Reading the 20th Century discussion

This topic is about
The Constant Nymph
Buddy Reads
>
The Constant Nymph by Margaret Kennedy (October 2023)
date
newest »


https://www.waterstones.com/blog/the-...
Alwynne wrote: "I was fascinated by this article on Waterstone's website in which the writer says that Teresa seduced Lewis listed under the slightly unfortunate sub-heading "Sexy Times"!"
Eww, so much wrong with that article!
Eww, so much wrong with that article!
I've finished. Hmm. I've actually left my original rating of 4 stars unchanged as I got very caught up in this after the slow start BUT was a resistant reader to what I think were Kennedy's authorial intentions. Despite Florence's concern about the optics at the end, I don't think Kennedy was actually troubled by the nature of the Tessa/Lewis relationship, and Florence is more worried of how it may appear than how it might have affected Tessa - very interested to see what other readers think.
I'm conscious that Susan is still reading and I don't think Brian has started this yet so I'm going to put this in spoilers and would appreciate if any replies can also be in spoiler tags: (view spoiler)
I'm conscious that Susan is still reading and I don't think Brian has started this yet so I'm going to put this in spoilers and would appreciate if any replies can also be in spoiler tags: (view spoiler)

I agree emphasis on appearances and not on the impact on such a young girl whatsoever - and the Waterstone's article show that's how it's read by others, all her fault which is so problematic.
(view spoiler)

You're right, I haven't. I'm managing to glimpse at the posts to read the reactions and gloss over the plot details. I have the general picture of the uncomfortable aspects of the nymph theme, but I anticipated that. Also, even some who give it positive reviews have mentioned that its a bit of slow coming out of the gate which should help me weather through any early going slog.
Coincidentally, yesterday I just read the book Daddy-Long-Legs for a 'Back to School" YA theme read in another group. It also has a May-September romance theme. Thankfully, it comes off much better and natural than the movie version which has a 55 year-old Fred Astaire (probably playing someone intended to be much younger) choosing the young girl out at age 17 or 18, allegedly to adopt rather than romance. In the book, the age difference is 14 years and there isn't near the level of creepy grooming that the movie version has.
Glad we haven't spoiled it for you, Brian. I'm amazed that my first review of this book didn't mention the uncomfortable aspects: my updated review is all about them.
But yes, I still think there's much of interest here - not least the tension between what has previously been seen as 'romantic' and what we now deem creepy grooming, as you have termed it. But there are lots of other things that Kennedy is thinking about in the book like art, patronage, creativity etc.
I first heard of Daddy Long-Legs a few years back when an older female friend told me she used to swoon over it as a teenager - I haven't read it myself.
But yes, I still think there's much of interest here - not least the tension between what has previously been seen as 'romantic' and what we now deem creepy grooming, as you have termed it. But there are lots of other things that Kennedy is thinking about in the book like art, patronage, creativity etc.
I first heard of Daddy Long-Legs a few years back when an older female friend told me she used to swoon over it as a teenager - I haven't read it myself.

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
Re: your spoiler R. C. (view spoiler)


I quite liked Daddy-Long-Legs too. And I like your review. Not only does it have me considering reading Dear Enemy even though it is "Back to Orphanage" rather than "Back to School" themed but it also provided me a new addition to my repertoire of writing critique adjectives. I quite like your "light and frothy" description of the main character's epistolary writing style. The image of 'froth' does vividly depict the essence of Judy's letters. An after-dinner dessert read for sure.
My review of DLL: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
That mention of Lea and Chéri (I must re-read some Colette!) is fascinating in this context - and I've just read the very short book by Annie Ernaux about her relationship with a man thirty years younger than her: Le jeune homme/The Young Man which offers up all kinds of different ways of looking at this topic from a contemporary and gendered view.
I am not looking at spoilers, as I am about halfway through this. I agree that there is a lot of what, in modern terms, is obvious grooming. I liked The Feast a lot, this has aged far less well.
I am currently reading, Penhallow by Georgette Heyer and I am struck by the similar family dynamics. In both novels, the second wife (mistress in Constant Nymph - would have been third wife I think) is resented by the children of previous relationships and their child disliked and bullied. It makes me consider how these men seemed to delight in bullying and creating dissent and disharmoney. Neither men seem to have considered what would happen when they died either.
I am currently reading, Penhallow by Georgette Heyer and I am struck by the similar family dynamics. In both novels, the second wife (mistress in Constant Nymph - would have been third wife I think) is resented by the children of previous relationships and their child disliked and bullied. It makes me consider how these men seemed to delight in bullying and creating dissent and disharmoney. Neither men seem to have considered what would happen when they died either.
Yes, definitely don't click on the spoilers, Susan and anyone else still reading till you're done.
I've long had Penhallow on my TBR so thanks for the nudge. Literature does seem to be full of irresponsible and selfish men including fathers who don't take any consideration for their families after they die. Austen is full of them, even when they're still alive!
I've long had Penhallow on my TBR so thanks for the nudge. Literature does seem to be full of irresponsible and selfish men including fathers who don't take any consideration for their families after they die. Austen is full of them, even when they're still alive!

I want to thank all the previous posters on this thread for making comments that reduced my expectations for reading this novel. After perusing the comments before I started, I was a bit wary about reading it.
Instead, I found myself engaged from the start and have not experienced any story lulls or found the nymph aspect that "problematic.' The joy of having expectations surpassed.
I believe the nymph aspect is more muted than I thought it would be because, while Tony may be described in a sexual manner, Tessa has not been quite so portrayed. I realize that will likely come, though. And the involved males, Ike and Lewis, appropriately come off as creeps, though less so Jacob/Ike. Lewis gradually has become more and more unlikeable; Kennedy has deftly handled characterization of this spoiled, arrogant, elitist, entitled artist.
I have enjoyed Kennedy's writing, her characterizations, her setting and her storytelling. To me, she is exhibiting the same talents that she evidenced so well in The Feast and somewhat in Troy Chimneys which showed her skilled writing and characterization but suffered from her creative but 'clunky' storytelling.
Some have mentioned that this story hasn't aged well. Maybe I am enjoying it so much because I haven't either.
Very interesting comments, Brian, that you perhaps haven't found the 'nymph' aspect as problematic as some of us. I'll be interested to see whether that changes by the end of the book...
It's certainly a book just made for discussion.
It's certainly a book just made for discussion.

FINISHED THE BOOK - SPOILERS
While the nymph aspect did become more problematic, it never reached the final level with Tessa. Also Tessa became more sympathetic by the end as Florence got less sympathetic. I very much enjoyed how Kennedy toyed with our attitudes toward these two 'heroines in the latter stages of the story.
And Lewis just became a creepier and crappier person as time went on. I don't think Lewis' actions toward Tessa was portrayed as acceptable even with the general consensus, even by Charles, that Tessa fit better with Lewis than Florence did.
I did accept the age differential as, while still creepy, less creepy in that time period. As Alwynne mentioned in the Annie John thread, perceptions of seduction and childhood have changed even since the 1920s:
"love and how it might manifest markedly different in novels from the 1930s compared to now - what is presented as affection/seduction in 1920s and 1930s romance narratives would now be understood as coercive or obsessive or stalking or in many instances rape. Western notions of childhood as, for example, a time of innocence separate from adulthood is a relatively recent historical invention stemming from the nineteenth century and even then was inflected by class/social status."
To refer to another RTTC read, I did find myself wishing Lewis would get involved in some kind of dispute where he would draw the short straw. Perhaps with Jacob? Win/Win?
My review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
Brian E wrote: "I did find myself wishing Lewis would get involved in some kind of dispute where he would draw the short straw. Perhaps with Jacob? Win/Win?"
Ha, brilliant! 'Drawing the short straw' has a whole other resonance now for those of us who've read Red Pottage 🤩
Ha, brilliant! 'Drawing the short straw' has a whole other resonance now for those of us who've read Red Pottage 🤩
Books mentioned in this topic
Red Pottage (other topics)The Feast (other topics)
Troy Chimneys (other topics)
Penhallow (other topics)
Le jeune homme (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Georgette Heyer (other topics)Margaret Kennedy (other topics)
I seem to recall that Colette makes her 16? - plus there's the ..."
I think she's 15 but iirc the age of consent in France was 13 but need to check.