On Paths Unknown discussion

This topic is about
In the Night Garden
IN THE NIGHT GARDEN - Valente
>
Introduction : In the Night Garden by Catherynne M. Valente
Goodie! I'd just put an arbitrary date down. It can easily be changed to whatever time you guys find most convenient. :)

Allen wrote: "Sounds like Bradbury's "Dandelion Wine" ... and yes, I'm a Bradbury-holic ... Interestingly, Valente has a story in this month's issue Clarkesworld. Weird, and a bit Alice-like. I haven't finished ..."
You can maybe link us in the Unusual Book thread or the Anything Goes thread, Allen? ...or does one have to be subscribed?
Mark, if you wait long enough, we might get to the sequel - but as you can see from our bookshelves, we still have miles to go before we sleep.
You can maybe link us in the Unusual Book thread or the Anything Goes thread, Allen? ...or does one have to be subscribed?
Mark, if you wait long enough, we might get to the sequel - but as you can see from our bookshelves, we still have miles to go before we sleep.

I have this book and its sequel, and I would like to read and discuss, yes. Thanks for the invitation. Cheers :)
T.D. wrote: "Traveller wrote: "Allen wrote: "Sounds like Bradbury's "Dandelion Wine" ... and yes, I'm a Bradbury-holic ... Interestingly, Valente has a story in this month's issue Clarkesworld. Weird, and a bit..."
Oh, nice, that'd be great, T.D! I personally don't have the sequel yet, but if you guys vote for it, we could try and fit the sequel in somewhere, I'm sure. :)
Oh, nice, that'd be great, T.D! I personally don't have the sequel yet, but if you guys vote for it, we could try and fit the sequel in somewhere, I'm sure. :)
Btw, Ruth sent me a message saying that she'll be on a trip during February, but that she was going to do her best to get hold of an e-copy. She said we shouldn't wait for her, but I'm sure if we had to wait a day or two, it won't be the end of the world. In any case, she's aiming to join us on the 10th, so let's see how it pans out. :)

Oh, I didn't mean we have to plan for both of them. Just mentioning that I have the set (they looked so good together that I bought both!) but I am happy to just read the first one with the group and see how we go.

http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/valen...
I love Clarkesworld. They introduced me to Valente and Ken Liu


Btw, those of you who have the actual paper book, is your book also bound with those rough edges, (a sort of deckle edge) and if so, what do you think of this kind of binding?


Software patents should be abolished based on this premise alone, don't you think?
Puddin Pointy-Toes wrote: "In a world of six-plus billion people, my dear, you can be assured you're never the only one to have any thought or hold any opinion. This can be both comforting and discouraging, I suppose.
"
The big thing is to find them, Puddin. Thank the gods of science for the internet...
"
The big thing is to find them, Puddin. Thank the gods of science for the internet...
Um.. so is nobody reading with us? Did I mention that the first spoiler thread is here? https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
It is for pages 1 to 83, Book of the Steppe to Other Prince's Tale.
It is for pages 1 to 83, Book of the Steppe to Other Prince's Tale.

That's fine, Derek, we've all been taking it slow for various reasons. Warning, the first few pages are flowery and even somewhat stilted, but it relaxes after that if you just hang in there long enough.
See you soon on the other thread, where we've been discussing the above-mentioned. :)
PS, most people clocked in before page 83, so... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
See you soon on the other thread, where we've been discussing the above-mentioned. :)
PS, most people clocked in before page 83, so... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I so wanted to be swept away by this book, and the cover indeed holds so much promise. But I kept stumbling at the entrance, and my progress is not swift.
Travellers warning in the comment above was not wasted on me...I found the florid metaphors a bit much and the pace is relentless, but I am hanging in, if beginning to wonder when we get to relax....
Wow, that happens to me so often, i hate losing posts on GR! Glad you've got the book and hanging in with it! I'm going to try and give it a bunch of love myself tomorrow, after finishing other commitments. :)

Thanks for this post, Magdelanye. Good to know I'm not alone in feeling like this. I want to like it, but I get bored within a page or two, so my progress too is slow.
Darn, I wish she had better editors who told her to take out the superfluous purpleness.
This is all pretty sad, since I had really enjoyed Deathless.
This book can't be that bad though, since looking at my friends' shelves, I just see 5 star ratings!
This is all pretty sad, since I had really enjoyed Deathless.
This book can't be that bad though, since looking at my friends' shelves, I just see 5 star ratings!


And I am needing to go back less often to pick up a thread....tho where is the bit about the girl in the tent giving birth?
I think one of the things that catches one a bit at first is the many storylines. But as you go along, they start to take shape in your mind a bit better.
Maybe Valente shouldn't have started with so many of them at once. You know, introduced each different one a bit more gradually, if possible.
Maybe Valente shouldn't have started with so many of them at once. You know, introduced each different one a bit more gradually, if possible.
There's not many spoilers in the next thread yet, if you wanted to move on to there. I'll re-post the link for your convenience. (Actually there are no spoilers, so it's quite safe! ;)
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
...but take your time. :)
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
...but take your time. :)

Magdelanye wrote: "in fact I think its good the way she's done it....the feeling of overwhelm is the hook...its like she throws an enormous soft blanket over the reader who must work a bit to get comfortable in it."
Well, that's a very helpful and positive way of looking at it, Magdelanye! Thank you for that. :)
Well, that's a very helpful and positive way of looking at it, Magdelanye! Thank you for that. :)

No, of course there isn't a barb in that comment, Magdelanye! Goodness, why would there be?
The fact that the link doesn't work, must have to do with your mobile, because it works for me.
I deleted the duplicate comment for you.
There is another thread yes, and I'd very much like for you to find it. Maybe you can click on it from here? https://www.goodreads.com/topic/group...
(It's called spoiler thread 1)
The fact that the link doesn't work, must have to do with your mobile, because it works for me.
I deleted the duplicate comment for you.
There is another thread yes, and I'd very much like for you to find it. Maybe you can click on it from here? https://www.goodreads.com/topic/group...
(It's called spoiler thread 1)
..and please don't worry - most of us including myself are aware of the pitfalls of struggling with mobile typing and the horrible GR interface you get on mobile devices.
Magdelanye wrote: "is there a barb there in that comment? I am sorry for duplication and many typos. I am struggling with my new fone who presumes to change things to fit its own programming. can you delete the dupli..."
Sadly i do seem to have problems with expressing my tone sufficiently, and it has happened before that people interpret what i meant as a positive comment, as a negative one. I'm not quite sure how to remedy that.
In any case, I honestly thought that what you said there is a nice way of approaching the difficulty and structure of this text. I'm not sure how else to express my appreciation... I mean, I ... well, I even posted a smiley at the end?
Would it help if i added that i too, much prefer a complex text that one has to work with a bit, rather than something where one is spoonfed with every sentence? An example of the latter would be 50 Shades of Grey, for example. I am definitely not a fan of that kind of "literature". Examples of a more complex, layered text, the kind which i appreciate more, would be works by China Mieville, Jeff Vandermeer and Gene Wolfe, for example.
...and now Catherynne Valente too. :)_
Sadly i do seem to have problems with expressing my tone sufficiently, and it has happened before that people interpret what i meant as a positive comment, as a negative one. I'm not quite sure how to remedy that.
In any case, I honestly thought that what you said there is a nice way of approaching the difficulty and structure of this text. I'm not sure how else to express my appreciation... I mean, I ... well, I even posted a smiley at the end?
Would it help if i added that i too, much prefer a complex text that one has to work with a bit, rather than something where one is spoonfed with every sentence? An example of the latter would be 50 Shades of Grey, for example. I am definitely not a fan of that kind of "literature". Examples of a more complex, layered text, the kind which i appreciate more, would be works by China Mieville, Jeff Vandermeer and Gene Wolfe, for example.
...and now Catherynne Valente too. :)_
That's strange... If you go to the "group home" do you not see 2 links there under IN THE NIGHT GARDEN - Valente? Wait, I'll make the other thread be on top.



Oh dear. Perhaps we shouldn't have picked this one as our first read... though i suppose 1984 was actually our first for the year, eh?

Oh, good, it's nice to know I'm not alone in feeling this way. I just can't make myself go back to it.
Sorry, Traveller....

I had to stop reading it because someone put a hold on it, and I had to return it the library a few days ago :(. I'm a slow reader these days anyway, so I didn't get as far as I'd like. But it's definitely still on my list of books I'd like to read!
I definitely think we should still read and discuss. But maybe on a longer term than we had intended. I'll still make the threads, and then people can come and comment if and when it suits them. :)
Books mentioned in this topic
Deathless (other topics)The Three-Body Problem (other topics)
The Paper Menagerie and Other Stories (other topics)
Cloud Atlas (other topics)
This book promises to be, as we had seen in a previous Valente discussion on Mièvillians, fantasy for adults.
I thought it might be easy for us to ease our way into the new group with some short stories, just until we have found our feet. Since I've wanted to read this for a long, long time, I therefore thought it would be a good opportunity to finally make my acquaintance with it, but after a bit of research, I discovered that apparently one must not be fooled into thinking that it is a collection of loose stories, but rather that it is a series of interconnected stories almost like a novel, but not one with a straightforward plot line. (Structured a bit like Mitchell's Cloud Atlas, I wonder? ) Or, possibly even more interwoven than Cloud Atlas, because apparently there are recurring characters.
On Strange Horizons, reviewer Dan Hartland says:
Valente's book is really something quite different—not just a collection of stories, but an examination of, and an experiment in, the telling of them. It is frequently beautiful in language and tone, constantly inventive in character and situation, and charmingly mischievous in thought and deed.
In the Night Garden is something close to two novels sharing a single metanarrative.[...] What gets to the heart of Valente's endeavour, however, is that they are connected narratively—not at first, and not directly, but characters and plots move in and out of both sets of stories in a way which does not feel contrived or obvious.
It won the 2008 Mythopoeic Award for Adult Literature, and was nominated for both the 2006 James Tiptree, Jr. Award and the 2007 World Fantasy Award.
Is anyone interested in starting on this some time in February?