The Mookse and the Gripes discussion
Women's Prizes
>
2022 WP longlist - The Paper Palace
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Hugh, Active moderator
(new)
Mar 08, 2022 02:38AM
Mod
The Paper Palace by Miranda Cowley Heller
reply
|
flag
I suspect this book may be too melodramatic to appeal to lots of people in this group, but I devoured it. I was surprised to learn it was the author’s debut, until I read she was also a book editor. Not surprised at all to see this here.
Did she say why? Anna James is an excellent author - don’t know about her taste in books so much as never watch the videos.
Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer wrote: "Did she say why? Anna James is an excellent author - don’t know about her taste in books so much as never watch the videos."
There were themes which she felt uncomfortable with
Eve and Cindy - I think I have noticed a DNF and a bottom ranking respectively ........... what were your issues here?
This was a DNF for me. The opening chapter was beautiful, but I found the rest of the book overwrought and drowning in unnecessary detail. And I did not appreciate the almost flippant / joking manner with which it deals with heavy topics (such as child abuse). An excerpt:"I was in a rage because [my mother] had given Anna money to buy a new lip gloss at Gimbels, while I stayed home and did chores. "Oh, for heaven's sake, Elle," she said as I stood at the kitchen sink, fuming over a pile of dishes. "You have to wash a plate... you don't get lipstick. I had to give my stepfather blow jobs. All Austin had to do was masturbate him. What can I tell you? Life's not fair."
I’m listening to it right now- it’s not really my cup of tea, but okay. I don’t know that I’d call it literary, but I can see why it’s on the list, as it is firmly women’s fiction.
Tracy wrote: "I’m listening to it right now- it’s not really my cup of tea, but okay. I don’t know that I’d call it literary, but I can see why it’s on the list, as it is firmly women’s fiction."
The WP is not a literary prize - it's to celebrate Women's fiction but to be honest these will never make the longlist and it evolves into a literary shortlist. With the WP I usually wait until the shortlist, that's when the gems stick out.
WndyJW wrote: "I feel it sometimes just the winner that shines."I feel that but they've been very consistent with that - to date there are only three Winners I do not like (a spell of winter, The Idea of Perfection and On Beauty), I think that's pretty good
Well, that went from okay to not. Again, I can see why it’s on the list, but just not for me. The purple prose, the characters, and the glib treatment of serious situations were the main reasons I disliked it. I finished it, so I gave it two stars.
Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer wrote: "Eve and Cindy - I think I have noticed a DNF and a bottom ranking respectively ........... what were your issues here?"First, and this will surprise no one, I found most (not all) of the characters completely unlikeable. Usually that's enough for me to dislike a novel.
Second, I found the book to be massively over-written and in desperate need of real, honest and talented editing.
Third, the ending was dreadful.
So yes, I have placed it at #16 and hope very much that nothing else on the longlist is as bad.
I give you credit for reading all the way to the end, Cindy. I can’t make myself read a book I don’t like so I end up avoiding it, but I don’t read anything else if I haven’t officially given up on the book.
Cindy wrote: "Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer wrote: "Eve and Cindy - I think I have noticed a DNF and a bottom ranking respectively ........... what were your issues here?"First, and this will surprise no one..."
Depends on the dislikeable character - I know you're a fan of Philip Roth, who creates convincing awful characters.
I did order this book solely on the fact that it was disliked by a certain booktuber - saying that, and I shouldn't judge, it was part of Reese Witherspoon's book club, never, ever a good sign.
What did you hate about the ending Cindy - may be worth putting the answer with spoiler tags around it
I think I can answer that without spoilers GY. Two reasons mostly: first, I think the ending is sufficiently ambiguous to be actually annoying. I read in one interview that the author was surprised that people found the ending unclear, but I know that I am not alone in feeling that way about it. And second, more subjectively, to the extent that I think I know how the novel ended, I think it's simply the wrong outcome for many reasons and deeply unsatisfying as a result.
That makes perfect sense - for me it was also the way the ending kept changing I think this may end a 2 star for me - which means its a long way from the bottom of my list
And what's with having a dig at Jennifer Egan?I cannot find the exact quote but the acerbic mother (I think) says, with a novel in her hand, "Manhattan and Beach - how can two such exciting words be so dull when put together"
My thoughts attachedI went 2.5*
That still puts it on my current shorlist (6th out of 9 read)
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer wrote: "And what's with having a dig at Jennifer Egan?I cannot find the exact quote but the acerbic mother (I think) says, with a novel in her hand, "Manhattan and Beach - how can two such exciting words..."
I forgot about that. Another reason to dislike the book. Manhattan Beach is actually my favorite of Egan's novels!
Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer wrote: "Hah - we finally disagree. Her latest (out some time soon) and it’s prequel Goon Squad for me."Disagreement every once in a while is ok. I read both Good Squad and Candy House (it's out at the beginning of April in the US but I got an ARC a few months ago) and those just aren't for me. I know they have a huge following though, and I think she's a very talented writer.
Disagreement every once in a while is good. I was wondering if you were the same person and, inspired by Wendy's comments on Louise Erdrich, suggest a DNA test. Although last time I did one of those turned out I was apparently the same person as Gumble's Yard - very confusing.
Man this was bad. The worst of the nine I've read so far. Not only is every character a cliché, it's the same cliché in multiple characters: every women is defined by her relationships and /or motherhood, all mothers are horrible, all stepmothers are worse and all man are weak. Oh, and the sex scenes are ridiculous (women have earth-shattering orgasms when you pinch their clitoris as hard as possible? Really now?). Plus: it doesnt mean a character is interesting just because horrible stuff happens to her/him.
Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer wrote: "I am still trying to remember why I rounded the 2.5 stars up"Maybe you were in a magnanimous mood?
I think it was two thingsI was being so negative about the WP I had already given three 1 stars from around 6 books
There were a few pieces of clever writing I liked - a little like how in ballets different characters (the Lilac fairy, von Rothbart) have their own themes, the characters here have themes associated with their appearance
But I am rounding down now
I just finished this and also thought it was awful. Cindy, I didn't find the ending ambiguous - I thought it was spelt out pretty clearly who she chose. However, totally agree that it was the wrong outcome although frankly I didn't care one bit about Elle by that point, so wasn't that invested.
I finished this book this weekend. It’s the second book of this year’s long list that I have read. In the past when a book is recommended by Reese Witherspoon’s book club, I have disliked the book. And that held true once again.
I felt that a lot of the writing was sensationalist, the characters seemed fairly one dimensional and I wasn’t invested in anyone particularly. I was waiting for some earth shattering twist at the end that would somehow justify the immense effort of reading the book, and it’s WP nomination. But that didn’t happen.
Disappointed.


