Reading 1001 discussion

This topic is about
Bel-Ami
1001 book reviews
>
Bel-Ami - de Maupassant
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Kristel
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Sep 01, 2019 04:16AM

reply
|
flag

Like Kristel, I was entertained by George's social climbing/plotting, but the book didn't resonate with me on a deeper more profound emotional or intellectual angle. I was also left wondering what the intent from the author was, perhaps wasn't listening close enough to make it clear, but I felt it was ambiguous on whether he was getting across that society really does cater to the scheming (not really condemned or condoned in the book imo), or whether he was trying to make a commentary on those who are social climbers, or a society that enables cons, or both.
Considering the moral character of many "self made" current billionaires, I suppose it is rather true to life that George never gets his comeuppance.

I really enjoyed this story about an unapologetic social-climber in 19th century Paris. I love de Maupassant, and this is one of my favorites by him. I did expect him to get his comeuppance, as Amanda mentioned, but that didn't happen.

This was great fun - Bel-Ami’s cynicism is jaw-dropping and he is so unpleasant, but also so much a product of the society he seeks to conquer. Maupassant’s detailed and objective style works well to document the various episodes that build into Bel-Ami’s career, from the journalists playing cup and ball in the office to the glittering social events and drives through the Bois de Boulogne.
There are a range of great and memorable characters - the ailing news editor and his cynical colleagues, scheming financiers and louche politicians, mistresses and wives, and Georges’ sullen peasant parents - but the ghastly Georges is the greatest and most memorable of all of them.

4 stars.