Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
Archived
>
Could we mark resolved problems in "book issues"?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Charmteaser
(new)
Jan 02, 2010 03:00AM

reply
|
flag



The topics are organised in a way that allows users to add an issue quickly and for similar issues to be grouped together. The majority of Librarians will add a comment once they fix an issue

Learning is never waste of time, don't get me wrong. I just think it could be helpful in situations when we want just to fix something.

Jen wrote: "you should make this a poll to have it get more attention!"
Really not necessary or helpful. Poll deleted.
I agree with Paula -- reading "fixed" problems is at least as helpful as unfixed ones. If people really think this is a significant issue, I can create a new folder called "book issues - fixed" or somesuch. So far, I am unconvinced.
I'm perfectly happy to post/pin an FAQ (although I'm not sure how it would be all that distinct from the manual), but someone else (preferably, more than one) would have to write it.
Really not necessary or helpful. Poll deleted.
I agree with Paula -- reading "fixed" problems is at least as helpful as unfixed ones. If people really think this is a significant issue, I can create a new folder called "book issues - fixed" or somesuch. So far, I am unconvinced.
I'm perfectly happy to post/pin an FAQ (although I'm not sure how it would be all that distinct from the manual), but someone else (preferably, more than one) would have to write it.

Really not necessary or helpful. Poll deleted.
"
I am sorry for creating the poll, I just wanted to give people a way to tell if it's for them a significant issue... The voting is a system the democracy works with. So far two persons expessed here their need of an item which could help to mark resolved problems.
I personnally think a folder you suggested could be a great option!

TINTMYLF - I like the FAQ option I would prefer the info/FAQ to be added to the Librarians manual - I have a "issues" with information being kept in different places ( call it a QA/RA back ground:)

Charmteaser wrote: "Paula, yes, the poster should mark for example editing the title. The problem is that in most cases this doesn't happen. :("
That's because most of us are not convinced that it is necessary.
And a poll does little to address that; people's comments are far more helpful.
That's because most of us are not convinced that it is necessary.
And a poll does little to address that; people's comments are far more helpful.


With one thread per "issue" you can scan to see that things have been fixed quickly, and you also can catch any relevant discussion beyond the basic "please fix this" and "done".

I like the system as it is because it's easier to navigate through fewer threads, and because it encourages those posting here for a 'fix' by providing a clearly labeled thread to put the type of fix request into.
Charmteaser said: "Learning is never waste of time, don't get me wrong. I just think it could be helpful in situations when we want just to fix something."
Charmteaser, there are plenty of things out there still needing to be fixed - head to the Sisyphus list, or just use the comment box to look up instances of Dr.-etc.-Mr.-Mrs.-RN-CPA-Rev and so on (open each in another tab/window to work on.) If you want other ideas on how to find stuff to fix, PM me and I'll give you another list. = )

And yes, I'll appreciate a PM from you. :)
