Boxall's 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die discussion

This topic is about
The Count of Monte Cristo
1001 Monthly Group Read
>
March {2015} Discussion -- THE COUNT OF MONTE CRISTO by Alexandre Dumas
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Charity
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Mar 17, 2015 06:47AM

reply
|
flag

This is my second Dumas book in a year (after Musketeers) and I am so disappointed that I never read him earlier. The thing that makes him stand out so from his peers is that the narrative never drags or feels like work. Unlike Dickens or Melville or Flaubert, his writing has aged remarkably well because the plot keeps pulling you along. You never get bogged down in pages and pages of descriptions or exposition. You just watch the tale unfold in front of you, as the characters experience them, rapt and eager to see what's next.
I know it's 1200 pages, but I think I'll go back and read the print version because I just enjoyed it so much! This is definitely one for "the best books I've ever read" shelf.


Great swashbuckling fun!! The Count of Monte Cristo was an absolute joy to curl up with this fall. One shouldn't be intimidated by its size, as it is the ultimate page-turning adventure story. So many great lines, so many twists and turns, so many cliff-hangers! Oy! I couldn't wait to see how the story unfolded. Edmond Dantès, one of the greatest characters in literature, will make you truly believe that revenge is a dish best served cold.

A high 4 stars or a low 5 stars - your choice. I thought about 750 pages were 5 stars, 350 pages were 4 stars, leaving another 150 pages something less. Yes, it's very long.
Do I need to say this is a plot-driven novel? With the exception of the title character, this one is short on well-developed characters. (There are many characters, most of which are only one- or two-dimensional.) It's an excellent plot, however, with several rather involved threads to follow. What I thought Dumas did best was to paint his scenes. Right from the very first it felt as if he knew his story was going to be made into a movie. Of course that was impossible as even photography was in its very infancy when he penned this one.
I will be happy to read more Dumas.

I'm beyond the realm of excited and feel transported to not only the world awaiting within the text but also the century in which it was published--when people grasped desperately for the next awaited serialized release of what we of the modern era get to devour in one sitting.
(Well, more like a few sittings with a couple of jumping jacks to get the blood flowing in between. This is sort of the tome length of an encyclopedia after all. Even Marcel Proust might say, "Whoa Nellie.")


Interesting. I don't remember any of the characters, at least not their names (wouldn't have recalled the main character's name if it were not for this thread), but the plot will always be remembered.



Gosh, I'm sorry. I'm a really slow reader and it took me 12 days to read this.

The polls to decide the group reads for April, May, and June are happening now:
https://www.goodreads.com/poll/list/9...

It's never too late to join in on one of the group read book discussions and add your insights -- they always stay open! When you get around to reading The Count, pop into this thread and let us know what you think!


And I agree with Charity; the characters which make up the book make it. I can't remember their names but I do remember what happens to them :-)


One of the characters is a revolutionary and he found the book in a house he and the terrorists/revolutionaries are sheltering in and at one point says:
"That Villefort's a real louse. Just like our court officials!"


After that, I read all Dumas's book that I could find. D'Artagnan was my favorite character, but I liked Edmond Dantes too.
It's true that Dumas is easier to read that other author from the same period.




See Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cou...


Note in paragraph 3, "The invention of the modern serial novel had slightly lower stakes attached: the motivating force wasn’t death at the hands of an angry regent, but newspaper circulation. It was 1836 and a Parisian businessman was trying to figure out how to get subscribers in the habit of buying a daily newspaper instead of the typical weekly. He decided that the best way to hook readers was to include pieces of an original novel in his publication. He approached the most popular novelist of his day, Honorè de Balzac, and the serial novel was born."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categor...



https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
I have to say it read quite like a thriller. I loved it.



I agree with the above comments: the characters are flat, but the plot does move along fairly well for the most part. I think it's a little too long for the plot (I quite enjoy most long books, Les Mis being one of my favorite, but this could have used some editing), but it's not enough to keep me from finishing it. In fact, I like the way the Jim Caviezel film dealt with it, narrowing down the number of characters upon whom Dantes is trying to get revenge and still getting the gist of how he changes from young and sweet to totally vindictive to later trying to account for the overwhelming nature of his vengeance. I wouldn't mind reading this again in a year or two, now that I've got the idea of the overall picture, and keeping a better idea of the characters in my head the second time around.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Count of Monte Cristo (other topics)The State Counsellor: Further Adventures of Fandorin (other topics)
Authors mentioned in this topic
Alexandre Dumas (other topics)Boris Akunin (other topics)