Science Fiction Microstory Contest discussion
July 2023 SCIENCE FICTION MICROSTORY CONTEST (Comments only)
date
newest »



I thought your story was brilliantly funny.
Your image of a homeless community of flying runaway brains was hysterical. The concept reminded me of that 19th century Russian story in which a man's nose has run off and stared its own life.
Well done.

Thank you for making the effort, Greg.
Still on the job search, but am one step close with one wonderful company. Just have to get through a 4 hour interview on Friday. C++ is the hardest and most powerful language, but luckily it is also the one I like most (aside from the one I am creating) and have the most experience in.
Thanks, cause I definitely need it. Writing four separate complex algorithms in a limited time is crazy, but fun...

Great stories so far everyone, very well done!
Tom, thanks for all of the thoughtful reviews you've written over the years. I really appreciate them and you!
Dang, think I failed the second part of the interview. Though it does give me more insight to some aspects of the language I haven't had to use as of yet.



Thanks all. Greg, I love the Moody Blues. Got to see them a few times, including the first back at Jones Beach in 81-82 when I didn't know them by their name, only to find out I loved every song. Best concert ever!
Motion: if a writer posts a critique of your story, it is expected that you provide, however small, a critique of their's .

Seconded.

Very good choice for the theme, Greg. And, powerful sensory imagery. Very mythic and timeless.

Writers' votes are in, but will wait until the end of the 25th to see if we have other members who care to vote.

You never know if a review is useful unless you post it.

Mostly we would want to know how you perceive the story, how it made you feel, what parts you had to stumble over and what you really liked.


Can you tell what the main character wants? Is that clear?
What works in the story? Good lines, vivid imagery, etc. but be specific.
What didn't you understand? Were there key plot elements you either couldn't figure out or had a hard time doing so?
Was attribution of dialogue clear, even when undeclared?
Was the setting clear or did the action seem to occur in a void? What was the weather? (Hemingway said to always include the weather.)
Were pronoun/name relationships immediately clear, and was the name of the character used too often when a pronoun was preferable?
What was the emotional tone of the story: joyful, sad, angry, etc?
One thing I had trouble with but I think is useful was that in these workshops you never respond to the readers' questions. It's not supposed to be a conversation. You basically take in all the criticism, toss out what you don't need, and then try to make the story stronger. You can thank them for the criticism but the best way to do that is offer your own on their work.

J.F. wrote: "I picked up some critiquing ideas at my writing workshop:
Can you tell what the main character wants? Is that clear?
What works in the story? Good lines, vivid imagery, etc. but be specific.
Wha..."
Added this to rule 8:
Writers who have their story critiqued by another writer are expected to provide a critique (however small) of the other's story.
Writers who have their story critiqued by another writer are expected to provide a critique (however small) of the other's story.
Required Elements: Escape, Altruism