Baker Street Irregulars discussion
General
>
Worst or most disappointing story in the canon.
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Barbara
(new)
Feb 25, 2020 09:27AM

reply
|
flag


Of course, the other downside of Mazarin Stone is that’s it’s one of 2 Doyle Holmes stories written in the third person, and I’d say on that note His Last Bow is my second least favorite. That one also serves mainly as just a coda for the stories, and not much remarkable happens in it.


I was just about to say that Doyle is never consistent, even in his prejudices--I think "The Yellow Face" is astoundingly progressive, and "The Five Orange Pips" really needs to be complimented, given that in that era, the Klan was romanticized in many stories (heartbreakingly leading to its resurgence). But he was also lazy about using "The Other" as a stock villain.
For me, "The Sussex Vampire" and "The Creeping Man" disappoint because Doyle lets his belief in the supernatural impact the rationalistic world he so carefully created in previous books. "The Lion's Mane" and the other Holmes-authored stories prove that Watson was a damn fine writer, compared with Holmes, and Holmes really did struggle to appreciate fine literature, right?
"The Three Garridebs" disappoints because why not use a better story for such a touching moment?


True, I guess my disappointment in "The Creeping Man" and "The Sussex Vampire" is more in the writing style than straight-on use of the supernatural. I mean, "The Devil's Foot" is one of my favorite short stories of all time. But for some reason, I find it just more plausible that a natural root might cause the hallucinations that provoke the behavior seen in "The Creeping Man," so it doesn't bother me. The sucking out the poison also strains credibility, but Doyle certainly was able to pull off even weirder stuff at the top of his game (like milk-drinking snakes).

On a personal note, I've written - so far - three stories for the anthologies released by MX Publishing, and the most recent one (the volume isn't out yet) brings in characters from "The Three Gables," and - I hope - rehabilitates the Holmes/Dixie relationship.
Agree that that story comes off as racist, but one reason that is rarely discussed is the fact that it was published in the late 1920s, when detective fiction began to be dominated by more hard boiled, noir-ish characters and language. I think Conan Doyle may have been trying - unsuccessfully - to keep up with the times.

I also like The Devil's Foot a lot. It's kind of a locked room mystery which is always interesting. It's also one of those cases where Holmes lets the culprit go, he's kid of judge and jury. And I think Sterndale is a good character.
@J. Looking forward to reading your retake of the Three Gables.

I know its for charity but I wish these books were more affordable.