Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Questions (not edit requests)
>
Bad bot import
date
newest »




Yes"
Scott wrote: "Yes, the new process is bringing in absolutely every junk record now. You can mark them invalid if you like, but I think it is a waste of time."
Okay, thanks.
I'd run across very few of these in the past. Not going to search for them but when I run across them on author list will probably mark them invalid for the sake of the author and readers.

It is a waste of our time because it will be endless. For every record we remove, two more will appear in its place. Support should deal with it.

Two more will appear anyway. Yes, these should not be imported. I don't know why you're here, but I'm here to help make it easier for users to find books and the information presented is what they need. For this purpose, this junk needs to be marked Invalid. Your purpose may be entirely different.


Then why did you correct an Invalid this morning that had been made by the bot? Why do you correct Proof editions? Why do you do anything, because nothing these days is what you would term "honest" mistakes.

Closing this thread as it's run its course.
Please keep conversations on topic and be mindful of tone when posting within the Group.
Thanks everyone for helping where you can and do!
Please keep conversations on topic and be mindful of tone when posting within the Group.
Thanks everyone for helping where you can and do!
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
(Fire Light Fire Bright) By (author) M L Buchman published on
Imported by bot April 27, 2023. Sort by title of course makes these the first books on list.
https://www.goodreads.com/author/list...
I started to just mark them invalid but then decided to ask is this, like proof copies, something that is becoming common?