The Debate Club discussion
: ̗̀➛ Ethics and Education
>
•✩• Is it Ethical to Do Scientific Testing on Minors?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Barnette ⋆˙⟡ , Creator, Head Moderator
(new)
Sep 12, 2025 02:25PM

reply
|
flag

Most of the studies i've looked at, you have to above 16 to be a part of, which seems fair to me.
agreed!
also minors shouldn't be engaging in anything potentially life-altering, like they're still young we don't always make the best decisions and honestly your life won't end if you can't participate in a study
also minors shouldn't be engaging in anything potentially life-altering, like they're still young we don't always make the best decisions and honestly your life won't end if you can't participate in a study

I'm assuming yall are talking about studies 👍
😭😭 I'm pretty sure we're talking about consensual testing 😭 otherwise, that's just messed up on a whole different level

I'm assuming yall are talking about studies 👍"
ME TOOO, I literally was about to come give my spiel about how this isn't an argument it's torture, but, now that i realize. STILL NOOOOO, their brains aren't developed yet

i guess, but also how can a guardian give consent for their kid? i get it but also i don't, the minor should be able to directly make their own decisions and if they aren't old enough too, then they should just be not allowed until theyre 18
What if the test is specifically about children and how a certain medication reacts with children or how their brain functions in a certain situation or something like that? (not really directed at anyone, just a prompt)

bc i feel like there are some types of testing that can be good for someone and help them, making it ethical, but then it can be negative and immediately make it unethical

I don’t think it’s ethical to do testing on a child in most scenarios. If a child can’t consent to sex they can’t consent to scientific testing.
However, if a child’s life is on the line and this might help, then it is up to the parents and child to discuss and decide
However, if a child’s life is on the line and this might help, then it is up to the parents and child to discuss and decide

I meant scientific research, i didnt realise barnette put the title as testing lol. But yeah, any kind if research which can range from brain scans and blood tests to drug trials
I think non invasive scientific testing is a completely different discussion
But even the radiation from an x ray cld be unsafe. It’s radiation after all.
(Not that I’m a big believer in coddling lol)
But even the radiation from an x ray cld be unsafe. It’s radiation after all.
(Not that I’m a big believer in coddling lol)
Hazel wrote: "bibliophile [semi ia] wrote: "Is that what we mean by scientific testing? I thought we’re discussing drug trials"
I meant scientific research, i didnt realise barnette put the title as testing lol..."
I can change the title if needed
I meant scientific research, i didnt realise barnette put the title as testing lol..."
I can change the title if needed

Its okayy dw
I meant scientific research, i didnt realise barnette put the title ..."

But even the radiation from an x ray cld be unsafe. It’s radiation after all.
(Not that I’m a big believer in coddling..."
Yeah agreed


Ofc you should be allowed to do brain scans on minors that’s necessary for a lot of health stuff and brain injuries 😭 ik it’s for research purposes which is different, but I’d say if they’re over 13 and them and their parents agree then why not? With invasive testing and drug trials it’s very different though