Goodreads Authors/Readers discussion
Young Adult Fiction
>
What's missing in YA fiction? What are your pet peeves?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
R.A.
(new)
Nov 18, 2014 08:46AM

reply
|
flag


I second everything Joanne said.




And yep, I definitely agree that the best way to work flaws naturally into a story is to show em through actions, situations and dialogue. NOT through a confessional statement by the character, heavy handedly drawing direct attention to em.






Tammy's point is linked in to characters as well. It is always about the characters. Basic plot lines are the same and have been for centuries (Think of all the different variations of Romeo and Juliet), it is the characters that make the stories different from one another (or not).

You have an interesting and overlooked point. Perhaps the YA has lost its humorous side and has leaned too much to the romantic angst side of things which might appeal to young women, but not young men.


Me too. I grew up reading funny and intelligent sci-fi, which is what I now write. The books I remember fondly are the ones that made me smile. Well-written humour is hard to find.

I've read a few books that paint a protagonist trying to be quirky and humorous, and it comes off as the author painfully trying to convince us their character is those things, rather than actually achieving that goal. They're trying for an "adorkable" Anna (Frozen) character, but it comes off more like a Mary Sue Frankenstein monster.
I agree that the humor has to be done intelligently, or else you run the risk of alienating readers who don't trust you or your characters yet.

I've read a few books that paint a protagonist trying to be quirky and hu..."
No one should ever have to be described as funny. Or kind, or mean, or pompous, for that matter. :)

I am not ridiculing this reading choice - I just don't understand it. I'm very curious to know what makes YA books attractive to adult readers.


Obviously YA books are an easier read and a lower reading level than more sophisticated fiction targeted at adults. Just as Middle Grade is easier again and a lower reading level than YA. These categories are established to put the style and content at the appropriate reading level for the targeted audience.
I understand the reduced chance of erotica or explicit content but most novels containing erotica are very clearly categorized as such. I would think this would not be a dominate factor in adults choosing to read YA.
It doesn't really answer my question. I asked "...Is this an indication of the reading level of our society. Is there another reason so many YA readers are adults." I'm trying to find a acceptable reason for this trend besides a preference for easy reads, full of simple answers and instant gratification.

That is an interesting question that might have a complex answer. If reading scores on standardized tests are true, then you might be looking at the reading level of many in the society. Perhaps it is the maturity level of society that is to blame.
However, it might simply be the adult reader has a fondness for that author or series. For instance, I still occasionally read YA books and I can assure you my reading level is way above the YA threshold. The series "Thirst" by Christopher Pike is an example of that. I first read it as a teenager under the "Last Vampire" title. When I heard about a new "Thirst" book, I had to read it simply because I loved the character and the story too much to let it go just because I was an "adult". There are other times that the title or blurb just seemed interesting to me.
These are only my opinions. Others can jump in with their own.

Another explanation could simply be that YA fiction has boomed in popularity in recent years, with many popular titles now being transformed into movies (thus grabbing the attention of even more adults), and so the market goes from 15% YA books to 35% in a short number of years*.
A more abstract reason could be that with the recent economic and political downturns (these have been recovering, but people still feel sluggish about them), it's entirely reasonable to think that adults might want a book that is easy to digest, that doesn't require a large commitment of energy to have returns of good vibes and easy answers.
And if we're avoiding reader preferences, then let me suggest one last possibility: lingering bad taste. Not a bad taste in books, but bad memories associated with the books. High school was a stressful time for a lot of now-adults, and that was precisely the time that we were force-fed The Great Gatsby and The Catcher in the Rye. Judging by the success of sites like Cliff's Notes, I'm guessing a lot of high schoolers thought trudging through these "adult literary classics" wasn't worth their time, and that memory still persists.
*Numbers are totally made-up.

I am not ri..."
Christine, your question is of no relevance to Tammy's original post. Perhaps should have created a new thread for it rather than hijacking this one.
To answer your question, though: No, I don't consider the popularity of YA fiction with adult (notice the absence of quotation marks there, because, seriously: Why?) readers to be of any indication of the reading level of our society. No more so than the popularity of the horror genre can be considered an indication of society's mental state.
Your comment seems to insinuate all adult fiction is sophisticated...far from the case. And that all YA is dumbed down and of lesser literary value...again, far from the case. I've read some truly outstanding YA, and some appallingly poor adult fiction. The genre and target audience of a book are of no reflection on its writing quality, complexity or worth.
Yes, YA books focus on characters in the 16-20 age bracket, and on age appropriate/ relevant content. Lower reading level, though? Often not the case. Issues covered are no less tough. And, anyway, by the time many readers reach this age bracket, their reading ability and comprehension level would rival that of a more mature reader.
I predominantly read YA because I write YA (important to understand your market and all that). But, then again, I write YA because I enjoy reading YA so much.
Teen years are a time of huge change, emotional development and fresh experiences. It's been proven (some study...I think...pretty sure) that teens feel things on a whole different crazy, volatile level what with all the raging hormones; small things can feel life or death, and love/hate are at their extremities. And yet, those things adults are likely to question and doubt, and be cynical or suspicious of, teens have retained enough youthful curiosity to be accepting and open minded about (like 'oh, so you're a vampire/ angel/ demon? awesome'). YA's give huge scope for exploration, and -from a writers perspective- all those dramatic emotions are super fun to work with and manipulate.
YA should not be dismissed off hand. It has as much to offer older readers as younger.

This whole thread is great, and I'm pleased I dropped in. Things I hate in YA fiction- names that give away huge plot points (people named Caine who turn out to be the main character's brother, names that mysteriously reflect superpowers the character doesn't know they have yet) foreshadowing that is really obvious so the element of surprise disappears. Unrealistically fast development of romantic relationships. Lack of romantic exploration. How many people do you know who met their partner at 14 and stayed with them for the rest of their lives?
If you guys are interested, I'd love to give you a free copy of my recently released novella. (in exchange for review) SLAM It's a YASF where I've tried to avoid all the things you've all been talking about!

I totally agree. Certainly some YA is lower level, but I tend to avoid those. Lately I've been reading a mix of YA and adult, and haven't seen a noticeable difference in reading level. I am drawn to YA titles because they usually are cleaner than adult. Too often I'm reading an adult book and BAM, people start taking their clothes off and I end up skipping pages.
And I like what Thomas said, too. I personally get tired of long descriptions and page after page of introspection. Does this make my reading level lower? I don't think so. I was reading adult books when I was ten. It just means that I want to be entertained when I'm reading for entertainment. Most of the adult books I read also shy away from needless information, but they tend to have more. But I guess this is becoming a post about what I wish were different in adult, not YA. Sorry.
But I could add excessive swearing and sexual content to the 'what I don't like in YA' list, since it is sometimes there and I don't like it. I will drop points in my review when a YA book has too much, fair or not.

1. Clumsy girls
2. "Bad" boys
3. Instalove
4. Spoiled brats
5. Cardboard characters
What's missing?
1. Intelligence (shown, not told)
2. NICE love interests
3. Healthy relationships
4. Ugly main characters (who don't get makeovers and become beautiful)
5. Subtlety

1. Clumsy girls
2. "Bad" boys
3. Instalove
4. Spoiled brats
5. Cardboard characters
What's missing?
1. Intelligence (shown, not told)
2. NICE love interests
3. Healthy relationshi..."
Yes! And in addition to #4 Ugly main characters, she can't just THINK she's ugly but really she's gorgeous. Also, I hate when the 'bad' characters are particularly unattractive. I've noticed that several times, even in books like Divergent.

Are they about young adults? That tends to be an identifying factor.

Gail, about anything can be classified YA if it features teenagers as main characters. I'm not saying I agree with that, but it's what I'm seeing out there now.

1. Clumsy girls
2. "Bad" boys
3. Instalove
4. Spoiled brats
5. Cardboard characters
What's missing?
1. Intelligence (shown, not told)
2. NICE love interests
3. Healthy relationshi..."
I have to agree with a lot of your peeves. There's a lot of "bad boys" main character/love interests out there that makes me cringe sometimes. I don't necessarily think it is good when the "hero" treats the heroine like crap.

I have noticed that a lot too. Are they always described as being extremely beautiful/ gorgeous by other characters even though they think they are so ugly?
I think there is a place for that kind of side plot, but I think most of the time the deeper reasoning is lacking. I have written about a character who has a twisted way of looking at herself (not necessarily really fashion model pretty) but nice looking but sees herself as ugly due to abuse she has suffered. She has to relearn how she really is.
I also agree there is a lack of characters who really have physical deformities or are simply not attractive.

In the case of abuse, it is different, but I think we have to be careful not to throw abuse in for a convenient plot crutch. And there I have another pet peeve, though in my experience it tends to be in romance more than YA. I did read this one YA that was completely build on an incident of sexual abuse and failed miserably... but done right, a history of abuse can be a relatable theme since so many young people (and adults) are abused in some way.


Joanne - It was not my intention to insinuate anything, to highjack this thread, or to upset you in any way. I was curious - that's all. The trend is gaining momentum and as a writer, I only wanted to understand it. I approached the avid YA readers in this thread because I felt they could give me real insights into their reading preference. My sincere apologies.
Thank you to all for your comments and insights.


I could not agree more. If an author decides to use abuse in a storyline, it has to be done right. Having it in the story "just because" is not helpful to anyone.

You are welcome. I hope it gave you some insight into what you were trying to figure out. :)

Tammy, you have a great point. Those types of stories get to me as well. I think it sends young people the wrong message when that type of behavior is condoned or even encouraged in books geared towards that age group.

Amen. Women have enough trouble without seeing their supposed lack of worth in their books, too.