Dickensians! discussion
David Copperfield - Group Read 1
>
May - June 2020: David Copperfield: chapters 1-14
Great! That's the beauty of loving Classics; many of them are in the public domain, whichever country you live in. It means that you can often get them straight away as an ebook - and free!
I often buy a cheap copy on kindle though, just to see the original illustrations, as Project Gutenberg doesn't usually include them.
I often buy a cheap copy on kindle though, just to see the original illustrations, as Project Gutenberg doesn't usually include them.

That's really good news, Petra and Rosemarie! Please don't worry about timings, as this is an informal, relaxed group. Just join in when it is right for you :)

This is shaping up nicely, to say we have almost 3 weeks to go before it starts :)
I do hope you are able to join in Candi, and am really looking forward to reading this with everyone. It is such a treat of a book!
I do hope you are able to join in Candi, and am really looking forward to reading this with everyone. It is such a treat of a book!

I do not think I would be good at waiting a year and a half to get to the end of the story. My goodness they were patient back then!


Sara wrote: "I am a big believer in you cannot read Dickens too many times...always something new to find ..."
I feel exactly like this too! I'm not sure how patient his fans were though ... there were newspaper reports of him being mobbed by fans in America, and generally pestered by readers who wanted to know what happened next.
There's one story, possibly apocryphal, which says that he overheard someone in London, telling her friend that she had read what would happen in the next episode of his most recent work, only for him to turn round and say "Madam, I haven't written it yet!"
I do think that things went more slowly in those days, but perhaps a year and a half was pushing it!
I feel exactly like this too! I'm not sure how patient his fans were though ... there were newspaper reports of him being mobbed by fans in America, and generally pestered by readers who wanted to know what happened next.
There's one story, possibly apocryphal, which says that he overheard someone in London, telling her friend that she had read what would happen in the next episode of his most recent work, only for him to turn round and say "Madam, I haven't written it yet!"
I do think that things went more slowly in those days, but perhaps a year and a half was pushing it!


Cindy wrote: "So we just read at our own pace and post questions or comments about Part I here and Part II on the other thread at any time during the process? I just want to make sure I'm not missing a reading s..."
Yes please. I'm keen to make this group inclusive, and don't want to impose a rigid timetable. So far I've just split it into two threads, and will unlock the next one after a little while, but not right at the start. I'm relying on everyone to use spoiler tags when appropriate, rather than have a lot of threads.
There won't be a schedule, but will be a side read for those who like to read quickly. This is our first read, though, and so far it's not known what the level or depth of discussion will be.
The top thread in this folder explains the broad concept LINK HERE
Yes please. I'm keen to make this group inclusive, and don't want to impose a rigid timetable. So far I've just split it into two threads, and will unlock the next one after a little while, but not right at the start. I'm relying on everyone to use spoiler tags when appropriate, rather than have a lot of threads.
There won't be a schedule, but will be a side read for those who like to read quickly. This is our first read, though, and so far it's not known what the level or depth of discussion will be.
The top thread in this folder explains the broad concept LINK HERE

As for the serial publication - I don't know how people remained patient after only receiving a small part every few weeks. On the other hand, it adds a lot to the reading process as you had to stay focussed on the story to read it over such a period.
That's great Kathrin! Because many of us are finding it difficult to get books during the lockdown, perhaps it might be worth you considering reading it on a kindle, or ereader - or even online. One of the benefits of starting such a group as this one at the moment, is that everything is available in that way, and free too!
Yes, indeed, the Victorian serials were a completely different way of reading, from nowadays, when we can just stroll into a bookshop and have hundreds of books at our disposal! I also admire how Charles Dickens managed to keep the characters and plot uppermost in people's minds, with a gap of a few weeks every time! He has more characters in his fiction - little cameos and the like - than any other classic author I know. And his readers were ordinary people - largely uneducated - and often had to pay someone a penny or so to read the chapters to them.
Skill on both sides there, I think :)
Yes, indeed, the Victorian serials were a completely different way of reading, from nowadays, when we can just stroll into a bookshop and have hundreds of books at our disposal! I also admire how Charles Dickens managed to keep the characters and plot uppermost in people's minds, with a gap of a few weeks every time! He has more characters in his fiction - little cameos and the like - than any other classic author I know. And his readers were ordinary people - largely uneducated - and often had to pay someone a penny or so to read the chapters to them.
Skill on both sides there, I think :)

I am kind of ashamed to admit that I already got a Kindle copy in 2013, but on the other hand, this means I am definitely joining the group read :)

I am a big fan of audiobooks and there are some excellent recordings of Dickens. There are still people who insist audiobooks aren't "real" books, but studies have shown they engage the brain in the same way. One person even went so far as to specifically say that it was wrong to read a classic like Dickens on audio. Well, as Bionic Jean mentioned, that's exactly how many people first experienced Dickens.
All of Dickens is available free or cheaply on tablets or e-readers. Some even have the illustrations.
I have read David Copperfield at least 3 times, so I don't think I'll reread but will chime in.
Robin wrote: "I have read David Copperfield at least 3 times, so I don't think I'll reread but will chime in ..."
That's absolutely fine Robin, although I willnot so secretly hope that you will be so tempted, that you find yourself opening the book up, and having a little read now and then :)
"The good thing about doing it that way for Dickens was that, just like a TV show, he could beef up a character's role if the public enjoyed it."
Yes! Audience response was akin to today's soaps. Charles Dickens tended to drop a character if his audience didn't like them, or introduce a new one if sales were flagging. For his early novels, he hadn't a clue where his plot would go! And more than once he had to rewrite a character, if the person he based it on recognised themselves. One, a dwarf manicurist, threatened to take him to court, as she didn't like the way he had portrayed her.
I always think of his stories as Victorian soaps, (at least in this way, although far superior of course :) )
That's absolutely fine Robin, although I will
"The good thing about doing it that way for Dickens was that, just like a TV show, he could beef up a character's role if the public enjoyed it."
Yes! Audience response was akin to today's soaps. Charles Dickens tended to drop a character if his audience didn't like them, or introduce a new one if sales were flagging. For his early novels, he hadn't a clue where his plot would go! And more than once he had to rewrite a character, if the person he based it on recognised themselves. One, a dwarf manicurist, threatened to take him to court, as she didn't like the way he had portrayed her.
I always think of his stories as Victorian soaps, (at least in this way, although far superior of course :) )

Luckily my Mum is a Dickens fan and had a set of most of his works so it was just a case of going to the shelf and finding it. I still have her books now.
YAY Susan - it's so great to see you here, and joining in with this :)
And what a fabulous story for the reason behind reading this at age 12! I'll put another in the next post.
And what a fabulous story for the reason behind reading this at age 12! I'll put another in the next post.
Captain Scott’s men read parts of David Copperfield aloud every night while they were trapped in an ice cave in the Antarctic, on their doomed expedition. It was one of three books that they used to entertain themselves, while they were stranded there for seven months. They read one chapter a night aloud, for 60 nights, to keep up morale. The geologist who was part of the group, said “we were very sorry to part with David”, when the story came to an end.

This is a photo of the actual copy, from 1910. It's stained with black fingerprints from the seal blubber lamps that were used to light the ice cave, and apparently still bears a faint whiff of smoke and fish.
Isn't this amazing? :)

This is a photo of the actual copy, from 1910. It's stained with black fingerprints from the seal blubber lamps that were used to light the ice cave, and apparently still bears a faint whiff of smoke and fish.
Isn't this amazing? :)

Mind you, it's 36 hours long!!
Does anyone remember him from the TV adaptation of North and South?

What a fascinating story. I hope their books were all long ones to fill in their lonely hours. I guess that light to read by was very precious though.
Susan - since Captain Scott's team only had 3 books, and I think there were 6 in the expedition, my guess is that they were all read aloud. But I'd love to know which the others were!
Sue - I do indeed remember Richard Armitage from the dramatisation of North and South - and being so surprised when he was cast as Thorin Oakenshield in "The Lord of the Rings" films. I agree about the timbre of his voice; his accent is like mine but more so, and his voice is deeper, richer and more sonorous :) It's an odd choice to read David Copperfield though, which is set much further south ...
On the other hand he's an actor isn't he, so can obviously adapt! (Duh!) You must tell us what it's like, as I think this is a great book for reading aloud, or dramatising :)
On the other hand he's an actor isn't he, so can obviously adapt! (Duh!) You must tell us what it's like, as I think this is a great book for reading aloud, or dramatising :)

I'm now going to read the same chapters on kindle, because I am already really confused! What was that bit at the beginning about a call being sold?
In my defence I was distracted by having to keep crossing the road to remain the appropriate distance from the other dog walkers!
LOL Sue. But I'm afraid I'm sticking to the start date for our group reads. Of course it's up to you when you start reading David Copperfield, but comments on the text won't start here until 1st May.
So a word about how these threads work. This group is for everyone, and we all have different ways of approaching a book. So a rigid timetable within the set period is not really appropriate.
1. If anyone is looking at this book, and wondering how to pace such a lengthy classic novel, then it is possible to just read 1 chapter a day, and finish at the close of the group read, as evidenced by Captain Scott! This is quite a good approach if you are new to Charles Dickens, or if Victorian literature is unfamiliar to you, as you can read something else alongside.
2. If you prefer to read 2 or 3 chapters at once, then maybe read a portion every 2 or three days, to keep the same pace.
3. But if you always read for the story, (with no analysis) and devour far more than this each day, then that's fine too, and you can just comment in retrospect :) There will be a side read opened up in the second half of May, with this approach in mind.
I personally will try to steer the middle, and add interesting side notes as we go, sometimes under spoiler tags. Please make sure you use these as necessary too! Thanks.
So a word about how these threads work. This group is for everyone, and we all have different ways of approaching a book. So a rigid timetable within the set period is not really appropriate.
1. If anyone is looking at this book, and wondering how to pace such a lengthy classic novel, then it is possible to just read 1 chapter a day, and finish at the close of the group read, as evidenced by Captain Scott! This is quite a good approach if you are new to Charles Dickens, or if Victorian literature is unfamiliar to you, as you can read something else alongside.
2. If you prefer to read 2 or 3 chapters at once, then maybe read a portion every 2 or three days, to keep the same pace.
3. But if you always read for the story, (with no analysis) and devour far more than this each day, then that's fine too, and you can just comment in retrospect :) There will be a side read opened up in the second half of May, with this approach in mind.
I personally will try to steer the middle, and add interesting side notes as we go, sometimes under spoiler tags. Please make sure you use these as necessary too! Thanks.


Wow, thanks for sharing that, Jean! I love early polar exploration, but didn't know this! Not sure If I will be joining in this group read or not, it really depends on if the library opens again soon. But I have read it once before so I will at least follow along with your discussions. :)
Do you use an ereader, Meg? Just a thought ...
Otherwise it will be great if you pop in with your comments from memory - and anyone else who find it difficult to get the book at this time.
Otherwise it will be great if you pop in with your comments from memory - and anyone else who find it difficult to get the book at this time.

I'm ..."
The call was a”caul”. It is something about the membrane surrounding the baby and there were superstitions about it. That is one downside of audio, you can’t tell how things are spelled. I will look for info on it.
Yes, thanks, but please can we hold back on further comments from the text until 1st.
I'm hoping to be able to leave this thread open, not locked, so people can announce themselves as they join in, and also so we can share any suitable information we like about the novel, prior to reading it.
Thanks.
I'm hoping to be able to leave this thread open, not locked, so people can announce themselves as they join in, and also so we can share any suitable information we like about the novel, prior to reading it.
Thanks.

Otherwise it will be great if you pop in with your comments from memory - and anyone else who find it difficult to get the book at this time."
No the only way I have to read online is on the computer, which I can do but it takes me a forever to finish a long book that way! ;)
Meg wrote: "No the only way I have to read online is on the computer, which I can do but it takes me a forever to finish a long book that way! ;)..."
Oh yes, I can only read short stories like that really, or remind myself of something.
Oh yes, I can only read short stories like that really, or remind myself of something.
I'm wondering - are others itching to get started too? I'm aware that this is a unique occasion, since we have no previous group read.
If there's demand, then we could start this bit early - say a week from now? That splits the difference, and anyone just joining the group will still be able to catch up.
Would anyone like to do this?
If there's demand, then we could start this bit early - say a week from now? That splits the difference, and anyone just joining the group will still be able to catch up.
Would anyone like to do this?

If there's demand, then we could start this bit early - say a..."
I'm easy Jean, although I probably won't start till May anyway.

I am looking forward to starting, though. It's been ages since I've read a book by Dickens.


Books mentioned in this topic
The Black City (other topics)The Vampyre (other topics)
Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell (other topics)
The Artful Dickens: The Tricks and Ploys of the Great Novelist (other topics)
Jane Eyre (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Jane Austen (other topics)George Sand (other topics)
John Mullan (other topics)
Charles Dickens (other topics)
Charles Dickens (other topics)
More...
Our first ever group read is of David Copperfield. This is a moderator's selection, to begin with, although next time the choice will be decided by a group poll.
Please note - Comments on the text itself, begin with comment 95. Here are links to all the chapters in this thread, kindly provided by Nisa :) (Thank you Nisa!) If you click on each underlined chapter number, it will take you directly to the summary post for that chapter.
I – May 1849 (chapters 1–3);
Chapter 1 (Message 95)
Chapter 2 (Message 129)
Chapter 3 (Message 149)
II – June 1849 (chapters 4–6);
Chapter 4 (Message 176)
Chapter 5 (Message 212)
Chapter 6 (Message 245)
III – July 1849 (chapters 7–9);
Chapter 7 (Message 275)
Chapter 8 (Message 289)
Chapter 9 (Message 313)
IV – August 1849 (chapters 10–12);
Chapter 10 (Message 351)
Chapter 11 (Message 377)
Chapter 12 (Message 399)
V – September 1849 (chapters 13–15);
Chapter 13 (Message 421)
Chapter 14 (Message 439)
David Copperfield was Charles Dickens's own favourite book :) Of it he wrote, "like many fond parents, I have in my heart of hearts a favourite child. And his name is David Copperfield." It was his 8th novel, so just over halfway through his oeuvre. It is often termed an "autobiographical novel", as so many incidents are drawn from his own life.
David Copperfield is actually Charles Dickens's longest novel, by word count! And yet it is a good one to start with, as it is so accessible, has many wonderful characters, and makes you both laugh and cry. It is the sort of novel which can be read over and over again, finding something new every time.
Here is the cover from the first part of the serial in May 1849:
David Copperfield was first issued in monthly parts. Dickensians living then, had to wait until November 1850 - over a year and a half - to read the conclusion of the story! In the 21st century, this is difficult to imagine.
Please feel free to begin this novel as soon as you join the group, even if it is a little ahead of time. And please remember the courtesy rule, and avoid or hide any major plot reveals. Since this is a kind of "bildungsroman" or coming of age story, there shouldn't be too many mysterious secrets which are essential to hide!
So without more ado, who's joining in with us here?