Georgette Heyer Fans discussion

This topic is about
Snowdrift and Other Stories
Group Reads
>
Group read November 23 Snowdrift / Pistols for Two: the middle four stories
date
newest »

There seems to be a hitch starting a thread for the last four stories - perhaps I've created too many in quick succession. I'll start one as soon as I'm allowed!

Sorry Jenny - forgot to tell you. Due to problems with spammers I think even moderators can only create three new threads a day. Complaints to GR about how hard that things make for moderators have fallen on deaf ears!
I'll create the final thread for you. :)

(view spoiler)

I think Night at the Inn is really an amazing mix of creepy and a very sweet love story. Seems unlike anything else by Heyer I've read, or am I forgetting something?
John (especially) and to a lesser extent Mary feel like real people, although John's naivete put him at risk of his life. It still makes sense given what we know about his family by the way he speaks of them.
I don't know if this is my favorite in the book, but it's certainly the most memorable.

I also like the fact that Fanny's daughter is such a caring daughter.
Night at the Inn is such a creepy rendition of the Sweeney Todd story. It's done really well but the romance is disappointingly abrupt!
Night At The Inn is fun, isn't it? Very different from her usual stories! The romance, I feel, is really only there because a GH reader expects one - and also to serve as a red herring for the real story. The hero has got to do something in the evening before the main story, so embarking on a fledgling relationship is as good as anything to keep him occupied for a few hours; and of course, Miss Gateshead's utter obliviousness to the whole affair is funny, too.
The other notable feature of the story is the social class of the protagonists - much more middle-class than her usual cast, aren't they? But I suppose her usual aristocratic subjects wouldn't be staying at such a dodgy joint, and they would have had servants with them - certainly the young lady wouldn't have been alone.
The other notable feature of the story is the social class of the protagonists - much more middle-class than her usual cast, aren't they? But I suppose her usual aristocratic subjects wouldn't be staying at such a dodgy joint, and they would have had servants with them - certainly the young lady wouldn't have been alone.




True…;o)

of course, Miss Gateshead's utter obliviousness to the whole affair is funny, too.
it really is, and his care to keep her completely innocent of it now and forever is sweet, I don't care if it's sexist. He is a very nice man and makes an excellent hero.
that's a good point about everyone's class, it seems necessary so that Mary is completely alone.
I've never read Sweeney Todd.


It's a great story and I agree that it's not like anything else GH wrote. Nearest I suppose would be Footsteps In The Dark, but I much prefer Night At The Inn.
Do you think we're meant to believe that the murderous innkeepers were actually dishing up their late guests on the menu? Or were they just boiling up the remains to make them less identifiable and easier to dispose of?
My scepticism about love at first sight spoils my enjoyment of Pink Domino. I have to accept in my head that it sometimes really happens, because people who have been happily married for years tell me it does, but I don't really believe in it. So a story like this one that depends wholly on (a) love at first sight and (b) an amazing coincidence ring rather hollow to me. It's a fun yarn, though, and I won't say I actively dislike it.
Characters from April Lady are instantly recognisable, even down to their names! Letty's Jeremy may have become Edwin, but he's definitely the same person.
If ever I found myself transported by time machine to GH's Regency, I would definitely know not to go to a masquerade, though - so many of her heroines have unfortunate experiences that it's clear they are Not At All The Thing.
Characters from April Lady are instantly recognisable, even down to their names! Letty's Jeremy may have become Edwin, but he's definitely the same person.
If ever I found myself transported by time machine to GH's Regency, I would definitely know not to go to a masquerade, though - so many of her heroines have unfortunate experiences that it's clear they are Not At All The Thing.


oh, boy, not sure I want to think about this much but she did mention the watery soup John and Mary (and Waggleswick) are eating.
I hope it's just the disposal.

Also fun is to speculate how Lady Pednor reacts to hearing the news, and how it might vary depending on the way she hears it.
- personally over morning chocolate
- a note or letter
- an invitation to the celebration
- from a third party
- or just reading it in the papers

Also easier, in those days, to pass them off as bones from the long past.

If she had set this story in the Scottish Borders then I think would have been a definite hint that the meat in the meat pies was not necessarily from a Cow or a sheep! But in this short story, I’m definitely believing that it’s simply a way of removing the flesh! (And that is pretty horrific anyway!)
Big Fan wrote: "The twist in "Husband" isn't strongly telegraphed, but it's fun to look for any hints. One might be the daughter's comments about the man in question. A weaker one could be the visit from the siste..."
I did notice that in the 'crunch' conversation between Lord Harleston & Mrs Wingham that no names are mentioned, nor even any useful identifying pronouns! The conversation is a bit stilted because of its delicate and emotional nature, which makes that seem less unnatural: so Lord H is too delicate to actually state the reason for his visit, but only says "I believe you must know for what purpose" and then says "I collect - a prior attachment?" rather than "You mean you're in love with somebody else?"
What a mess being too formal and too delicate can make of a proposal!
I did notice that in the 'crunch' conversation between Lord Harleston & Mrs Wingham that no names are mentioned, nor even any useful identifying pronouns! The conversation is a bit stilted because of its delicate and emotional nature, which makes that seem less unnatural: so Lord H is too delicate to actually state the reason for his visit, but only says "I believe you must know for what purpose" and then says "I collect - a prior attachment?" rather than "You mean you're in love with somebody else?"
What a mess being too formal and too delicate can make of a proposal!

And the underdone stringy mutton!!! That's what immediately came into my mind when it was said they were chopping people up!

I love that Clarissa was older for a GH heroine (from memory, there is also an older heroine in one of the Acting on Impulse: Contemporary Short Stories stories. Lord Harleston is a favourite hero - he is so sweet, kind & romantic.
To Have the Honour actually has a very strong (but slightly rushed) storyline. I think it would have made a good novella - given Trix a bit more room! 😅It does remind me of (view spoiler)
Both 5★

It's tricky to fool the characters and the reader/audience, leading to some awkwardness. In mystery/suspense stories, the camera might show just the feet, a gloved hand with the gun, a backlit hooded character, or just the back of the villain. On the other hand, it would be really tricky to hide the identity of the old gentleman during his dinner conversation with Mary Challoner.
The confusion caused by mismatched conversations is used by GH in multiple stories. Of course, Kit impersonating his twin would give rise to a bunch of misunderstandings. Sophy intentionally misinterpreted comments from Charles. At the first meeting of Abby and Miles, one of them knew something was wrong. Freddy and Kitty were briefly confused at the inn.
Ancilla got confused with both Julian and Waldo for the "big mis". "Honour" in this group of stories also has one,
again at the inn.
Elinor and Carlyon has a long one with neither one knowing there is something wrong, and it sets up the situation nicely.
Off topic, one fun example of this device is when the Gregory Peck character and the Audrey Hepburn character discuss the circumstances under which her character's father might retire.

Sorry- but when did Sophy impersonate a twin with Charles? What have I missed?

You missed nothing ... each sentence in Big Fan's post refers to a different GH novel, and the 'it' refers to the 'confusion created by mismatched conversation'

So perhaps it was not not unreasonable for me to have assumed the ‘it ‘ was referencing the impersonation - rather than the miscommunication.
An easy error for me to make, but of course I appreciate your correction.

So perhaps it was not not unreasonable for me to have assumed the ‘it ‘ was referencing the impersonation - rather than the ..."
the 'it'-reference IS misleading ... i.e., your mental grammar has it correctly, nothing wrong there! ;-)

To have the honour - fun and funny, Timothy is a hoot!
My two favorites, I think

It's a great story and I agree..."
Night at the Inn is indeed very different from anything else & proves that GH could have written Victorian style melodrama if she so chose. I liked that these were a working hero/heroine, but found the romance too instalove - I'd like it to have been dialed back just a little. 4.5★
Carol She's So Novel꧁꧂ wrote: "... but found the romance too instalove - I'd like it to have been dialed back just a little. ..."
To me, that worked all right because the couple were left at the point of wanting to see more of each other, rather than an instant engagement, and that's quite realistic.
Though I did wonder how Miss Gateshead's employer would view her having a suitor! Was a governess allowed gentlemen callers? Would she even have been allowed to 'walk out' with him on her day off, or would that have been too scandalous?
To me, that worked all right because the couple were left at the point of wanting to see more of each other, rather than an instant engagement, and that's quite realistic.
Though I did wonder how Miss Gateshead's employer would view her having a suitor! Was a governess allowed gentlemen callers? Would she even have been allowed to 'walk out' with him on her day off, or would that have been too scandalous?

So perhaps it was not not unreasonable for me to have assumed the ‘it ‘ was referencing the impe..." [#30 above]
The text [in #26] has been edited to make it clearer.

Everything Jenny said! Plus Letty is a brat and has no business getting married to anyone except maybe an old man who will pamper her.

Pink Domino
A Husband for Fanny
To Have the Honour
Night at the Inn
without spoiler tags for those stories - but please don't forget to use spoiler tags for the other stories or other books.