Goodreads Authors/Readers discussion
Author Resource Round Table
>
Editing in another medium
date
newest »



I write on my desktop computer and edit on a Kindle. I use Calibre to convert it to an EPUB and load it directly from the computer to the Kindle, including the cover, so it'll look like a finished book. Seems to work well for me.

I do this too. Write with Scrivener, then load onto Kindle and read, highlighting and making notes on the areas that need fixing. I go through those and revise in Scrivener.

That's true. I'm seeing a lot of issues with books lately, for instance, it's raining, but 2 seconds later the sun is blinding someone. How does no one catch that? I'm not sure I could read the whole book out loud, but if I can at least hit dialogue and parts that just don't sit right with me, I'm happy.


I not only try some dialogue out loud, but sometimes I act things out to get a sense of the character's body language, facial expressions and emotional experiences so I can write them. Yes, I do this alone. No one sees or hears me. :)


I was stage-struck at the age of three, and I still am. I always hoped to be an actor, until I realised I actually wanted to write the words the actors said. Now, as authors, we have the best of both worlds. Every book takes place on the stage or screen located in the mind, just behind the middle of the forehead.

Well, I do like the "throwing everyone out of the house" part. LOL

I do that (act out) sometimes too. Usually, during my long commute alone in the car. I've also recorded myself reading about ten chapters. It was exhausting, but enlightening.


http://www.anthonyhillbooks.com


Whatever your preferred method of composition it’s a good idea to do the editing … or at any event the proof-reading … in another medium. If you compose on screen, print out the text and read it in hard copy. If you’re a pen and paper person, send an electronic version to yourself and read it on screen.
We all know the problem: after constantly re-reading the work, the mind begins to see what ought to be there, rather than what is on the page. By changing the format in which we edit or proof-read, the eye looks at the words differently – as if seeing them for the first time – and errors, repetitions and typos that were glossed over are properly noticed.
For the past 15 years or so I’ve been composing directly onto the computer keyboard: but I still print every version for editing. With the advent of the tablet, I’ve been sending the final second draft to myself by email to read on the iPad.
And I still find a dozen or more changes to make in each of the chapters. Awkward sentences. Words left in from previous edits. Words left out. Repetitions. Americanisms (if you’ll forgive me) that the wretched spell-checker has let in the back door when I prefer standard English. Labour. Harbour. Defence. Theatre. And so on. The constant battle with the grammar monitor (which won’t allow me to turn it off) over my stylistic preference for the occasional fragmented sentence and dangling participle.
Such matters can often glance off the retina when looked at for the umpteenth time on the page or computer screen. But they leap out at me on the iPad, and I return to the manuscript with another set of corrections.
I can recommend wholeheartedly this tip for editing and proofing in a medium that’s not your usual writing one. And even then mistakes still get through. Just ask your editor.