2025 Reading Challenge discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
ARCHIVE 2019
>
The Long Way to a Small, Angry Planet (Wayfarers #1)
date
newest »


I downloaded to my Overdrive app so why not add me to the list please. Is this planned as july book 2 august book 3?



Hard to pick a favourite character, I'm going to hide the rest of this post as spoilers but there isn't really any spoilers in what I've written, it's just in case anyone reading this wants to know nothing whatsoever! (view spoiler)



I agree with you regarding the characters! Although now that I am further along I also (view spoiler)

I will do my best to read #2 in July and #3 in August. I'm thrilled to have an additional reason to continue and finish the series! :)



Actually, (view spoiler)


I actually found it a refreshing change from the "blood and guts" kind of science fiction. To me, what "happened" was the building of a family, albeit one completely unrelated to genetics.
In fact, I think the idea of "family" might be the common thread running through all three books in the series, which otherwise can be read as stand-alones.


I, for one, did not have any such thought cross my mind. I took it as just one of many examples in the book of imaginatively differing societies and ways of thinking.

Yes, I really appreciated that aspect of the book. The idea that different species on different planets with different evolutionary histories would naturally have very different ways of thinking doesn't always come through in science fiction, and I tend to find it a little irksome when different species are presented as more or less human except that they have XYZ. So I'm glad it didn't happen here.

Hmmm...I'm curious enough to go back and reread this to see if I felt the same way. I don't remember...

Also, didn't they lay eggs? Can you abort an egg?

Oh, I didn't mean it like that. I was talking about was the apparent Andrisk idea that while children have the potential to develop into adults with their own relationships with others and the ability to make valuable contributions to society, having the potential is not the same as actually having the ability.
What this could translate into is the idea that the embryo has the potential to develop into someone "more" and perhaps become "more of a person" as it continued to develop, and that might influence how we see the interests of the (fully-developed) woman involved.


"Can you play with me now?"
"But I want it!!"
"Whyyyyyyyyyyyyyy?"

"Can you play with me now?"
"But I want it!!"
"Whyyyyyyyyyyyyyy?""
Me too. And one in which people don't try to impose their children on others.
I never said I disagreed with Andrisk ideas...

With that many opportunities for reproduction, a nonchalant attitude towards offspring would be helpful.
Come to think of it, the whole idea of an r-selected sentient species is interesting, and I've never seen it done before. While I certainly wouldn't argue the Andrisk species is fully r-selected, they would seem to fall a bit more toward that end of the spectrum than a K-selected species. If they evolved from an r-selected species, that would explain a lot.
Can you tell I'm a biologist? ;-)

K-selected: few offspring, heavy investment of parental resources.
r-selected: many offspring, low investment of parental resources.


Yes, I wondered about reproductive compatibility too, and whether a human-Andrisk individual could result. I don't think any hybrid individuals appeared in the series, and I don't know if that's because they're biologically impossible (i.e., the species are just too genetically and/or anatomically different to make it work) or if there's some other reason.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
I am currently reading Alex White's The Salvagers trilogy which will make for a nice comparison to this series, I think (space opera, ragtag underdog spaceship crew, LGBTQ-friendly).