Open
discussion
Comments
date
newest »


I totally agree with you @Ed. It is unlike many other autobiographies,where people try to paint a halo around themselves. Agassi was honest and humble. He neither tried to portray himself as a superhuman nor wallowed in self-pity. I enjoyed every bit of it and finished it in a single sitting.

Connors, on the other hand, saved his contempt for his opponents and the "country club" atmosphere that surrounded tennis when he came to it. He was indeed the consummate outsider, and brought the street brawler instinct to every match in his long career.
So... Andre comes across as a victim, while Connors comes across as a brash malcontent who took great pleasure in taking on every sacred cow he could find.
I really liked this book.