Libba Bray Lovers! discussion
The Gemma Doyle Trilogy
>
Fee and Pip!?!?! (TSFT SPOILER ALERT!!)
message 1:
by
Emma
(new)
Mar 31, 2008 05:41PM

reply
|
flag
I should have, they were always so close, I think they started dating in Rebel, because obviously it wouldn't be accepted in Victorian Society, and they could be found out.
Do you guys think they started showing their attraction for each other in Rebel Angel's or TSFT?
I think its actually the other way around, Pip having more attraction in the beginning anyway and Fee being more attracted when she was lost in the realms.
True, but I think she didn't know that she was in love with Fee at the beginning. Like, she hung on every word Fee said and she was Fee's best friend, but then when she was in the realms she realized her attraction to Fee.
Ya know, that makes sense, I was really surprised at the end how Pip manipulated Fee instead of the other way around. I think also, they knew the end was near so whats the point of hiding it anymore? And they should have a last moment of love, so it makes sense. And Fee was desperate to see Pip ever since Pip left to the realms. Especially with the factory girls there.
I saw it for Felicity in the very first book, and there were some hints about Pip. I was still surprised, but I'm like, oh yea, i sorta saw that coming.
Pip seemed so set on guys though, but it might've been because of society, so when she was talking about boys she was talking about girls. But then again she was always jealous of Gemma...
That's true,it was normal. I think they didn't realize their feeling for each other until Pippa went to the realms. I think Pippa is bisexual too.
Bisexual? Not sure what that is, sorry!
And I never saw it coming. I had to reread that part of it cause I was like, wait what just happened?
Bisexual is when someone likes both females and makes. I was soo mad at myself that I didn't see it.

I know! I've said it before and I will say it again, I was banging my head against the wall for not noticing it! I absolutely love Libba for being true to her books despite it being controversal.


Not to mention she is soo down to earth. I would love to meet her! She's not someone whose fame has gone to her head, she is so wonderful and funny!

Yep! I'm going to be one of the first people in line! She has the british tone down, but then again, I'm not english, so I wouldn't know.

I love sarcasm! In my plays my favorite characters are always VERY sarcastic!
I love witty humor and sarcasm!!!!!!!!!!! Thats why I LOVE Shakespeare!
Hmm, I re-read AGATB and I agree with Taylor that Fee loved Pip first now. Fee was always scolding Pip for having her head in the clouds.

idk where im going w/ this
i was really suprised with fee and pip....i had no idea and when i did know it took me like a week to really except it!

I was, like i said, slightly surprised, but I saw hints in the very first book, and it was kinda at the back of my mind, so when it came out, I was just like, 'oh. okay. I was right.' lol
i guess it makes since....but cuz like in the caves when fee was like im gunna have hundreds of men....idkk
message 38:
by
Allie, A hopeless romantic who doesn't believe in love
(last edited Feb 14, 2009 08:26AM)
(new)
yeah.... but pippa was all shocked at her and felicity was being teasing or something, i thinks. so, idk, mayb she's bi.
I also agree (i'm re-reading these posts) with wut taylor said, about fee loving pippa first, but i think it became stronger when pippa was lost, and that's when she started to really love fee back. before that, i think she just wanted the attention.
hmm.... i think libba answered this in one of her blogs.... *goes to find*
I also agree (i'm re-reading these posts) with wut taylor said, about fee loving pippa first, but i think it became stronger when pippa was lost, and that's when she started to really love fee back. before that, i think she just wanted the attention.
hmm.... i think libba answered this in one of her blogs.... *goes to find*
message 39:
by
Allie, A hopeless romantic who doesn't believe in love
(last edited Feb 14, 2009 08:42AM)
(new)
*sigh* haven't found the fee/pip part yet. But this refers to what you said lisa, about needing/not needing a man-
I’ve read through your many posts now, and I am surprised to see so many that ask, “How can Gemma live without Kartik?” or “He was the best part of the book!”
Really? I mean, really really?
I admit to being somewhat distressed by these sentiments. There are many strong female characters in this book—women who, to me, are every bit as important as a certain young man from the Rakshana whom I also happen to love. But the story is, ultimately, Gemma’s, after all. I hope that within these roughly 2,000 pages is a tale about women searching for their place in the world, coming to terms with themselves, fighting for change, accepting their power, dealing with issues of friendship, family, responsibility, sexuality, and identity, struggling with fears and doubts, hope and longing, oppression and desire. I hope.
And yet, it seems as if the prevailing sentiment is, The only thing that matters is the man/is having a man. Am I mistaken? Am I reading this incorrectly? I’m asking.
Love and romance are certainly important. I get that. I like romance, too, though it’s more of a Billy Wilder kind of romance than a Harlequin kind of romance. I would wager that we all want to share our lives with a partner. I have been happily married for many years in a relationship that I treasure and that has forced me to grow up many, many times over. I won’t bore you with my thoughts about the first blush of romantic love versus the sort of work that is necessary for a mature, lasting love and partnership (suffice to say that when the baby is vomiting at 2:00 a.m. and the heat’s gone out again, it is not about hearts and roses and eyes like pools of mud…)
I’ve read through your many posts now, and I am surprised to see so many that ask, “How can Gemma live without Kartik?” or “He was the best part of the book!”
Really? I mean, really really?
I admit to being somewhat distressed by these sentiments. There are many strong female characters in this book—women who, to me, are every bit as important as a certain young man from the Rakshana whom I also happen to love. But the story is, ultimately, Gemma’s, after all. I hope that within these roughly 2,000 pages is a tale about women searching for their place in the world, coming to terms with themselves, fighting for change, accepting their power, dealing with issues of friendship, family, responsibility, sexuality, and identity, struggling with fears and doubts, hope and longing, oppression and desire. I hope.
And yet, it seems as if the prevailing sentiment is, The only thing that matters is the man/is having a man. Am I mistaken? Am I reading this incorrectly? I’m asking.
Love and romance are certainly important. I get that. I like romance, too, though it’s more of a Billy Wilder kind of romance than a Harlequin kind of romance. I would wager that we all want to share our lives with a partner. I have been happily married for many years in a relationship that I treasure and that has forced me to grow up many, many times over. I won’t bore you with my thoughts about the first blush of romantic love versus the sort of work that is necessary for a mature, lasting love and partnership (suffice to say that when the baby is vomiting at 2:00 a.m. and the heat’s gone out again, it is not about hearts and roses and eyes like pools of mud…)
ah-ha! *victory dance* I found it, I found it!
“Was Felicity always gay/Were Fee and Pip always lovers?”
I always felt that Fee was gay and that she was in denial, thus the fling with Ithal and others. I don’t think it’s until she has the freedom of the realms that she begins to understand herself and her feelings for Pip.
I always felt that Pip’s sexuality might be more in flux. She doesn’t really know who she is or what she wants and wants people to tell her, which is part of what makes her so dangerous. She does love Fee but she enjoys toying with people—she enjoys having people want her. (She manipulates Bessie’s affections quite a bit.) But Felicity’s love for her is true and, as said, probably keeps Pip human a while longer past her “sell by” date.
Though there are hints along the way, I don’t think it’s until TSFT that they act on their feelings.
“Was Felicity always gay/Were Fee and Pip always lovers?”
I always felt that Fee was gay and that she was in denial, thus the fling with Ithal and others. I don’t think it’s until she has the freedom of the realms that she begins to understand herself and her feelings for Pip.
I always felt that Pip’s sexuality might be more in flux. She doesn’t really know who she is or what she wants and wants people to tell her, which is part of what makes her so dangerous. She does love Fee but she enjoys toying with people—she enjoys having people want her. (She manipulates Bessie’s affections quite a bit.) But Felicity’s love for her is true and, as said, probably keeps Pip human a while longer past her “sell by” date.
Though there are hints along the way, I don’t think it’s until TSFT that they act on their feelings.
Lisa, I don't think it was Fee needing a romantic relationship as much as knowing that there are other lesbians and bisexuals out there.

Oh, I hadn't thought of that. Different slant entirely!
ya i thought that might happen because Pip really didn't want 2 marry that guy and felicity was soooo mad when she found out though i wasn't really sure
the only thing that kinda caught me was that Fee seamed to kinda like that Indian guy
Ithal? Well, she could've just been hiding it, or as we've previously talked about Fee could be bisexual.