Horror Aficionados discussion

This topic is about
What Moves the Dead
Group Reads
>
March 2023 Group Read #1 - What Moves the Dead by T. Kingfisher
message 51:
by
Adrienne L
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Feb 28, 2023 06:57PM

reply
|
flag

Well, put, Carrie.

I definitely didn't like (view spoiler)


oh boy…"
Haha controversial can of worms, huh?
To clarify: because I was reading this slower (and reading other things in between) I forgot that there were..."
I definitely understand how you feel. I actually caught myself zoning out during the section talking about pronouns, and explaining everything about being a soldier. I had to reread it a few times and still stumbled on some of the pronouns later on. I understand what the author was trying to do, but for me, it felt very info-dumpy and not natural. So it really took me out of the story. Though it probably has a lot to do with the style of writing in general.
I'm so glad I re-read this one! I feel I was able to pick up on some things that confused me slightly the first read through(view spoiler) This time around, I was able to absorb the information more, and store it away while still progressing along with the story at hand.

oh boy…"
Haha controversial can of worms, huh?
To clarify: because I was reading this slower (and reading other things in between) I forgot..."
Yeah I'm assuming it's going to come off as forced, which in my opinion most of that agenda pushing stuff does nowadays. But I'll keep further opinions on that to myself. Some seem to like an appreciate it so as always I'll keep an open mind!

I definitely didn't like [spoilers removed]"
Yeah, (view spoiler)

I read this at the very end of last year and honestly, I hated it. It felt like reading the textbook of a country I didn't care about. I wish there was more horror in it, because the 7% that was there was really quite good!

I agree, Ophelia. Can't we just take off the rest of life to read?!!
I'm 3/4 of the way through this and it's just not working for me. If it had been written and described as "inspired by" Poe's Usher I could probably take it better, and I keep finding myself thinking of it that way just to get through it. But the superfluous characters and the whole fungus infestation being the cause of the "Fall" - that's just not Poe's tale at all, and it's not doing it for me.




I had the same issue towards the end. I had gotten the hang of ka and kan because it was used throughout, but when the author threw in va and van toward the end I had to take a moment to remember what those pronouns meant. Taking a picture of the explanation was a really good idea.
Damini wrote: "As for the pronouns, it's not the concept of gender non-conforming terms that I have an issue with, it's the number of them. However, I just took a picture of the explanation bit, which I'll use as..."
That annoyed me to no end. I just found it utterly unnecessary and it just added pages and made things more confusing.
That annoyed me to no end. I just found it utterly unnecessary and it just added pages and made things more confusing.
So this was a great big swing and a miss for me. There was much more that annoyed me than I actually enjoyed about the story. I'm just glad it wasn't any longer a book than it was. I probably would have DNFed it.

I'm actually so relieved people agree with me on this! I was feeling like jerk about it haha
I'm ignoring the weird pronouns and just moving along with the story. Don't need the distraction that adds nothing to the story.
WendyB wrote: "I'm ignoring the weird pronouns and just moving along with the story. Don't need the distraction that adds nothing to the story."
I felt that way. I get why they did it at first, but there were so many, and they didn't "need" to be brought up as often as they were, imo.
I felt that way. I get why they did it at first, but there were so many, and they didn't "need" to be brought up as often as they were, imo.

I've decided I like this better as a comedy-horror, and maybe even a rom-com.
Comedic elements include the (view spoiler) Very much a comedy.

I agree, so far it hasn't really seemed relevant to the story whatsoever.
Krystal wrote: "Alan wrote: "Damini wrote: "As for the pronouns, it's not the concept of gender non-conforming terms that I have an issue with, it's the number of them. However, I just took a picture of the explan..."
I was feeling that way too until I saw the comments in this thread heh

It is SO confusing. In fact, I spotted an erroneous usage somewhere, which is incredibly ironic.



I've decided I like this better as a comedy-horror, and maybe even a rom-com.
Comedic elements inc..."
Yes, I'm only about a quarter of the way through right now, but I'm really enjoying the humor! There's a subtle dry sense of humor throughout.

Hey LTJ! I look forward to hearing what you think. :)




hahaha. I believe autocorrect got you again. We can only hope the spinach, tomatoes and feta would improve them.
Finished. Well that was... interesting? Had a creepy feel to it yet there were things that distracted from the story such as the weird pronouns and even the somewhat frequent mentions of some unknown country and being a soldier.

One of the things I love about this author is their voice. I feel like that was totally lost in this story for the sake of the "Writing Style". I wish the story had been brought to more current times in terms of style. I felt like they were trying so hard to make the story feel like Poe's work they lost themselves and created something that, in my opinion, still can't quite compare to the original.
I did end up liking the second half much better than the first, but it was still hard to really care about the characters because I didn't feel much of a connection to any of them. I even had a hard time remembering who was who throughout. These are things that normally aren't lacking in Kingfisher's books. And yet again, I think it was because of the choice of writing style.
Lastly, not to beat a dead horse, but I'm going to bring up the pronouns again. By the time I got to the end, I actually understood why so many pronouns were used. I ACTUALLY liked the idea of this and thought it was clever. But, again, I don't feel like it was executed as well as it could have been. It did come off as a little preachy and forced at first mention, at least to me. I personally don't like this feeling in a speculative fiction book, regardless of if I view the world the same as the author or not.
Gah! So frustrating. OK. Rant over. For now...

I've decided I like this better as a comedy-horror, and maybe even a rom-com.
Comedic elements inc..."
If you liked The Hollow Places you might enjoy The Twisted Ones as well. I much preferred that to this one.

Yes, predictability was another issue I found with this one. Right from the get-go, I felt it was obvious where things were going. That being said, I didn't mind this new twist to the story, if only it had been written differently.

Ash wrote: "Netanella wrote: "I'm torn with this book. I loved Kingfisher's The Hollow Places, but this one. . . not so much.
I've decided I like this better as a comedy-horror, and maybe even a rom-com.
Co..."
Loved both of these!
I've decided I like this better as a comedy-horror, and maybe even a rom-com.
Co..."
Loved both of these!


Same here. still debating whether we'll pick up this book.

The only actual thing that I did find confusing was Beatrix Potter showing up with literally all of the answers.

This was a 4/5 read for me and I was surprised at how much I enjoyed it. I wasn't sure how I would feel about a retelling of one of my favorite Poe stories.

Beatrix Potter threw me just a bit as well. But I figure this is a fictional world with mad hares. Why wouldn't she be there ... studying mushrooms? 😅
I'm in agreement that the pronouns didn't bother me. If I tried to use them, I'd probably mess them up! But reading them didn't pull me out of the story at all.