Goodreads Librarians Group discussion

55 views
Policies & Practices > Format for series numbering

Comments Showing 1-10 of 10 (10 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by vicki_girl (new)

vicki_girl | 2764 comments For adding the series number to a book, we are supposed to use the following format:

Book Name (Series, #_)
OR
Book Name (First Series Name, #_)(Second Series Name, #_)

However, I have a question regarding books or box sets that contain multiple volumes. My question is which of the following is correct?

Example 1:
1a) Goosebumps Boxed Set #1 (Goosebumps, #1-#4)
OR
1b) Goosebumps Boxed Set #1 (Goosebumps, #1-4)

Example 2:
2a) Goosebumps Monster Edition #1 (Goosebumps, #1, #2, #4)
OR
2b) Goosebumps Monster Edition #1 (Goosebumps, #1, #2, & #4)

Personally I am in favor of 1a and 2a. However, I'm really just looking for consistency.


message 2: by [ JT ] (last edited Apr 06, 2010 08:03AM) (new)

[ JT ] | 51 comments When I have been dealing with boxed sets and omnibus editions, I use 1b.

If the situation warranted, I would then use 2a.

(edit: woops, meant 1b!)


This Is Not The Michael You're Looking For | 949 comments I've always used 1b over 1a. For the case of non-consecutive volumes, though, I can't recall if I've used 2a or 2b.


message 4: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
This Is Not The Michael You're Looking For wrote: "I've always used 1b over 1a."

Agreed. I don't think I have dealt with non-consecutives.


message 5: by vicki_girl (new)

vicki_girl | 2764 comments Okay, it sounds like 1b is the way to go for Example 1. Can we add this to the Librarian Manual? There seems to be a mix among the books I am looking at.

For Example 2, I am specifically working on cleaning up R.L. Stine. Many of his Goosebumps and Fear street books are repackaged and sold as sets, e.g. three or four Goosebumps books that are all vampire-related but not consecutive. Nearly all of the ones I see are following the format of 2a. I will go with that, unless there are objections.


message 6: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
vicki_girl wrote: "Can we add this to the Librarian Manual?"

Sure. We're talking about an extra line or so in the existing text about numbering, yes? Start a new thread in the Manual folder, get some text people can agree on, and I can add it this weekend, most likely.


message 7: by Sherry (new)

Sherry (ssaccoliti) | 601 comments http://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/1...

Is this consistent with this ...

I worked my through some of the goosebumps books, and then got confused with the Omnibus editions.


message 8: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
Seems like it to me.


message 9: by vicki_girl (new)

vicki_girl | 2764 comments I can write something up, but it won't be until next week.


message 10: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
No rush.


back to top