The Sword and Laser discussion
What's in the tree?
date
newest »


For me, I just couldn't finish Cloud Atlas. I got the impression that the author wanted to play at writing genre fiction, but lacked any experience with it. So he just started throwing in tropes because that's all he knew. Kind of like how Star Trek: Into Darkness had a lot of references to the franchise (especially Wrath of Khan), but the writers didn't seem to understand what they were referencing.

Needless to say, this is somewhat alienating. I tend to want a new category of SF called "Conceptual SF" or something. But then I think, dammit, it's already called "SCIENCE Fiction", and I'm not the one in the wrong here. Or, in great words of Michael Bolton from Office Space, "No way. Why should I change? He's the one who sucks."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADgS_...

THIS! Asimov is cold? Niven characterless? Phooey! Gimme that kind of writing every day and twice on Sunday!

Besides having a real science focus shouldn't have to exclude having interesting characters.

There are a bunch of novels people love that I can't enjoy, but they do not fit the analogy of this thread. These are the discworld books and the hitchhikers books. With these, I can see what is in the tree, but am not in the right position to appreciated them, perhaps? I love the discworld games (even reading the booklet that came with one of the games had me giggling) and the tv adaptations have been great. I loved the tv version of hitchhikers, and recognise, and am amused by any references I may catch in conversation etc. It's just that my mind does not (will not) appreciate that kind of humour in the shape of a novel. I will recognise the joke, appreciate the joke (a cow genetically engineered to WANT to be eaten = brilliant!) but the story gets lost in the silliness, and I find myself not giving a damn what happens to any of the characters. Maybe this would be okay if the jokes actually made me laugh, but they more make me nod my head and think 'yes, that is an amusing detail'. They just don't effect me like they should do in this format. I sometimes wonder if I'd like them better in audio format. Maybe I'd get a better view of what is in the tree in that way.
Books mentioned in this topic
Quicksilver (other topics)Quicksilver (other topics)
Seed (other topics)
Bird Box (other topics)
Outlander (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
John Scalzi (other topics)Alastair Reynolds (other topics)
Only Audible purchase I never finished."
And that's only 1/3 of the print edition. I gave up on the book 120 pages from the end.