Reading 1001 discussion

This topic is about
The Drowned and the Saved
1001 book reviews
>
The Drowned and the Saved by Primo Levi
date
newest »


I read this in 2010....This is not a novel but more of an essay The Drowned and the Saved is an attempt at an analytical approach. The problem of the fallibility of memory, the techniques used by the Nazis to break the will of prisoners, the use of language in the camps and the nature of violence are all studied. It is written by Pimo Levi, an Italian Jew who was in Auschwitz. It is well written. My Levi is an agnostic. He makes reference and quotes many works of literature such as Thomas Mann's Magic Mountain and Mazoni's The Betrothed and especially Dante.

I really liked the book. I will just repeat that I was amazed how Levi describes people. I think that those features of people he was pointing at are universal, but just become extremes in extreme conditions such is the camp. This argumentation of how people will behave among oppressors was so convincing. Also, how after everything was over people will try to defend themselves in terms of guilt. How people will twist their memories and convince others in something they would like to believe. It is the best part of the book, according to my opinion. This is why I particularly liked the first few chapters of the book.

The Drowned and the Saved is a collection of essays by Primo Levi where he analyzes the experience of himself and others in Nazi concentration camps. Levi approaches the topic from several different angles..psychologically, scientifically, philosophically. A lot of the focus is on the fallibility of memory and how people want to make things black & white...good guys vs. bad guys. He also discusses techniques that the nazis used to dehumanize the prisoners in order to both control them and to decrease their guilt over their treatment of their fellow humans. A repeated theme is how he believes that only those who were privileged in some way (whether healthier to start with or by taking up a job for the nazis at the camp, etc. ) survived the camps and that the true victims died. He states that those were died are the ones who could've truly shared the TRUE experience of being in a concentration camp. Overall, this was a powerful, emotional but important read.

This is a collection of essays about the questions that writing about the Holocaust raises. It was written 40 years after his book If This Is a Man. He seems to be dispairing that the Holocaust may be forgotten, or worse, replicated. He addresses the reasons why some managed to survive, and how their survivors' guilt affected the rest of their lives; why some prisoners became collaborators, and how memories are individual and changeable. It is an extremely intelligent and provocative read that was appropriate to finish on Holocaust Memorial Day.

A powerful collection of essays relating to the author's experience as a concentration camp prisoner 40 years prior. The book addresses the motivations and behaviors of some of the prisoners in their efforts to survive.

Given the 40 years that passed since the events of the earlier books, this has a more detached and restrained tone and it lacks their painful immediacy. The issues explored are interesting, such as the question of how certain people managed to survive, the experience of survivors guilt and shame, and the reactions of readers in Germany to his books. As someone who has studied languages, I was particularly interested in the essay on communication, which focuses on the jargon of the Lager and the impact that linguistic ability (for example, understanding some German) could have on survival.
I found this less compelling and emotionally impactful than the memoirs, but still worth reading for the clarity of ideas and the practical challenges contained within the intellectual ideas.

One of the few non-fiction books on the list and perhaps the only one that is not memoir? But I may be wrong about that.

4.5/5 stars
The third book in the Auschwitz trilogy. The author, a survivor, committed suicide at 68 one year after its publication. This book looks at society 40 years after the Holocaust. Given that the author committed suicide you can see the darkness in its pages. Focusing on humans who do the inhumane, an important story told from first person knowledge but not for the faint of heart. I could only handle one chapter a day due to the seriousness of the matter. Primo Levi is told by a religious friend that one of the reasons he survived is to bear witness which is one of the reasons he wrote his books. I can tell that he takes this responsibility seriously and he still has guilt for surviving.