Ultimate Popsugar Reading Challenge discussion
2023 Challenge - Regular
>
17 - A Book With a Love Triangle
date
newest »


..."
I think some of the data for US published books was populated by a metadata feed, so it might not be a librarian's fault. I seem to remember they did a massive data migration in the distant past which messed up a lot of editions. I don't tend to bother fixing books that aren't on my shelves unless someone asks, since it takes time to go look up what they should be. So I would probably just ignore something like that.
As a non-American I'm happy that they let us have the UK descriptions on UK editions though.
Ellie wrote: "Nadine in NY wrote: ""This title has been removed from sale by Penguin Group, USA." Um, WHAT? First of all , what kind of crappy blurb is that, what is wrong w/ GR librarians for letting THAT fly?
..."
I did not know any of that! thanks for the explanation :-) I'm calm now haha
..."
I did not know any of that! thanks for the explanation :-) I'm calm now haha

While they might not all be involved erotically with all of them, they are certainly power-dynamically involved with each other.
Is it love? it is on O's part.
Would also work for a book with only text on the cover.


I really dislike love triangles. I've only ever read one book series where I thought it worked out well - The Infernal Devices. So I was glad to have found a light love triangle here. This one is understandable because of who John and Michael are to each other, and because of plot events, it's melodramatic for reasons other than the love triangle itself.
The London House is a perfect fit for this prompt. Wonderful if you love historical fiction with a mystery!





If anyone is looking for a book that is decidedly NOT a romance, I just read a rather short and very depressing book set in Barbados that - to my surprise - had a love triangle as part of the plot: How the One-Armed Sister Sweeps Her House

A short classic that I mentioned a bit ago in another post, The Return of the Soldier is about a soldier in WWI suffering from shell shock and amnesia who has forgotten his wife and pines for his first love.
Also, in the nonfiction realm without being mostly about the romance, I can highly recommend Alexander Hamilton. It's giant, but it was really good (and you can sing Hamilton songs the whole way through!). Just a love triangle or two that changed American history...

As much as I like the Twilight books, those are such easy defaults when it comes to the topic of a love triangle.
I'm trying for something different.

As much as I like the Twilight books, those are such easy defaults when it comes to the topic of a love trian..."
Not sure how accurate the book is, but there's Nemesis: The True Story of Aristotle Onassis, Jackie O, and the Love Triangle That Brought Down the Kennedys
.
I also found this true crime book: The Gilded Edge: Two Audacious Women and the Cyanide Love Triangle That Shook America
.
You also could probably make a case for The Secret History of Wonder Woman too.

Wow, really? Oh that's excellent then. Thanks.

The Woman Who Named God: Abraham's Dilemma and the Birth of Three Faiths
American Eve: Evelyn Nesbit, Stanford White, the Birth of the "It" Girl and the Crime of the Century
Under the Banner of Heaven: A Story of Violent Faith
Thunderstruck
Diana wrote: "You also could probably make a case for The Secret History of Wonder Woman too. ..."
Yes, this book would work perfectly.
Yes, this book would work perfectly.

This one sounds pretty interesting. I'll look into it.


Although it is a historical fiction, it is well researched and interesting about Katharine Parr's life before she became queen. One of the author's best fiction books, I think.

If neither of these is a really satisfying fit I can always go for The Hunger Games, or I found an interesting looking historical fiction called Nothing Sung and Nothing Spoken, which apparently has a love triangle in it (if anyone has read it please confirm!).

It has been awhile since I read it, but I would vote yes for Oryx and Crake.


Beth O'Leary. Quirky Londoner Tiffy is desperate to find a new flat and lovable palliative care nurse Leon offers her an affordable solution when he rents out his flat and bed to her to use while he’s working nightshift. Their friendship grows gradually through a series of post-it notes since they are never actually in the flat at the same time. ⭐⭐⭐⭐ here is my review

Although it is a historical fiction, it is well..."
I got as far as--I can't even remember who it was--telling Katherine Parr to "go f*ck herself" before I put down the book. Lol I had to go and find my full review of it:
"It was a DNF. When a a teenager in 16th century England told Katharine to 'go fuck herself' that's when I put down the book. Is it 1535 or 2021? That phrase wasn't even used until the 19th century. It really seems that the only good book in this series was Catherine of Aragon, obviously Alison's favorite Tudor Queen. All the rest were marred by blatant hatred (Anne Boleyn), falsities (Anne Boleyn), sheer lack of personality (Jane Seymour), rumor and/or factual inconsistencies (Anne of Kleves, Katherine Howard). This series could have been so much more."

Not saying it didn't exist, perhaps we read different editions, because what did leap out at me was the much less dramatic 'don't go there', which was certainly not C16th speak. and oddly enough neither phrase is Alison Weir'sl normal style. They did have the F word in the sixteenth century, but I agree unlikely in that context and by a teenager to an adult.


Not only had I forgotten it, I'd forgotten I actually looked up the etymology of the F word at the time I came across that particular sentence! It was around in the sixteenth century, so I think I decided it could possibly have been used in that context, as the stepson was a difficult boy at that particular time. However, I agree with you that it doesn't read right.
The trouble with using a more obviously sixteenth century swear word (and there were a lot) is that it would come across as a ruder version of 'Gadzooks' or similar. I think it would have been better to have had the stepson make a rude gesture which could be left to the reader's imagination.
I think because of all that, it didn't bother me as much as the use of 'don't go there', which seems such a modern expression in the context it was used in the book. It could easily have been replaced by something like 'don't speak of that', which would have been a possible C16 phrase and doesn't sound too dated.

This! Having a 16th century teen say GFY took me completely out of the story. It would have been incredibly disrespectful (and yeah teens are always disrespectful to their parents no matter the era!) but he wouldn’t have dared. I agree, a rude gesture would have been more accurate than GFY.
To everyone else I’m so sorry I hijacked this thread.


Sarah wrote: "I think I'm actually gonna go for The Hunger Games for this. The first book has the love triangle already, right? (I've never read the books and I think I've seen...2 of the 3 movies..."
Yes it does. And my daughter and I disagree completely on who Katniss should have ended up with.
Yes it does. And my daughter and I disagree completely on who Katniss should have ended up with.

The Love Match by Priyanka Taslim


Givhan is a BIPOC author, and I would describe this as a magical realism thriller, drawing on both Hispanic and Hoodoo traditions. It definitely fits as a love triangle.
I didn't see the whodunit coming on this one, I have to admit.


..."
The Seduction of the Crimson Rose definitely fits—(view spoiler) .
Likewise The Deception of the Emerald Ring has (view spoiler) .
The Secret History of the Pink Carnation itself qualifies in a way, (view spoiler) .
Jane's book The Lure of the Moonflower qualifies, too, since she is torn between (view spoiler) .
And the The Masque of the Black Tulip has a triangle, though I forget their names now. Edited to add: (view spoiler)

How is this even a question?! 😂

Edited to add: I ended up reading Sad Cypress for this prompt. There's definitely a love triangle and it's a great book!

I enjoyed it, but I think, in general, I enjoy the tragedies and histories considerably more.


My (unpopular) opinion:
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

Books mentioned in this topic
An American Marriage (other topics)An Excess Male (other topics)
It Ends with Us (other topics)
Tomorrow, and Tomorrow, and Tomorrow (other topics)
New Moon (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Tayari Jones (other topics)Gabrielle Zevin (other topics)
Jennifer Givhan (other topics)
Alison Weir (other topics)
Beth O'Leary (other topics)
More...
[book:The S..."
I love that series but I don't remember love triangles. I went to the book page to try to refresh my memory and found THIS as the "blurb" for Pink Carnation: "This title has been removed from sale by Penguin Group, USA." Um, WHAT? First of all , what kind of crappy blurb is that, what is wrong w/ GR librarians for letting THAT fly? put the damned book description in, please - this book is still available in libraries & second hand stores, we aren't all using GR to shop for new books, despite what Amazon may wish.
And SECONDLY: What's going on there??????? I know someone else plagiarized her book, and that other book was pulled from sale, but why is this book pulled? Is Willig renegotiating her contracts or something? I hope it's something like that.
NOTE: switching to other editions, such as mass market from Berkley, did give me a proper blurb. I don't understand different editions have different blurbs and I wish GR would fix that. The only reason for it to be different is if you switch to another language.
Speaking of other languages, it is highly annoying when ALL the English editions default to blurbs in another language.