Reading the 20th Century discussion

This topic is about
Prisoner's Base
Buddy Reads
>
Prisoner's Base by Celia Fremlin (December 2022)
date
newest »

I've done a Nigeyb and gone early on this - just felt like I needed some Fremlin in my life!
I won't say anything for now just that Claudia is probably Fremlin's best worst character that I've read so far - and that's saying something ;)
Looking forward to discussing this next month.
I won't say anything for now just that Claudia is probably Fremlin's best worst character that I've read so far - and that's saying something ;)
Looking forward to discussing this next month.
I am about three quarters of the way through this now, RC. Fremlin is, as always, brilliant. Claudia sends a shiver down my spine!
Fremlin rules 🤩
Still hoping to track down a modestly priced copy of this, although now I have two Netgalley books to read and a real world book group choice, I'm feeling under pressure
Still hoping to track down a modestly priced copy of this, although now I have two Netgalley books to read and a real world book group choice, I'm feeling under pressure
I won't even tell you how many NetGalley books I have, Nigeyb. I didn't even request some, they just arrived in my inbox and I didn't have the self-will required to say no to most of them!

Still hoping to track down a modestly priced copy of this, although now I have two Netgalley books to read and a real world book group choice, I'm feeling under pressure"
If you don't mind reading online, there's a copy to borrow at archive.org it's a free library site so just need an account, no fees.


My heart was in my throat the last several pages. This might be favorite Fremlin yet.
Good to hear you enjoyed it, WndyJW. I agree that she is sadly not as well known as she should be. She's such an impressive writer.

There was still mounting tension, but not until almost the end.
My review:
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
** Spoilers **
WndyJW wrote: "... and Claudia is a strangleable character! "
Haha, exactly the word we need, Wendy!
Claudia is an absolute stand-out character, so vile, so self-satisfied, so wrong, so lacking in any kind of self-awareness. And yet, she's not one-dimensional because her intentions are genuinely good: she really does want to help the needy, even if it is a form of narcissism and a way of feeding her own ego.
For all the good stuff, this was only 3 stars for me because I felt like Fremlin was trying to artificially insert a spookiness that wasn't really there: the nightmares, for example, which go nowhere and the almost comic story of Maurice. Even the end fizzles out as he's so hapless and Helen so sensible that there's no real sense of jeopardy.
But that was a shock about poor Margaret at the end :((
WndyJW wrote: "... and Claudia is a strangleable character! "
Haha, exactly the word we need, Wendy!
Claudia is an absolute stand-out character, so vile, so self-satisfied, so wrong, so lacking in any kind of self-awareness. And yet, she's not one-dimensional because her intentions are genuinely good: she really does want to help the needy, even if it is a form of narcissism and a way of feeding her own ego.
For all the good stuff, this was only 3 stars for me because I felt like Fremlin was trying to artificially insert a spookiness that wasn't really there: the nightmares, for example, which go nowhere and the almost comic story of Maurice. Even the end fizzles out as he's so hapless and Helen so sensible that there's no real sense of jeopardy.
But that was a shock about poor Margaret at the end :((
Jill wrote: "I thought the ending was good as she left it so you could please yourself"
What do you mean, Jill?
What do you mean, Jill?
Me neither, Jill :) I used to be able to, but I've forgotten. Yes, Mavis just blurted out the news, but I was also unsure whether to believe her.

Yes I think she gave us a choice
Ok, just reread the end but for me, there's no ambiguity - Claudia has already recognised what's happened - Helen's just young and refusing to accept what she's been told. It hadn't even occurred to me that there was another way of reading this.
To do spoilers: <*spoiler>blah blah blah<*/spoiler> - but remove the asterisks.
To do spoilers: <*spoiler>blah blah blah<*/spoiler> - but remove the asterisks.

I didn’t find the ending ambiguous, I thought it was clear what happened and every Fremlin book ends with a murder.

Thank you. That was our previous dog who died two years ago. We now have another German Shepherd, Two years old now but is still very much a pup in her attitude.

Maybe the last two pages ending will grow on me over time.
Maybe not.
Here's my review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
Yes, Fremlin adds a shade of ambiguity to the ending by having Mavis be the prime relayer of information. I think Fremlin's just playing around with us and that its actually clear what happened, a conclusion that is reinforced by the tone of the last sentence. Poor Helen.
Interesting review, Brian. Sounds like we're all agreed that the real pull of this one is the love-to-hate-her Claudia: a tremendous piece of character creation from Fremlin.
I think one of my issues is that Fremlin tries a bit over-hard to force this into a domestic noir mould which doesn't quite fit the story.
What did everyone think about Maurice? I was amused when we found out the truth about him and especially that he went to stay with his mother every weekend but it did all feel a bit silly at the same time.
I think one of my issues is that Fremlin tries a bit over-hard to force this into a domestic noir mould which doesn't quite fit the story.
What did everyone think about Maurice? I was amused when we found out the truth about him and especially that he went to stay with his mother every weekend but it did all feel a bit silly at the same time.
I found it interesting that all the women wanted Maurice to be an ex-prisoner and flirt with danger. It was bizarre really, but you couldn't blame him taking advantage.
I wondered how Margaret raised such a daft daughter. She seemed so lovely and sensible.
I wondered how Margaret raised such a daft daughter. She seemed so lovely and sensible.

While my wife thinks that in her experience "the apple doesn't fall far from the tree" I have found that is often not true. Sometimes, nature wins the battle with nurture and it's often a nature that must have been recessive in previous generations.
My kids have sometimes exhibited some strange head-scratching personality traits that cause my wife and I to wonder "where'd they get that from?" When that occurs, we comfort ourselves with the assurance that "it couldn't be from me. Nobody in my family ever behaved like that."
Susan wrote: "I found it interesting that all the women wanted Maurice to be an ex-prisoner and flirt with danger."
Yes, that was amusing - and was enough to make me question Maurice. Not to mention his 1000 sonnets ;)
On Claudia, I thought that Fremlin was exploring generational and cultural differences. She mentions a couple of times that Claudia is a child of the 1960s, with all her nonsense about Freudian repression and how 'reactionary' i.e. sensible Margaret is.
It's interesting because usually I would be on the side of the younger generation but Claudia is so obnoxious that I'm not. It's interesting too that Helen is a throwback to sensible Margaret with none of her mother's silliness.
It reminded me slightly of Agatha Christie's grumpy 1960s books only here Fremlin makes us reject the new for the 'traditional' as well.
Yes, that was amusing - and was enough to make me question Maurice. Not to mention his 1000 sonnets ;)
On Claudia, I thought that Fremlin was exploring generational and cultural differences. She mentions a couple of times that Claudia is a child of the 1960s, with all her nonsense about Freudian repression and how 'reactionary' i.e. sensible Margaret is.
It's interesting because usually I would be on the side of the younger generation but Claudia is so obnoxious that I'm not. It's interesting too that Helen is a throwback to sensible Margaret with none of her mother's silliness.
It reminded me slightly of Agatha Christie's grumpy 1960s books only here Fremlin makes us reject the new for the 'traditional' as well.

Do we all agree that as good as most Fremlin books are her endings seem rather abrupt and sometimes anticlimactic or is that just me? I don’t read them for the mystery, although for one brief moment I wondered if Margaret was the psychopath and Fremlin was getting one over on us, I read them for the characters and the lives of housewives.
Regarding Margaret, raising the insufferable Claudia and the delightful Helen, some kids are just bad eggs.
I would agree that her endings are often a little strange. I read her books far more for the journey than the destination.
Yes, I'd agree with Susan. It is a characteristic of older books, that they seem to wind things up pretty abruptly, almost as if they've run out of words!
Celia Fremlin's sixth novel Prisoner's Base (1967) served further proof of her mastery at uncovering anxieties and even terrors in the domestic sphere. It tells of grandmother Margaret, her daughter Claudia, and Claudia's daughter Helen, who share a home from which Claudia's husband is frequently absent. Claudia has a penchant for taking strangers under her wing and into the house, the danger being that they never leave. But a different danger is proposed by Maurice, a self-styled poet who boasts that he has served seven years in prison for manslaughter.