem good to me but I know we have some UK natives and residents among the group - so how did he really do?

I've visited England and the descriptions of ..."
Very interesting, Donna. I, too, would like to hear from some of the UK members as to how he did.

I think that's the thing I found most impressive about the book is that the narrator FELT 11. That he managed to capture that so consistently was really cool.
Just saw on the Malice Domestic site that The Sweetness at the Bottom of the Pie has won the Agatha Award for the Best First Novel!

I was at the Malice Domestic conference when they announced that The Sweetness at the Bottom of the Pie had won the Agatha Award for Best First Novel. Alan Bradley lives on Malta and is in his 70s, so he didn't travel to the conference. The organizers were able to contact him by email to tell him that he won, though, and he replied with a very gracious note that they read out loud to the attendees.
I'm going to the Festival of Mystery in Oakmont, PA today before heading home, and I can't wait to start reading Nancy Pickard's The Scent of Rain and Lightning: A Novel, which I bought at Malice and they were selling pre-release. Happy reading to you all!
That must have been fun, Beth!
Can you post some information about the festival when you get back? Might be interesting to see some of the "insider" stuff!
Can you post some information about the festival when you get back? Might be interesting to see some of the "insider" stuff!

Wonderful, well deserved!


I am really enjoying the character of Flavia. I am almost finished. Flavia seems so much older than her age. I wonder if it is growing up without Harriet and the fact that she doesn't get along with her sisters. What are other's thoughts on this?

I am really enjoying the character of Flavia. I am almost finished. Flavia seems so much older than her age. I wonder if it is growing up without Harriet and the fact that she..."
Possible Spoiler
I think the author does imply that Flavia has had to mature faster than normal because she is motherless and her dad seems to be clueless about raising his daughters...always wrapped up in his stamps and kind of hazy about what the gals are up to. Flavia has had to fend for herself a lot.
To be fair to the dad, I think he does realize things aren't ideal. In the second book he tells the girls' aunt that "it isn't easy for them" (or words to that effect.)
Flavia's relationship with the sisters is more complex, I think. There's the usual dose of sibling rivalry and sibling friction but I think, underneath all that, the girls care about each other. If I remember correctly (and maybe I don't), the sisters are quite concerned when Flavia is in danger in the latter part of the book.

Most of the discussion here has understandably focused on Flavia but a few posts back Barbara mentions that she thought the author had played fair with the clues but that she did not guess whodunnit.
What did everyone think of Bradley's interpretation of the traditional "English county house murder"?
What did everyone think of Bradley's interpretation of the traditional "English county house murder"?

Can you post some information about the festival when you get back? Might be interesting to see some of the "insider" stuff!"
I posted a bunch of author photos and a summary of the Malice Domestic conference and the Festival of Mystery at my blog: http://bethgroundwater.blogspot.com/
Hi Beth, I was wondering since you are a writer how do you balance developing a strong character like Flavia with keeping true to the mystery form and playing fair with the clues?

I'm a huge believer in playing fair with the reader and providing all the clues they need to solve the mystery somewhere in the book (hopefully in good hiding places!). I also hate it when we've been inside the sleuth's head until s/he discovers who-dunnit, then all of a sudden we aren't privvy to his/her thoughts. My feelings on this usually mean my sleuth doesn't discover who-dunnit until near the end of the book and the reader knows at the same time.
I work very hard at creating realistic characters, and I even devoted a full year to studying characterization techniques before I was published. Readers only care about characters who are three-dimensional and usually want the sleuth to be plucky and determined. I don't think that following the mystery form and playing fair with the reader prevents the author from developing strong characters at all. Only laziness and lack of skill do. It's all a matter of getting to know the characters very well, so well in fact that they start to have conversations with you and each other in your head!
That's good news, Heather. I really loved it and I convinced my husband to read it too, and he's really enjoying it as well.
It is fun, isn't it? This book just cheered me up. I love it when that happens.
I hope the audio has a great reader, which can make all the difference in a book.
I hope the audio has a great reader, which can make all the difference in a book.
It's so nice to see the conversation continuing beyond the "month" of the group read!
Heather, I hope you and your husband enjoy the book as much as we all have.
Hayes and Heather, please let us know what the hubbies have to say about it. I would be interested in the male perspective.
Heather, I hope you and your husband enjoy the book as much as we all have.
Hayes and Heather, please let us know what the hubbies have to say about it. I would be interested in the male perspective.
I think he's having trouble with the translation. There have been a few mistakes (Italian editor was AWOL, I fear) that have interfered with understanding of some small points, which is too bad. Otherwise he is enjoying it.
Just an update on this book.
At Bouchercon this week, The Sweetness at the Bottom of the Pie won both the Macavity Award 2010 and the Barry Award 2010 for the best first novel.
At Bouchercon this week, The Sweetness at the Bottom of the Pie won both the Macavity Award 2010 and the Barry Award 2010 for the best first novel.

At Bouchercon this week, The Sweetness at the Bottom of the Pie won both the Macavity Award 2010 and the Barry Award 2010 for the best first novel."
Good to hear Donna. The rewards are well deserved.

Books mentioned in this topic
The Sweetness at the Bottom of the Pie (other topics)The Sweetness at the Bottom of the Pie (other topics)
The Sweetness at the Bottom of the Pie (other topics)
The Sweetness at the Bottom of the Pie (other topics)
The Scent of Rain and Lightning (other topics)
More...
Note: We are going to have only one discussion thread so please clearly mark spoilers at the beginning of your post or at the point where the spoiler begins.
The Sweetness at the Bottom of the Pie was released in early 2009 and has won the 2007 British Crime Writers’ Association Debut Dagger and the 2009 Dilys Award. It is nominated for the 2009 Agatha Award in the ‘Best First Novel’ category.