Western Authors & Readers discussion
How racy is too racy?
date
newest »


Like you I think a hint is enough.
Otherwise I'd feel the story would be drifting into different waters altogether.
Unless the novel was supposed to be an explicit 19th century version of FSOG I'd personally leave it as you're doing it.
Cheers.

In my first western Last Stand, I had a fairly graphic sex scene that was necessary since the women used sex to get information that was necessary for the protagonist to save the day. While it did not dip into erotica, it was detailed enough to play the scene out. In all my reviews and emails, I have only received one email that was uncomfortable with it. My take away is that if it crucial to the plot then you can get away with it, but I wouldn’t go throwing sex scenes in just to spice things up. I hope that helps.
Take Care,
Duane

In my first western Last Stand, I had a fairly graphic sex scene that was necessary since the women used sex to get information that was necessary for the protagonist to save the day. Whi..."
Thanks Duane, good advice.


I don't see any reason to be any more explicit than what McMurtry did with the sex in Lonesome Dove. It might be different if you were specifically writing western erotica, but otherwise, I think being too explicit takes the focus away from the rest of the plot and may actually seem incongruent with the narrative voice of the novel. So far, in my own two novels, there has only been the need to suggest the activity took place, with no real advantage to be had by going any further with the description.


Those who want to take a peek into how western writing used to be up till just a few years ago might like to begin by reading these three 2009 articles: Sex, Violence -- And Boredom and Defending Faith a Futile Exercise (both www.blackhorsewesterns.com/bhe16), and Our First Paperback Original (www.blackhorsewesterns.com/bhe15). The novel Misfit Lil Cheats the Hangrope is now also available through Amazon as a Kindle ebook.
If you are writing for a particular publisher or market, the best advice always has been to look closely at (i.e. read intensively) work that has already met with success in that quarter.

Thanks Chap. I'll have to get my hands on one of the Blackhorse novels.

I was pleased to read that you got the point, Robert. Also in your explanation that you are not so much interested in sales as in writing for "artistic reasons." Perhaps sadly, some of us have had to rely on writing or editing of one sort or another for a living during entire working lives and on into our semi-retirements. Thus when it comes to genre fiction, we need to take a commercial line and write what is readily understood by publishers and the general reader. This means we can't afford too much experimentation with punctuation and grammar. Or to make mistake after mistake. Although I agree with some of what you and others say about the freedoms presented by the likes of KDP and Smashwords, I'm sorry to have to report finding many self-published ebooks disappointing. The only light of day some would have seen in former times would have been deservedly brief, perhaps on being perused by a publisher's editor working through the unsolicited "slush pile." And those who self-published through the infamous vanity presses ended up with attics and garages filled with boxes of expensive, unsellable books. Today, of course, all readers can have the pleasure of seeing the mistakes in ebooks without spending a fortune. The flip side of this is that the vast volume of unworthy material listed on sites such as Amazon's makes it very difficult for the average buyer to come across the hidden gems. The buyer also tends to become once bitten, twice shy when making subsequent purchases; some won't spend more than a dollar for a whole novel from a writer who is new to them.

In my own writing, I've hesitated. I think I'm capable of writing such, but I believe the people who read my books aren't nearly as interested in reading such scenes.
Interesting note: one of my female beta readers bothered me throughout the first four of my historical fiction novels for not having enough tension. When I finally turned the heat up, she still wasn't happy!

I've agonized similarly however over explicit language, and have opted to write whatever is in my head. To the extent that I've told potential readers, "Look, my bad guys are bad guys. And my good guys aren't all that good, either. SO I hope language isn't an issue..."
I imagine it's the same. If I was writing "a soiled dove," well, I'd want to make sure she had some dirt on her hands, so to speak...


Also, "tension" does not mean "sex scenes" unless you mean "sexual tension." And usually that is not explicit--just the feeling. Some books (some of mine, for instance) have ONLY sexual tension...and apparently readers like my work because I've just published my 25th novel ("The Lone Sheriff") and I'm getting fan letters. (Though this work has two love scenes--not "sex" scenes--I mean real love scenes, with high emotion and tenderness.
Lynna Banning
I bring this up because my novels generally have one or two soiled doves as characters, but I've never gotten graphic about it. What would the purpose be for having an explicit scene in a novel?