Boxall's 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die discussion

This topic is about
Quo Vadis
1001 Monthly Group Read
>
August {2019} Discussion -- QUO VADIS by Henryk Sienkiewicz
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Charity
(new)
-
added it
Aug 15, 2019 10:12AM

reply
|
flag

When I first read what this book was about, I was very excited to start it. I love reading about times long past, and this appeared that it was going to be a good one. Then I read a few reviews that claimed it was overly religious and I worried about that a bit because I don't subscribe to much of what organized religion has to say.
As it turned out, I needn't have worried. While it was definitely written in a way that villainized the Roman way of life and exalted living a life bathed in Christ's love, it was not overly preachy.
I found the subject matter to be very interesting. Being raised a Christian and having been subjected to all the New Testament stories, it was interesting to see it from a Roman's perspective. Growing up, I never really understood the importance of Rome in the Jerusalem area. Over the years, I started to understand how Rome expanded and then it all made sense, but reading this book put that even more into prospective. Also, knowing that Rome now is the Catholic HQ made this even more interesting contemplating all the changes that this city of antiquity has gone through.
It's definitely a love story wrapped up in historical fiction. Not just love between people, but love in general. Love was a central theme that needed to grow from almost nothing. At least the kind of love that was needed to save humanity from ruin.
I have to say though, that the history was my favorite part. I love a good historical fiction. I love to try to put myself into the era and imagine how things were. That was the part of this book that had the most appeal to me.
As it turned out, I needn't have worried. While it was definitely written in a way that villainized the Roman way of life and exalted living a life bathed in Christ's love, it was not overly preachy.
I found the subject matter to be very interesting. Being raised a Christian and having been subjected to all the New Testament stories, it was interesting to see it from a Roman's perspective. Growing up, I never really understood the importance of Rome in the Jerusalem area. Over the years, I started to understand how Rome expanded and then it all made sense, but reading this book put that even more into prospective. Also, knowing that Rome now is the Catholic HQ made this even more interesting contemplating all the changes that this city of antiquity has gone through.
It's definitely a love story wrapped up in historical fiction. Not just love between people, but love in general. Love was a central theme that needed to grow from almost nothing. At least the kind of love that was needed to save humanity from ruin.
I have to say though, that the history was my favorite part. I love a good historical fiction. I love to try to put myself into the era and imagine how things were. That was the part of this book that had the most appeal to me.
I got an early start on it and finished it about a week ago, via the audiobook. I thought the reader was extremely good. It's remarkable how well this historical fiction holds up after more than a hundred years. I did think it went on a little too long in parts.
I also had concerns that it was written with an agenda of proselytizing Christianity, but I did not find it to do so in an aggressive way at all.
I certainly learned more about the Roman empire and the early years of Christianity. I recently read Memoirs of Hadrian and it was a very good complement to that- I enjoyed reading Quo Vadis more.
I also had concerns that it was written with an agenda of proselytizing Christianity, but I did not find it to do so in an aggressive way at all.
I certainly learned more about the Roman empire and the early years of Christianity. I recently read Memoirs of Hadrian and it was a very good complement to that- I enjoyed reading Quo Vadis more.

I loved that even though the main characters were fictional, the plot is heavily steeped in historical events from the reign of Nero (including the burning of Rome, Nero's suicide, the death of Petronius etc), and early Christian doctrine. I was also impressed with the level of research the author did into ancient Roman society- like his descriptions of the specifics of the Gladiatorial games for example.
There were still a couple things that were ahistorical (I mean, it is historical fiction, so no big deal), but overall I thought it was a great window into understanding a turning point in European history.

The other list book that this one reminded me the most of was Ben-Hur, which I also really liked despite a lack of interest in Christian preaching.
Amanda wrote: "The other list book that this one reminded me the most of was Ben-Hur, which I also really liked despite a lack of interest in Christian preaching.."
I thought frequently about Ben-Hur and that time period while reading this book. I have to admit to never having read Ben-Hur nor even ever seeing that movie. I only found out recently that it was heavy in Christian preaching. It was only after that when I realized that, yes, Ben-Hur IS played heavily during the Easter season.... who knew? Everybody apparently! Ha!
I am looking forward to both of those other books now.
I thought frequently about Ben-Hur and that time period while reading this book. I have to admit to never having read Ben-Hur nor even ever seeing that movie. I only found out recently that it was heavy in Christian preaching. It was only after that when I realized that, yes, Ben-Hur IS played heavily during the Easter season.... who knew? Everybody apparently! Ha!
I am looking forward to both of those other books now.
I forgot to comment in my note of yesterday about the extreme violence in the later part of Quo Vadis. As they say here in Utah, "OH MY HECK!" It's as extreme as a lot of novels and memoirs about war and the Holocaust, probably more than in Schindler's list. I'm fortunately not planning to read any of those type books for a while; I try to avoid overdosing on violence.

That's very true...the last third of the book was VERY graphic and gruesome. I wasn't angry about it and thought it was appropriate given the theme, but given the tone of the book until the martyrdom section, I wasn't -as we millennials say- "expecting it to go that hard".



Thanks for those suggestions. I love Roman/Greek history so I will check out Great Courses and the BBC series.
Tim wrote: "I thought Quo Vadis? was an excellent book. I learned a lot about the time...and the fact that absolute power corrupts absolutely (a quote from Einstein, I believe)..."
Actually an older quotation, from the 19th century British politician Lord Acton. If he hadn't said it probably someone would have eventually, seems to be a lot of truth to it. Hadrian was a fairly benevolent Roman emperor though.
Actually an older quotation, from the 19th century British politician Lord Acton. If he hadn't said it probably someone would have eventually, seems to be a lot of truth to it. Hadrian was a fairly benevolent Roman emperor though.


I loved the book and that ending (before the epilogue) was perfect! Although I REALLY would have loved to read of Nero's reaction to that letter. Really a pleasure to read once the story got going. I'm an atheist but still found this really interesting.