Support for Indie Authors discussion
Writers Workshop
>
Writing a book series, what do most do?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Mason
(last edited Jun 01, 2018 10:59AM)
(new)
Jun 01, 2018 10:55AM

reply
|
flag

I am still in progress with book one (beta soon) but when I was between drafts, I worked on book two already and at his point, I am touching the early book three. This approach has one advantage: you can check continuity and even make changes that have overlaps between the books.
Then, I might not be an example to follow. I started in 2015 and the books are to be around 700 pages each, by my best guess. So in my case, it's definitely going to be a break around one year in length if everything goes well now (the beginning was the hardest, learning everything myself on the go).
Then, I might not be an example to follow. I started in 2015 and the books are to be around 700 pages each, by my best guess. So in my case, it's definitely going to be a break around one year in length if everything goes well now (the beginning was the hardest, learning everything myself on the go).


If I'm starting something new, however, and I'm not sure how it will be received, then I might start with just one and see how it goes before writing the next few.
I think that good point might be to look at what's common in your genre (which you did not specify). In my case (fantasy), longer gaps for longer books are something that happens. If your genre is favoring shorter books released with shorter breaks, then it might be the way to go.


But really, it depends. Detective novels normally tackle 1 or 2 cases within a book and the cases are concluded. What happens in a later book often has little impact on what was written before.
But if you're writing fantasy and creating a totally new world, it may take you as the author time to have the world fully fleshed out in which case, you discover as you write the subsequent books and will appreciate being able to go back and enhance the earlier books.
So it's first about your genre then about the kind of story you are writing, whether what happens in the earlier books impact the later ones.
That said, at one point, it's time to "let go" and live with the first book and move on. Going back to fix a previous book to solve a problem encountered later can become a big rewrite, like a small ripple having an impact on a lot of things that come later.
Release a book as you're comfortable "living with" what you've written in it.

I plan to have the series pretty much finished before I publish the 2nd book, partly because I want to make sure that the second book can be changed if necessary based on how the third unfolds, but mostly as I want to have the third book out on pre-order the same day the 2nd book is released. This may not be the right strategy for everyone but I like the idea that people can buy the third as soon as they finish the 2nd, while I still have a bit of time to be doing final proof-reading on the third while it is in pre-order.

The big problem with this approach is how to remember all the details so that different books don't contradict each other.


So part of the books have the second in the series almost done with the third outlined. They will all be loosely based on the same town with characters crossing paths in other books. That’s why 15 books being held, I’ve gone back to change who meets who when some of the characters seem to rewrite their fate sometimes.
I have a 16th book I’m going to push through to the end (for an erotica series that’s only like 600 to 800 pages) then go back and split it when it’s done.
I have a temperament where I get about finished with the first story line and maybe an eighth into the second and I will have three good story ideas that have crossed my mind and are filed away and waiting it’s turn. So I’ll take a break after wrapping up one book, to start another waiting book thought.
Seems that when I go back to finish book two of the first book’s series the break from those characters did me good. But that’s erotica not a 1000 page novel. Still if you have 5 books at 200 pages each, well you get it. I am real happy with the answers given so far and I feel this has helped others too. So on that THANKS EVERYONE! You have helped me lean toward dropping more part one books incase one of them really catches interest and I need to quickly devote more time to that series or character. I love writing, it’s like chess where you tell the same battle from the pawn and the rook’s point of view...


I wrote a 7-book series that I released over a time period of 18 months from the first book to the last. Unfortunately, the last book took me the longest to release--9 full months after the previous book was published. Once the last book was out, it sold well with new readers...but comparing its sales numbers to the book released previous shows how much it suffered because of the 9 month gap. I would not personally wait 6 months or a year unless absolutely necessary. 1 month in between releases would be more ideal imo.



If your readers like the first then they’ll come back for book two no matter when it comes out, as long as they’re aware of the release.


On the trilogy I wrote while traveling, I decided to wait to release the first one until I had all three written. Ended up being a good decision as the last lady gave me fits. I'm also one who attempts to get the books in the best shape possible prior to publishing, so I needed to have them at least written before putting out the first book. I'd be like William, writing two series, if I was faster in getting them revised and edited, as I get bored with characters easily which is the reason I like writing trilogies or a stand alone series you can do as the situations for your characters arise. Because I write novels of 200 pages or more, it does take more time to write, edit and publish. My shortest book is just over 50K words.


Me? I'm erratic. I work in many projects at the same time, whenever I want to work in each. I am very used to deadlines so I can still complete them if needed. (I am sure this approach must be quite bad for people with a different, non-erratic personality. But for me it's perfect).
Also, people's expectations on release dates would not be the same if you write novellas or 100,000 words novels, I presume?

You may also want to have a beta reader for your genre.



Also, from romance to mystery, are you having any trouble, you know, switching from writing from the heart to the head? I wrote mysteries as action base of some of my future romances, but they are quite simple.

Also, from romance to mystery, are you having any trouble, you know, switching from wri..."
Actually, no! I thought I would, but I think initially I wanted to write books with more umph like mystery, but wanted to start soft. (Not trying to degrade romance here, but let's face it, the plots aren't super complicated.) Mostly I just wanted to see if I could actually finish a book, and then go from there.
I'm particularly enjoying all the psychology and the extra character details I have to make sure I include to make it work.
So, your mysteries ended, but your character stories, did they keep going through your series?

Oh, no, what I mean is, I have one romance series and in the future stories (that I am already writing) I wrote some simple mystery as base. The characters are all detectives so it's fitting.


Not sure if it belongs here but now that I am thinking in a bit more detail how I want my WIP to end (specifically, the second half of #3), I realized that it'll not be easy to avoid what happened in Paolini's Inheritance where it takes something 10% of the book to close off all the (back)story threads. It's not a bad thing to see questions answered and matters resolved but when I look at the book's comments and question, some people obviously don't feel like going through all of it when the threat is ended.
I'll most likely think about what could be pre-prepared (what the hell did I just write?) during the build-up so it takes less space to close off. I'll try to make it fit the way I write: having some borders that define the direction but letting the flow decide the specific course. It's one of the main reasons I started early work on #3 despite being just one (hopefully) revision short of beta for #1...
And of course, I am glad I joined you and can see and learn from what the others share about their writing process.
I'll most likely think about what could be pre-prepared (what the hell did I just write?) during the build-up so it takes less space to close off. I'll try to make it fit the way I write: having some borders that define the direction but letting the flow decide the specific course. It's one of the main reasons I started early work on #3 despite being just one (hopefully) revision short of beta for #1...
And of course, I am glad I joined you and can see and learn from what the others share about their writing process.

But as Philip said earlier in this thread, there is a lot to be gained from going back and tweaking things. I re-edited the first book after finishing the third to make sure the voice and tone were both consistent as well as to reference a few minor features I wanted to foreshadow a little earlier than I’d originally anticipated.
Finally my Beta readers wanted to get a sense of the whole trilogy and I needed them to sign off on it before publishing.

In my third series, I've gotten better at plotting and planning, and I've got the entire thing line out from start to finish - and I feel so prepared!
It's really a manner of how you write - I am a planner. I like to have the end-goal in sight before I hit the gas too hard and fast.