Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
Policies & Practices
>
Dealing with posters and other non-books
message 51:
by
Melody
(new)
Aug 26, 2008 05:15AM

reply
|
flag

I vote to keep in the Witches' Calendars because they are so chalk full of information. They have birth dates and historical events outlined throughout them. They are not your standard calendar with just a pretty picture attached. They are very helpful with holiday seasons as well. Recipes and folklore are often found in the side columns of them.

Some contain a black/white outline picture on one page, and a full page description of the picture on the other page, chalk full of information.
And some 'sticker' books are just children's picture books with some pages of stickers stuck in as a carrot....
But I have many more which I do not.
I think it relies on individual judgment.


http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/29...#


http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/22...
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/22...
Amy Jenkins has written a novel called 'Honeymoon' but I've never heard of Honeymoon Bunting and Honeymoon Proof. They have isbn, but no information whatsoever at all in the literary websites.

I don't know what bunting is.
I would suspect the above two are NOT A BOOKs. They do both have ISBNs so I'd put NOT A BOOK in front of them.
Neither have ratings.
The proofs are plural. If a single proof I might leave it, but multiple it seems to be NOT A BOOK to me.
I'll wait for some consensus. I've been wrong other times in both directions about NOT A BOOKs.
No one seems to know about these items except Amazon (and other sites like GR that get their data from Amazon's API) -- never a good sign. I expect these are probably NABs.

If I remember correctly, according to Otis, the answer is NO.
Given that only 2 people have rated it, I'd message them before deleting, so they know and can add the books separately if they want.
That's my opinion anyway.


Rivka? Others? Do you remember?
Cait, I don't think it's the cough syrup. ;-)

If I remember correctly, according to Otis, the answer is NO.
Correct. With the exception of cases where such collections have actually been sold as such and have an ISBN.
Correct. With the exception of cases where such collections have actually been sold as such and have an ISBN.


If I had a part of a series edition I would be annoyed to have to add them all separately. That can be tedious.


"I actually have no problem with the above examples as it's clear which books members mean, but my understanding is they're not supposed to be added to Goodreads."
And what is Goodreads reason for this stand? Just to be super nitpicky? Boxed sets should be able to be in the database. I really don't see their point.


http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/15...

(Did you notice that I finally figured out how to make my links nice and neat? Took long enough, didn't it?)

JG, or Anyone, So could you post (or send me) instructions. Thanks!!!
Then, this time I'll try to use them when I post.


Except that you don't actually put the underscore (_) after the first less than sign as I did (I put them in there so the "raw" code would appear properly and not be auto-translated as a link). Again, the steps are:
1. Use <_a href="link here"> (the double quotations must be there as part of the code, and you should delete the underscore after the less than symbol)
2. Followed by the text you want highlighted as the actual link
3. Followed by
Hope this makes sense.

Thanks.
So, do members really mind the straight links?! ;-)
Well, I'll copy & paste and practice to myself first.
I have no idea what a Clip Strip is, unless it's a sequence of film cells.
And a TP assortment to me sounds like scented and unscented. ;) Or maybe different colors/patterns.
And a TP assortment to me sounds like scented and unscented. ;) Or maybe different colors/patterns.



Posters: definitely not a book. Sticker and painting books are usually not, but it depends -- sometimes you can tell that they have substantial amounts of text as well as the other.