Reading the Chunksters discussion
This topic is about
To Serve Them All My Days
To Serve Them All My Days
>
To Serve Them All My Days - Week 8
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Hugh
(new)
Nov 21, 2023 07:18AM
This week's section covers the whole of part VII
reply
|
flag
TO SERVE THEM ALL MY DAYS – 8th Week - PART VII, Chapters 1-3I will put the summary in spoilers. (view spoiler)
Christine acted as a true politician and forced her husband to give her divorce. I appreciate that she is not proud of her deed.I had doubts regarding her being a successful (longterm) politician, she is self determined and will not adjust in murky waters of politics.
Yeah, I agree that being a long-term politician would not be a good fit for Chris. I agree with your analysis too. I didn't think her previous attitude indicated the flexibility she'd need for the role. Of course, her political demise works well for our storyline. Even with her freedom to marry with a pending divorce, her political life and David's career would not be able to mesh to enable them to marry. So to avoid having the storyline spin in place and let us finally get to another phase in David's personal life, something had to give.
Now to see if adding Chris into the Bamfylde equation adds some spice to Bamfylde events. Things progressing nicely for David at Bamfylde can be satisfying but makes for a snooze-inducing story after awhile. You can't keep the plot going with vignettes of carious student's incidents. With Carter, Alcock and Blunt now gone, David's going to need some other person to battle with and supply some conflict and the dramatic tension this story thrives on.
Being a principal brought many challenges in its wake, the plot regarding Chris and David is masterfully handled and i must say it was not an easy task for Chris to adjust.I must wait for the next thread to talk about that.
It is useless for me to say that i liked the book as I was continuously singing its praises through out the read.Thanks Brian, for nominating it and for leading.
The only thing which I missed in this book, to make it my favourite top three door stoppers is that David's character is somewhat less realistic, he never makes a wrong decision. But this conclusion only comes when I compare it to portrayal of Philip Carey in Maugham's Of Human Bondage and Scarlett O' Hara of Mitchell's Gone with the wind.
Both these characters have negative shades in their characters and acted selfishly at some point in the narration. Philip Carey makes wrong decision and takes the consequences in his stride, I think that makes him more realistic character.
I liked the nicknames, they are used by students all over the world, but a principal who remembers and uses all the nicknames is very interesting.
I read Of Human Bondage 18 years ago and was surprised how much I liked it. Five stars. I did enjoy and empathize with Philip Carey even though much of his personal pain is self-inflicted. He was definitely flawed, but likeable.But I thought David was flawed too. (view spoiler) While I did empathize with David, I found him to be only moderately likeable.
I agree, one of the David's major merit was to listen to others, even Carter, he was open minded and did not nurture prejudices, such people rarely make mistakes.
Brian E wrote: "I read Of Human Bondage 18 years ago and was surprised how much I liked it. Five stars. I did enjoy and empathize with Philip Carey even though much of his personal pain is self-inflic...""[...] as I think she might have led him astray if he had let her." I'm puzzling over this - Please would you help me to understand this angle? Thank you for everything and for these generous summaries!
Books mentioned in this topic
Of Human Bondage (other topics)Of Human Bondage (other topics)

