Books, Blogs, Authors and More discussion
Bookish Discussions
>
Character names important?
date
newest »


Consider detective names in crime dramas. They often have no more than two syllables and are often European in origin. (i.e. Jack Cooper, Dillon Black, Blake Rodgers) I don't know if those are actual names from books, but they all could be names of hard nose PI's or FBI agents. Kid often have names that end with a "Y" (Billy, Suzy, Becky), Moms have simple name (Betty, Sue, Donna, Mary) where as woman with sex appeal might have a name that stays on the tongue longer (Susanna, Alexandra, Clementine). If it is important to reflect a given culture, than you would focus on names from that region.
From time to time I got to the internet and look at list of names until I find one that is a good fit.

Also the time frame of the book! If their doing a historical them I think it should be fitting to that time. :)

Even at their worst-chosen: they won't sink-the-ship if everything else in the story is GREAT.
When the story itself is leaky--full of cracks and holes--only *then* does a reader notice that yes, 'character-names' were also weird, or bad.
So: concentrate on crafting a solid narrative, and in that case you can get away with almost any character-name you wish.

For example, the main character in my novella is "Hathor" who is known today as ancient Egyptian goddess.
But, also, I think names we choose for our characters add tone to what we write. My story wouldn't have done well if I used "Rick" "Joe" "Bob" "Don" or "Dave". I had to choose/create names that were consistent with the setting. Same goes for the voice of our characters.




Upside, people in a weird way may relate to the character or feel they can better adapt if the name of the character is their own of of someone they know.
Downside, a common name sometimes comes off as a lack of creativity and a common sounding name doesn't always give the reader drive. They think what makes this "Sarah" any different from the last one I read.

Strange/unfamiliar names in science fiction, fantasy, and stories involving foreign countries and characters are expected and acceptable.
When writing historical fiction, the author should perform at least cursory research to confirm that the names of the various characters were commonly used and would not be considered out of place for the specific time period.
Other than the above examples, the author may use any name which he/she feels best suits the character. Occasional poetic license is also acceptable, at the discretion of the author. Parents do not seek the permission of others when choosing their children's name. An author is not required to seek permission from others when choosing a name for their characters. However, sound advice should never be dismissed out of hand.



It doesn't ruin the book for me, but it makes me laugh.

I am not saying that a Mabel cannot be a plucky heroine, but sometimes when names go bad, they go really bad.Judith Krantz had a character in Scruples Two, a descendant of the Russian nobility: Princess Lenina. Yes, like the revolutionary.
My pet peeve is the legion of Alexandras. There was a run on historical fiction heroines who rebelled against the narrow constraints of the female condition of their time. All of them seemed to have red hair, a penchant for the healing arts, and were too skinny for the beauty standards of the era. And yes, all of them were Alexandras.

For me, the pronunciation of a name should be provided somewhere in the book if the author is going for the unique one of kind name. Nothing's worst then going through the book butchering the name! Ha :)
I've also read in other discussions readers don't favor the abbreviations on some names?
Example sarah = rah