NetGalley Addicts Support Group discussion
Need Help? [Ask the Group]
>
Submitting a review

It's usually only non-book items that get that notice, since Amazon believes the reviewer is associated with the product's maker or seller, or was given a free or discounted item. Amazon no longer allows reviews for free or discounted items, unless they are ARCs.
Is it possible you are reviewing ARCs, but not stating you got the book for free, as you are suppose to state? Or . . . and sorry to ask this . . . is it possible you have written reviews in the past that you were paid money to write?
Maybe other UK reviewers are getting that notice, too, and it simply has something to do with reviewers outside of the US?




Sorry, Sheila, I don't have any input on your question, but I was curious why NG would recommend not saying you reviewed an ARC. I also follow quite a few authors on Twitter, but I certainly don't 'know them', I just like the book I read & have posted reviews on Amazon without issue(so far).


Renee. I seem to have deleted the email from NG about the wording of ARC but they thought it might be the wording.

Yes, stating NetGalley and the publisher should be enough, but Amazon does not always have knowledgeable people checking reviews. It might be that a computer or human checker is only looking for the terms "ARC" or "free". Of course, there are plenty of ARC reviews that were posted that don't have those two terms, but, once again, don't expect Amazon to always handle things in a fair or intelligent manner. It's unfortunately wishful thinking to expect that.




Yep what I always have done, unless I forget to update with the link. When I submit my review I always add "will post to public media upon publication" and even if I forget to link the review it doesn't seem to affect my approvals :)



Don't be too hopeful, though. Amazon has obviously greatly reduced the time and manpower it gives to review problems. The last time I e-mailed about a problem, the first two reps did not fully understand the problem; the third one understood it completely, but still did not resolve the issue; and the fourth rep totally did not understand anything. I gave up.
Also, in another thread, UK reviewers mentioned they could no longer review at Amazon US because they did not meet the new minimum $50 purchase requirement. (See the guidelines.) Have you? If not, that may be the real reason your reviews aren't posting.


Good to bring up that $50.00 minimum purchase requirement because I never knew that was a requirement. It's not a problem for me because I buy so much from Amazon but I don't think it's fair that you should have to buy something from them to post a review. But it is a private business so I guess they can make their own rules ??

That's good to hear and thanks for posting it. I knew it wasn't a matter of greed, but did not know they made exceptions for NG reviewers.
Dorie, it's probably not a problem with any US NG reviewer, but the UK ones were complaining because they had spent at least that much at AmazonUK, but, of course, had made no purchases at AmazonUS. I just got three Amazon deliveries this weekend. :)

Hi Sheila,
Thanks so much for your patience, and for sharing this with me. With Amazon's recent review guideline updates, I think certain words in a review probably send a flag to Amazon (specifically "in exchange for"). I think you could still mention where/how you received the galley, but just alter the wording a bit so, to Amazon, it doesn't sound like you've been incentivized to leave a review. I hope that helps!
Director, Community Engagement

This is the response I got from Amazon
We cannot share any further information, and we may not reply to further emails about this issue.

I don't make money from my reviews as they seem to imply. Have you ever seen the standard required in a review to make money?!!! I'm nowhere near nor would I be interested.


Got it!

Go ahead and try again, though, and keep trying as long as someone still responds. Or you can send your complaints about being falsely accused to Jeff Bezos at jeff@amazon.com
I do wish you luck. You'll need it dealing with Amazon about reviews. (:

I'm wondering, are you still able to order products from Amazon, or haven't you tried? Just curious


When I have had a couple of problems with Amazon I don't bother with the chat line or e mail. I Googled their customer service number and used that. It took me a while to find it, they like you to use the chat :(


05:22 PM BST Sam: Hello Sheila, I am sorry to hear that you are not able to leave a review. Which item are you trying to leave a review for?
05:23 PM BST S Easson: Mainly books but I was trying to review goods I bought last week and the same notice comes up.
05:25 PM BST Sam: Okay, as it has come up with the same error message for each review, we do have a specialist team who will be able to help you with this. I will forward on this information to them and they will respond to you through email

Hi Sheila, may be a totally different issue but this may help. When I click on the Amazon link in NetGalley it takes me to the Amazon US site rather than the UK site. Since about two months ago Amazon has imposed a $50 per annum spending minimum on the site (presumably to stop autobots) and therefore as a UK-based reviewer I can no longer post reviews to the US site. I didn't get the same message as you, just a constant error message whenever I tried to post a review, although I can happily post the same review to the UK site.



No, they didn't respond. I went on Chat a week later (10 days ago)to ask for further advice which was promised and ignored. No PR

Check out your Profile to ensure the box marked REVIEWS is checked.

No, they didn't respond. I went on Chat a week later (10 days ago)to ask for further advice which was promised and ignore..."
How weird is this? I just went on amazon.co.uk and it accepted my review after weeks of refusing them.

No, I don't think a password change would have anything to do with the situation . . . as far as I know.

No, I don't think a password change would have anything to do with the situation . . . as far as I know."
Ditto. Sounds like a coincidence to me too.

Edited to add that I have stopped putting any reference to NetGalley in my reviews since I’m sure misunderstanding about that was where the problem arose.

never given an explanation.



Awhile back, Amazon erected a prominent message saying they were no longer accepting book reviews from unverifiable sources, and I flipped out a bit and wrote to NG's help page. I received an email from NG saying that Amazon had been contacted, and that Amazon actually was fine with NG reviews, because that is a verifiable source. And sure enough, my posts always go up--though they don't let me include the link to my blog, and if I used any blue language, including inside a quote, they won't post it until I take it out.
I am not sure what if any distinction is made for UK reviewers. I am in Seattle, and so have never encountered the problems you have mentioned.
Sorry, we are unable to accept your review of this product.
Your previous review of this product did not comply with our Customer Reviews Guidelines. Amazon does not permit reviews from customers whose relationship to the product or seller may be perceived as biased.
This notice keeps happening and hardly seems fair to authors if I'm unable to spread the word about their books. Anyone explain why this keeps happening?