Weird Westerns discussion

This topic is about
The Horror From The Mound, And Black Talons
Group Reads
>
Dec 2014 Group Read Discussion
date
newest »


I like how close "adventure" and "horror" can run together. Which would be why I'm writing the book I am haha. I need to get the Solomon Kane collection and I'll pretty much have all of Howard's work.
Also, I think, considering how busy December is, we'll just go ahead and go for a single read this go round and discuss it. Come January, we can do Helldorado, since it got second place. Unless everyone wants to try and read it too.
Also, I think, considering how busy December is, we'll just go ahead and go for a single read this go round and discuss it. Come January, we can do Helldorado, since it got second place. Unless everyone wants to try and read it too.

Spoilers Below
-------------------
(view spoiler)
For anyone curious, the spoiler tag can be referenced by clicking the "some html is ok" link. Try to use that since it hides the content.

There is definitely a lot of horror stuff in Weird Westerns. I will say, as far as this story goes, it's very pulp since it's from one of the kings of pulp fiction. You might find it rather tame compared to other things you've seen. If you get around to reading it, definitely sound off.


(view spoiler) ["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>

Spoilers Below
-------------------"
(view spoiler)


(view spoiler)

Didn't mean to say you were, was just voicing what popped up in my head. That story, so far, is the only one I've really liked in the anthology.

As far as Dracula and Horror From the Mound, the interesting thing to me is that it's pretty clearly a choice to be different. The man could do Gothic if he wanted to. I think Black Canaan and Pigeons From Hell could be considered Gothic. So I don't think he 'messed up' the tradition, for Howard it seems natural to throw a 'Gothic' vampire into West Texas.
The thing I like most about Gothic is that it fits anywhere. If you know how to use it, you can make a little desert town gothic. I've done that before, a few years ago, for a workshop on deviantart. So, someone like Howard, of course he could do it.
As for "messing up traditions," I mean, Dracula pretty much codified vampires for modern audiences and then Nosferatu added "death by sunlight" as a further weakness (though, for my money, I ignore that in favor of "weakened during the day," sans Drac's noontime power hour). There's so many variations on the mythology throughout cultures that, really, the only way to mess it up was the sparkling from Twilight. And I'm not even saying that to make fun of Twilight, I don't like it but the jokes are a dead horse that's 12 feet under at this point. Mostly, I just feel like if you're gonna have a diamond-skinned, sparkly monster, you need to give it a better masquerade ability than "lives in perpetual overcast."
As for "messing up traditions," I mean, Dracula pretty much codified vampires for modern audiences and then Nosferatu added "death by sunlight" as a further weakness (though, for my money, I ignore that in favor of "weakened during the day," sans Drac's noontime power hour). There's so many variations on the mythology throughout cultures that, really, the only way to mess it up was the sparkling from Twilight. And I'm not even saying that to make fun of Twilight, I don't like it but the jokes are a dead horse that's 12 feet under at this point. Mostly, I just feel like if you're gonna have a diamond-skinned, sparkly monster, you need to give it a better masquerade ability than "lives in perpetual overcast."
Not a big turn out for the first group read but we had some good discussion. I hope everyone enjoyed themselves. We'll set up another group read in the future.
Well I'm very late to the group read but I do have some thoughts on it.
Spoilers below
--------------
Let me start by saying I am a big fan of Howard's writing but aside from his big collections of his most well known characters (Conan, Solomon Kane and others) I've never had the chance to delve into his individual works or writings in other genres. So I was glad we picked this.
It is not quite what I expected but I found it an enjoyable read nonetheless. I was hoping for a little more Spaghetti Western style gunfighting and the like, but what we got was a rural Texas creepy yarn, something Howard no doubt was at home with.
I was ok with the monster reveal being a vampire. As others have pointed out vampire fiction was popular at the time period (the earliest works being Varney the Vampire from England well before Dracula appeared) and it is not the first time Howard has dealt with vampires in his fiction (see Solomon Kane; a few of the stories involve a Puritan warrior fighting vampires in darkest Africa in the 1600s!), nor is it the first time his hero fought evil in a rolling, tussling, punch-em-up style only to be victorious (again, Kane). But do I think he could have come up with a better critter as the reveal? Yep. As a contemporary and working friend of H.P. Lovecraft, even going so far as to contribute a bit to the Cthulhu Mythos, he could have come up with something more terrifying or surreal than a by comparison bog standard vampire. But then again as a working writer during the Depression, he had to go with what was popular to get published.
I did appreciate his attempts at historical accuracy to lend verisimilitude (the conquest of southwestern North America by the Spanish in the 1500s/1600s) to the fiction; it was a neat touch and a good lesson for budding fiction writers. But again vampires at a time when no real life person would have known what they were (demons and witches they would have believed in, but stories of the walking dead would have been received with nothing but skepticism).
To finish, it's not Howard at his best. It seems like a throwaway work; for all we know it was, and Howard knowingly wrote it just to get a steady paycheck or at the behest of his publication editors. But it's fun, it's short and it is at least passionate and true to form for the man and his writing style. I'm glad we took a look at it.
Spoilers below
--------------
Let me start by saying I am a big fan of Howard's writing but aside from his big collections of his most well known characters (Conan, Solomon Kane and others) I've never had the chance to delve into his individual works or writings in other genres. So I was glad we picked this.
It is not quite what I expected but I found it an enjoyable read nonetheless. I was hoping for a little more Spaghetti Western style gunfighting and the like, but what we got was a rural Texas creepy yarn, something Howard no doubt was at home with.
I was ok with the monster reveal being a vampire. As others have pointed out vampire fiction was popular at the time period (the earliest works being Varney the Vampire from England well before Dracula appeared) and it is not the first time Howard has dealt with vampires in his fiction (see Solomon Kane; a few of the stories involve a Puritan warrior fighting vampires in darkest Africa in the 1600s!), nor is it the first time his hero fought evil in a rolling, tussling, punch-em-up style only to be victorious (again, Kane). But do I think he could have come up with a better critter as the reveal? Yep. As a contemporary and working friend of H.P. Lovecraft, even going so far as to contribute a bit to the Cthulhu Mythos, he could have come up with something more terrifying or surreal than a by comparison bog standard vampire. But then again as a working writer during the Depression, he had to go with what was popular to get published.
I did appreciate his attempts at historical accuracy to lend verisimilitude (the conquest of southwestern North America by the Spanish in the 1500s/1600s) to the fiction; it was a neat touch and a good lesson for budding fiction writers. But again vampires at a time when no real life person would have known what they were (demons and witches they would have believed in, but stories of the walking dead would have been received with nothing but skepticism).
To finish, it's not Howard at his best. It seems like a throwaway work; for all we know it was, and Howard knowingly wrote it just to get a steady paycheck or at the behest of his publication editors. But it's fun, it's short and it is at least passionate and true to form for the man and his writing style. I'm glad we took a look at it.
All good points. I'd have to look at the publishing history of the story to know if it was a throwaway/paycheck story but yeah, even if it was, it let him keep writing and giving us other great work.

Yeah, so seing at it was an issue with the book and not wanting to putter I deleted the book from my Kindle. So much for that! I will definitely try to read the next group read whatever it will be on time and hopefully it won't gimme any issues.
Remember to use the spoilers tag to discuss the story until everyone has had a chance to read it.
Happy reading!