SFF Hot from Printers: New Releases discussion
General
>
Is SFF a correct combination?
date
newest »


Bishop wrote: "I think the main reason we see these genres paired is that they both operate under the general umbrella of "speculative fiction." ."
Maybe you're correct. However some genres like Latin American magic realism are also clearly speculative fiction, but less often assumed a part of SFF. And elements in SF are often fully different from fantasy, chiefly what can be (SF) and what cannot be (magic, fantasy).
Maybe you're correct. However some genres like Latin American magic realism are also clearly speculative fiction, but less often assumed a part of SFF. And elements in SF are often fully different from fantasy, chiefly what can be (SF) and what cannot be (magic, fantasy).

Was basically going to say exactly this. I think within both scifi and fantasy you can either go the route of escapism or speculative inquiry. You know? Writing a story in world different from reality can be just pure escapist fun whether it's with dragons or spaceships, but you can also use both types of settings to really challenge or speculate too. That's why I tend to go more literal with my definitions. Is it science/tech setting? Scfi. Is it magic? Fantasy. Magical realism does muddy the waters for sure. I think a lot of genres can at times borrow magical realism mechanics, but it can also be its own genre. idk.
Is magical realism really "speculative", though? It doesn't really ask "what-if" questions: weird, magical things simply happen and are accepted as normal. MR doesn't explore how the magic affects the world, nor does it build a consistent world with understandable rules.
"New Weird" is closer in tone to MR than fantasy, IMO.
"New Weird" is closer in tone to MR than fantasy, IMO.
Kristen wrote: "I think within both scifi and fantasy you can either go the route of escapism or speculative inquiry"
While true, the problem is that say mystery or horror are also escapism, I guess the majority of fiction is. And say mysteries often have highly unlikely (fantastic?) settings, but we don't usually add them to SFF
While true, the problem is that say mystery or horror are also escapism, I guess the majority of fiction is. And say mysteries often have highly unlikely (fantastic?) settings, but we don't usually add them to SFF

And what do you do with books like Polaris Rising? Touted as SF, it's just a romance with spaceships. It was OK. Characterization not very good. Also, kinda slow.
Then there's the Alternative History stuff. They are, of course, speculative because, duh, Alternative, but still . . . . Many of them are just some other form entirely. There's one we read here that I ended up not finishing, about Jews settling in Alaska after WWII? I DNFed it because 1) TMB,TLT and 2) as far as I read, it was just a mystery, and I have read many better mysteries.
Then there's the Alternative History stuff. They are, of course, speculative because, duh, Alternative, but still . . . . Many of them are just some other form entirely. There's one we read here that I ended up not finishing, about Jews settling in Alaska after WWII? I DNFed it because 1) TMB,TLT and 2) as far as I read, it was just a mystery, and I have read many better mysteries.
I wander, maybe SFF merger "just happened", maybe because there were quite a few author that wrote both - Heinlein, Zelazny, Le Guin, S.C. Lewis in the 40s-50s. At the same time early fantasy predates them, from the mid to late 30s, often in pulp magazines. Maybe the later joined these two genres in our mind.
It was different in the USSR, where fantasy hasn't been recognized as a specific genre up to the late 80s, so only SF was present
It was different in the USSR, where fantasy hasn't been recognized as a specific genre up to the late 80s, so only SF was present
In the early days of the pulp, the line between fantasy and SF is much blurrier than later: take Edgar Rice Burroughs' Barsoom stuff, for instance. They take place on Mars and have aliens - but the hero didn't arrive there by spaceship, but via... I don't even know, some sort of magic, I guess? And at least the first story is pretty fantasy-like,with princess in distress and everything.
So I would speculate that in the beginning there were simply "fantastical" stories and the division into fantasy and SF came later.
So I would speculate that in the beginning there were simply "fantastical" stories and the division into fantasy and SF came later.

While true, the problem is that say mystery or horror are also escapism, I gue..."
Right, that's why I go more literal and just judge by the setting.
Antti wrote: So I would speculate that in the beginning there were simply "fantastical" stories and the division into fantasy and SF came later.
That sounds right to me.
Antti wrote: "So I would speculate that in the beginning there were simply "fantastical" stories and the division into fantasy and SF came later.."
Maybe I'm splitting the hairs, but I'd say at the beginning (Frankenstein: The 1818 Text, From the Earth to the Moon and up to H.G. Wells) we had 'pure' SF, which gets mixed with adventures (A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court, A Princess of Mars) and a bit later 'true' fantasy appears (The Fellowship of the Ring, Conan the Barbarian, The Chronicles of Narnia and Swords and Ice Magic) in the 30s. So, not exactly the beginning but definitely during popularity of pulp
Maybe I'm splitting the hairs, but I'd say at the beginning (Frankenstein: The 1818 Text, From the Earth to the Moon and up to H.G. Wells) we had 'pure' SF, which gets mixed with adventures (A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court, A Princess of Mars) and a bit later 'true' fantasy appears (The Fellowship of the Ring, Conan the Barbarian, The Chronicles of Narnia and Swords and Ice Magic) in the 30s. So, not exactly the beginning but definitely during popularity of pulp
There was a movement that didn't prevail to call them all speculative fiction. I've read about it at some point, and it is why we have the term today.
As I was writing this, I did a search for "origins of the term 'speculative fiction'" and according to this first link RAH coined the term.
https://www.masterclass.com/articles/...
And here's the Wikipedia link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specula...
As I was writing this, I did a search for "origins of the term 'speculative fiction'" and according to this first link RAH coined the term.
https://www.masterclass.com/articles/...
And here's the Wikipedia link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specula...
Books mentioned in this topic
Frankenstein: The 1818 Text (other topics)From the Earth to the Moon (other topics)
A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court (other topics)
A Princess of Mars (other topics)
The Fellowship of the Ring (other topics)
More...
So, why we see SFF as a 'natural' combination?