The Fault in Our Stars
discussion
who would rather see Hazel die than Augustus?( spoiler warning* for some people)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Grace
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Oct 15, 2014 04:18PM
I would rather hazel die than Augustus!! Am i the only one????
reply
|
flag
I hate to say it but it made sense that she should have died before Augustus. She was sicker and he was in remission. I was very sad when he died and how he died.
I think they both deserved to live. But since Hazel was writing the story, it made since that she would not die. However, a good character must die, so I think that Augustus had to die (kind of). Like in If I Stay (SPOILER) Teddy dies and in The Hunger Games (SPOILER) Rue and Prim both die. Great characters must die in order for a feeling and strong passionate love for the book in my opinion.
Hahaha kind of. I feel that way Missy Maddie. Though, I would rather like for Augustus to die really, and not Hazel. WEll in short, for my opinion, someone has to die for a good movie to come. But I really like the plot goes on. It's like, as they say, the whole book is a poem.
yah I kind of would of. sorry Hazel! but if I were to write this book I would of had them both die. But I really feel that John Green really pulled off Gus dyeing.
Em wrote: "yah I kind of would of. sorry Hazel! but if I were to write this book I would of had them both die. But I really feel that John Green really pulled off Gus dyeing."yah true
first thing i thought hazel would die.
I liked how the story ends and I wouldn't change a thing. Neither of them deserved to die but one of the did. Gus died to end the story with Hazel finding out what happend in the book.
We wouldn't know how Augustus would react to Haze's death, perhaps the end would be more heartbreaking with Hazel dying witnessing Augustus trying to live with the pain of her gone. Augustus has an unconditional love for Hazel, how could/would he move on?
Doesn't Hazel die a year after the book ends anyway? I was perfectly happy with Augustus's death- I wasn't crying or anything, but it was a fine plot point. It wouldn't have worked as well if Hazel died, especially since it's written in first person.
Honestly if Augustus hadn't died, I might have left the book a little happier. It was so predictable that he was going to die. It would have been great if they did all the stuff leading up to Gus dying and then BAM! Hazel dies instead! That would have been much better. No one would have expected that... Also...how great would it have been if the narrator, Hazel, like in 'an imperial affliction' had died, unable to finish the story... parallels... yes. I'm not just saying this because I love Augustus Waters, because actually I don't really care for him at all.
Brittany wrote: "Honestly if Augustus hadn't died, I might have left the book a little happier. It was so predictable that he was going to die. It would have been great if they did all the stuff leading up to Gus d..."I was kind of hoping that it would end the same way, mid sentence...
Maria wrote: "Brittany wrote: "Honestly if Augustus hadn't died, I might have left the book a little happier. It was so predictable that he was going to die. It would have been great if they did all the stuff le..."That would have been interesting, heartbreaking, and less cliche than the end of the book.
I expected Hazel to die not Gus. What you are telling me now is that when you first met Gus you knew he was going to die. Did you know that his cancer came back in the begining of the book. No! His death was unexpected until you found out his cancer came back.
As Trinity commented above, I thought Hazel would die. However, someone spoiled Augustus' death for me.
When most people started to read the book they thought Hazel was going to die. But it was Gus. It wasn't expected that he was going to die in the begining of the book. So it is not a cliche ending.
Extremely bad form in the spoiler in your post title. Some people may not have read the book yet. (you can tell who they are--they are the happy people).
♥♡ Missy Maddie ♡♥ wrote: "I think they both deserved to live. But since Hazel was writing the story, it made since that she would not die. However, a good character must die, so I think that Augustus had to die (kind of). L..."you are absolutely right!!
It's not about whether either Hazel or Augustus "deserves" to live. Everyone deserves to live simply because they are human, but everyone dies eventually anyway. It just so happened that Augustus died at a younger age than most people. But I think it is necessary in a sense that Augustus dies because the story is about Hazel and her life which happens to involve cancer. Gus' remission and death helped Hazel to understand how her parents would feel about her own death among other things. And I know this may sound cruel or cliché but it was part of her journey and how her character developed. Augustus' death is essential to the book.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic




