Goodreads Librarians Group discussion

Aesop’s Fables
This topic is about Aesop’s Fables
20 views
Questions (not edit requests) > First printed edition vs. arbitrary ancient date

Comments Showing 1-1 of 1 (1 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

João Melhorance (joaomelhorance) | 10 comments I noticed that the “original publishing date” for Aesop’s Fables is listed as -560. This is not only arbitrary, but also just an approximation, since Aesop never published a book and the fables circulated orally and in manuscripts for centuries.

For the sake of consistency, especially compared to modern works, we normally consider the date of the first printed edition as the publishing date, not the existence of earlier manuscripts. In this case, the first known printed version was Heinrich Steinhöwel’s edition in 1476, Augsburg.

Wouldn’t it make more sense to reflect this fact and adjust the “original publishing date” accordingly?


back to top