North & South discussion

This topic is about
Wives and Daughters
Wives & Daughters
>
Introduction and Preliminary Comments
Thanks, Jennifer. There's so much to the story and so many characters to analyze! I look forward to everyone's comments when we get started.

I am going to be a little late starting this I think, but I will be joining in as soon as I can. Thanks for the first post, I'll make sure I revisit it before I begin the book.

Ceri - I'm glad you'll be joining us, even if it's a little late.
Fanny - I'm going to post threads for about 8-9 chapters at a time. This gets us through the book by the end of May (a 7-week read). It ends up being a little more than a chapter a day if you want to stay on a steady schedule.
Fanny - I'm going to post threads for about 8-9 chapters at a time. This gets us through the book by the end of May (a 7-week read). It ends up being a little more than a chapter a day if you want to stay on a steady schedule.
Thanks for the brilliant introductory post, Trudy. :) I'm afraid I may be a little late starting as well, seeing as I'm still waiting for the book to arrive! But I'm really looking forward to reading it with everyone, especially after reading your introduction to it.
Waiting for a book is exciting, though. I find I want to keep reading this book beyond the time I've alotted myself, so hopefully it won't be hard for any late-starters to catch up. :)
Thanks, btw. Glad you like my intro.
Thanks, btw. Glad you like my intro.
message 9:
by
Rebecca, ~Look back. Look back at me...~
(last edited Apr 12, 2015 03:35PM)
(new)
-
added it
That's true! :) We all read at different paces I suppose, but everyone (like me!!) should be able to catch up at one time or another. That's the nice thing about a group read, I find - everyone can read at their own speed and discussions will still be there whenever they get to them.

Who is the narrator, Fanny? There was a review at Amazon for W&D that said the audible version was fantastic.

Wives and Daughters by Elizabeth Cleghorn Gaskell http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0084ADOVK/r... via @amazon
http://www.audible.com/pd/Fiction/Wiv...

FYI today's deal is Candide narrated by the delicious Jack Davenport (public service mention:)


Fanny wrote: "Is anyone else reading / listening with faces in mind of the memorable adaptation?"
Totally am! They were all wonderfully portrayed in the BBC adaptation.
Totally am! They were all wonderfully portrayed in the BBC adaptation.

Andrea (Catsos Person) wrote: "Would you all mind if I joined the group read?
I missed the group read of North and South."
Welcome, Andrea! We'd love to have you join us. It's never too late to add your comments for any group read, including the former N&S group read. I'm always interested in what others have to say and the subject never gets old. :)
I missed the group read of North and South."
Welcome, Andrea! We'd love to have you join us. It's never too late to add your comments for any group read, including the former N&S group read. I'm always interested in what others have to say and the subject never gets old. :)

Funny note: I downloaded the free Kindle book from Amazon. The first line starts out "illustrationo begin with the old rigmarole of childhood." In some confusion, I went to the Gutenberg online version to compare it. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/4274/4...-.
It shows a pen and ink drawing of a father and daughter riding a horse and pony, and in the picture is a drawn letter T, which is the initial letter of the first line.
The image won't embed, but here's a copy of it: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/4274/4...
I checked down further in the novel and this is done a few more times. So if anyone else was confused too, I hope I've helped!

I'm glad to participate here.
Also, when I finally get to read N&S, I will follow the earlier discussion here and add my own comments.

Thanks Andrea and Tadiana. :)
This is my second read, so I'm inevitably gleaning much more this time because I know what clues to look for.
I believe one of the traits or moral virtues that Gaskell is examining is the capacity to be unselfish - the practice of putting others' needs/happiness before your own. Or at least the ability to be aware of what others may be feeling - an ability to genuinely sympathize with others.
I think we'll see characters in this book on all different levels regarding the expression of or omission of this trait. Some will have blind spots in otherwise good characters. Others leave much to be desired in this department!
This is my second read, so I'm inevitably gleaning much more this time because I know what clues to look for.
I believe one of the traits or moral virtues that Gaskell is examining is the capacity to be unselfish - the practice of putting others' needs/happiness before your own. Or at least the ability to be aware of what others may be feeling - an ability to genuinely sympathize with others.
I think we'll see characters in this book on all different levels regarding the expression of or omission of this trait. Some will have blind spots in otherwise good characters. Others leave much to be desired in this department!

Those of us who are reading for the first can benefit from your experience! :)

lol I did exactly the same thing with North and South :)
I'll try to avoid spoilers in the threads, but I'll just say if you are wavering on reading this folks--go for it--it's wonderful!
Congrats, Hana! You're a speedy reader. Now you can take a closer look at developing situations. And the nature of each character becomes clearer to determine the second time around.
I'll add new chapter threads slowly. I like to keep a steady pace for the group as a whole.
Oh, now you can watch the mini-series, right? I think you'll love it!
I'll add new chapter threads slowly. I like to keep a steady pace for the group as a whole.
Oh, now you can watch the mini-series, right? I think you'll love it!

Now I want to go back slowly as you say to see how Gaskell worked her magic on me and to savor all the fine points. As character-driven novels go, this is just magnificent. I'm looking forward to pacing myself with the group now that I've finished my guilty binge-read ;)
I'm of two minds about the mini-series. I really want to see it, especially the way they handled the end, but I also want to see Gaskell's art clearly and sometimes the strong visual images of a really good adaptation can take away from the reading process.
I can see your point. It's hard to decide when to watch when you're trying to dive into the book.
The book always wins in fine detail. I've enjoyed imagining the characters from the adaptation in this read. They really do a great job of capturing the essence of these complex characters.
The book always wins in fine detail. I've enjoyed imagining the characters from the adaptation in this read. They really do a great job of capturing the essence of these complex characters.

I'm not far short of finishing it either, I was thinking I'd have to start again to keep pace with the chat too!

I broke down and ordered the DVD. So much for literary purism ;)

I'm glad Hana will be going back over the book and adding her additional perceptions. Louise, I hope you can re-read or at least continue to add your comments as the discussion continues this month and next. There's a lot to note in this long and involved book.
I'm impatient for Ceri and Becca to begin adding their comments! lol.
I'm impatient for Ceri and Becca to begin adding their comments! lol.
message 42:
by
Rebecca, ~Look back. Look back at me...~
(last edited Apr 21, 2015 05:23PM)
(new)
-
added it
Don't worry Ceri, I'm only just starting it now! I got the book about a week ago but I had three other books on the go at the time, and I've been busy. :( I'll have to work hard to catch up!
Sorry I'm so late to the party, Trudy!! :D
@ Andrea: Very happy to have you with us for this one. :) As Louise said, the more the merrier!
Sorry I'm so late to the party, Trudy!! :D
@ Andrea: Very happy to have you with us for this one. :) As Louise said, the more the merrier!

Sorry..."
Thanks Becca.
I'll look forward to Ceri and Becca's reflections when ready!

:O Michael Gambon and Rosamund Pike are in the series?! *goes to find series immediately* I love them! Looking forward to this even more now!

They are indeed. Michael Gambon plays Squire Hamley, with Penelope Wilton as Mrs Hamley, and Rosamund Pike is Lady Harriet Cumnor.


Samanta wrote: "I'm just about to start it too. I just don't have the time, what with work and exams and so many beautiful books at my disposal :sighs:"
My life in a nutshell! Well, minus the exams, at least for the moment. I hope your exams are going well? :)
My life in a nutshell! Well, minus the exams, at least for the moment. I hope your exams are going well? :)
The threads for discussion will be posted soon. We'll aim to read 8-9 chapters a week.
I've written below a no-spoilers introduction to the story that may help illuminate what to look for as you read. At the very least, I hope it will entice you to think about what Gaskell meant to convey in this work. I've condensed some of the concepts elaborated upon in the official introduction to the book included in the Barnes & Noble edition, written by Dr. Amy M. King.
Introduction:
Wives & Daughters first appeared as a serial (1864-1866) in the Cornhill Magazine alongside stories from fellow literary luminaries Anthony Trollope and Wilkie Collins. Gaskell died suddenly in 1865, leaving the story unfinished. Fortunately for the reader who engrosses himself in this long tale, the story was near completion and the ultimate resolution of events is clearly designated. The story only lacks that final satisfaction of reading how Gaskell would have brought the book to its evident conclusion. (The BBC adaptation invents a very sweet ending.)
As in North and South, Gaskell's novel centers on the experiences of a girl - Molly Gibson - on the threshold of womanhood. Far from the gray and bustling industrial town of Milton, however, the events of this tale take place in the quaint, lush countryside town of Hollingsford (modeled, as in Cranford, after Gaskell's childhood home of Knutsford).
It's important to note that Gaskell chose to step back in time some forty years to capture the way of life in England before the rushing progress of industrialization began to affect the country with dizzying speed. Set in the 1820s, this is the era freshly recovering from the Napoleonic wars -- before the railroad and before the Reform Laws began to give voting rights to more of the middle class.
Wives and Daughters: an Every-Day Story is Gaskell at her brilliant best, detailing the nuances of family life and the complexities of the interchanges in community life. And here, as in North and South, the author examines the role of class distinctions in society and its effect on individual freedom. (The foremost families in the story include those of a titled earl and an untitled "squire" whose ancestors have owned land in the neighboring village for centuries.)
Unlike the more authoritative narrative style of Austen, Gaskell's narrative style is subtle and the reader is required to make her own observations of character as daily events unfold. The texture of relationships into which Molly finds herself woven creates a rich tapestry of human personalities and situations in which we can continually discover the unalloyed substance of Molly's nature.
Since Molly is the central character of the novel, it is particularly fitting that her social position allows her to fluidly move into the circles of the various levels of society. Her father's avocation as the town doctor is a position of somewhat ambiguous esteem in that era, which allowed the individual to claim much of his esteem by his own conduct and practical success.
Natural science plays a part in the novel and the author cleverly draws a parallel between the observation of plants and insects and the overarching observation of humans -- both as individuals and in their role within the larger community of fellow creatures. It is in this context of scientific observation, reason, and knowledge that Gaskell seems to silently question the supremacy of men, for in this story we find men of science (most notably Dr Gibson and Roger Hamley) making blunders in personal judgments, which a more careful observation might have avoided.
By the time we finish what is written, we are given the opportunity to make our final analysis in regard to our examination of Molly Gibson as a specimen of humanity and can determine for ourselves whether she is "every-day" common or truly extraordinary.
The considerations that Gaskell subtly raises may consist of some the following. You will undoubtedly think of others:
Are differences of class natural or constructed?
What constitutes good judgment or true intelligence?
Is the human race one species?
What is the place of women in general society -- or in a world of reason and science?
What skills or traits deserve our highest esteem?
Has society progressed since this captured era?