Tournament of Books discussion

This topic is about
An Island
2023 TOB General
>
An Island
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Bretnie
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Dec 18, 2022 07:38PM

reply
|
flag

I finished this a few weeks ago and already I'm forgetting details. Things I remembered:
I LOVED the cover art. It's mesmerizing, mysterious, eye-catching, gorgeous - it was the best thing about this book.
The framing device of a guy washing up on shore was not at all important the story and I was annoyed by that because I expected that to be important. All we need is for Samuel to be an old guy living somewhere isolated so that he spends all his time in his memories. We don't need a mysterious stranger who does not speak the language.
I was excessively distracted by trying to guess where this was really set (and where the mysterious guy with the "guttural language" was from). Why didn't Jennings just pick a real place? I thought that weakened this book, it made all the described atrocities imaginary, since the place is imaginary. I think she was trying to show that this could happen anywhere in Africa, but that didn't work for me.
I'm guessing the point was to show us how miserable Samuel's life was, but the result was that this was a miserable book that I did not enjoy.


First, I'll second the appreciation of the cover. I think it is the best in the tournament. And yet it didn't make either of the "best covers of 2022" that I stumbled across.
As for the castaway - I really think that's what makes the difference for this book. That is, if the castaway plot didn't resonate, then I agree, the book probably won't either.
The castaway plot: a refugee comes ashore near dead, the host feels the normal human sympathy, but doesn't understand the refugee and worries about what risks he might bring - either as himself or from the forces driving him to flee. The uncertainty of their communication and our host's fears about his motives (and a little bit his fears of having to share his home) lead to an act of violence. When we see it play out on the level of two individuals, it seems both awful and tragic.
But that plot directly echoes the plot in the lighthouse keeper's past - with refugees coming to his country and first being tolerated, and then welcomed as they begin to contribute, and then destroyed out of an unwarranted paranoia about what they are taking away from the native peoples.
The parallels between the large past events and the small current events of the story allow us to take a tired story of unwanted refugees and enable us to see it with new eyes. Putting both those plots together shows us how external forces drive weak but not intrinsically bad people into these terrible acts.

I did not put this together at all but I think its such a excellent observation. Thanks for shifting my perspective on it a bit.


I also think this book is an interesting compare & contrast with 2 a.m. in Little America.


You can extend it out to the European colonizers driving the native peoples - including Samuel's family - off their land, and also down to the level of Samuel's chickens always attacking and trying to drive off his poor red hen. Is it just in the natural order of things to be in opposition, often violently, to what we identify as the Other, even if it is not harming us? Including that chickens subplot makes me suspicious she's taking a pretty bleak view of reality.

Wow I didn't even see the parallel with the chickens.

Oh, yes. Bleak!
The ending is heartbreaking.


Tim, your observations are spot on and they also add to my admiration for this author and her structuring of this book.


