The Mystery, Crime, and Thriller Group discussion

This topic is about
Suspect
Group Read Discussions
>
June 2018 Group Read Spoiler Thread - Suspect by Michael Robotham
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Bill
(new)
-
added it
May 29, 2018 05:57PM

reply
|
flag

If not, stop, drop and roll.
No, I mean Stop and and turn around. Go to the other thread for this book.
If yes, what did you think overall?
What did you think of the first scene in the book. Why do you think the author started with that?


YES! That's exactly how I felt!
I really liked him. I liked the fact that he could be humble and vulnerable. I like it when he did somewhat unpopular things like having training sessions to help prostitutes stay safe.
I was getting mad at him too. (I think I said "Stupid" out loud while I was reading. I always laugh at my husband for yelling at people on TV, so he thought it was funny.)
I really understand that when you're stressed out, it distorts your thinking. He was a professor, so he's used to being able to take a lot of time to think deeply about narrow things He's just not used to this kind of action.
At one point I thought - Hey, you think you're a profiler but you missed the clues that there was a second unsub! (I watched too many episodes of Criminal Minds.) He knew his profile of the killer didn't match the person he thought was responsible, but it didn't occur to him there could be two people acting together.
I loved how the author built up the details of the early case with the social workers, and all the steps and people involved in a case when when sexual abuse is alleged. That was pretty interesting and heartbreaking.

I felt sad about the creepy things his "friend" did. What a slime ball! But he sort of redeemed himself, and there was an explanation of sorts.



Oh Oh -This is the spoiler thread, so don't read any of these posts. There is another thread you can post on instead.

I got that as well from the descriptions that he makes of himself. He seems to feel that what is happening to him is almost a punishment. When his father made comments about him, you could almost visualize him going back and forth with himself; Wanting to say one thing, but instead deciding on the less aggressive.


I think Joe's therapist skills are coming into play when he weighs his words carefully. I liked the part when the father finally came clean about his real feelings. He was a jerk of a father, and he would have been a lousy psychologist, but he loved Joe and Joe loves him.

I didn't see it as low self-esteem, I saw it as humility and empathy. But I do think that people who go into psychology often 1) want to help others, and 2) are trying to find some answers for themselves.

Lenny was the one accused of abuse, right? I agree that the boy's mother was negligent and awful. The boy's father seemed decent. It's really sad that an accusation like that would be believed without the victim confirming it. I hated the way he died though. I don't think a person could actually do that to himself (the letters on his chest) without passing out first.


That's awful. I imagine the investigation alone could be traumatic. When my kids were little, the nation was all up in arms about a day care center and some really outrageous charges against them. Much later they were found to be false, but their lives were damaged. Someone took what a child said and twisted it to make it sound sinister, and then it snowballed until kids were just nodding to hysterical adults. The kids were so young, they didn't understand any of it. With older kids who do understand, you have to give the kid the benefit of the doubt above anyone else.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McMarti...


I agree with that. I like the emotional waves. I think one reason that he appeals to me is that he's a real person. He shows empathy, he shows bravery, he shows weakness, he gets scared, he figures things out, he makes mistakes, he runs, and he loves people. He's not a cop or a detective and he didn't do all the things that we as mystery readers know he should. This was his first case, and presumably he gets much better as he gets more experience. (Based on the reviews for future books, I think this is probably true. I knew this in advance so that may have increased my overall confidence in him.)
I took a break from mysteries for a few years because I got tired of some of the unrealistic characters. Like the Sherlock types who figure everything out in a minute, or the Jack Reacher types who can win a gunfight with 40 armed bad guys. I like cases that show me something new, or with characters who develop in interesting ways over time.
So this isn't a perfect book by any means, but it was a fun read and I cared about the characters.

Thank you, yes. Finished the book last nite and yes, I was satisfied with the outcome.

I felt so sorry for Lenny.

I reviewed it at the time, so rather than clutter up the thread, I'll just add the link here.
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

Thanks Randy that's the one. I'll see if memory matched the case.

I really do want to see what happens in the next book, and I hope to see continued growth in all quarters. I really enjoyed the book. It gave me a break from more serious books, so I'm game for more.
Does anyone else plan to read one or more of the books in the series?

Nice review! Did you find him to very different between book 1 and 6 that you read? We thought he did a few foolish things in this book.

If he ever takes her for granted, he's an idiot. That kid is a pistol too.
I read it a month ago and I can't remember what happened to the sleazy friend. I still .have the book, so I'll reread the last two chapters

Nice review! Did you find him to very different between book 1 and 6 that you read? We thought he did a few foolish thines"
I'm afraid I read #6 too long ago to be able to compare very well, but re-reading my review, I think what carries through is his distress that he can figure out why people sometimes do awful things. He'd rather not know.
I didn't know Joe's history, but I think Book six, Say You're Sorry was probably true to his character and personality. (That's why I write reviews - to help remind me!)
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
I really do need to read the rest of them. I have his latest coming up this month, The Secrets She Keeps, but I think it's a standalone, and not part of Joe's series.

I agree that reviews are a nice reminder. I've get to develop a better habit of writing reviews. Sometimes I'll talk a lot about a book on a discussion thread, but forget to write a review, or just put it off too long to remember what I wanted to say! I read the current book (Killers of the flower...) a month ago and still need to write the review, and post some comments here.

I agree that reviews are a nice re..."
Even if you don't feel like writing for publication, so to speak, if you make a few notes when reading a real book or copy the notes out of your ebook reader into a document, they will remind you just for yourself. That's what I do before I write reviews, and it helps me remember what struck me at the time I read something.

I am still reading this, but nearing the end, and YES, I adore Joe, and I am amazed by his fortitude; struggling through mud and puddles, falling, struggling to run, and he is constantly covered with mud. I love his father now~

What an apt description of Joe: he is very human, and seriously, very brave, too. He sees himself as a victim because of the Parkinson's Disease, but in reality he is heroic. I am at the cusp of denouement, though; uncertain if it is Jock or Bobby or both.

Jock?

I will also continue with this author!

Robotham said in an interview that if he'd known Joe would be so popular, he probably wouldn't have saddled him with Parkinson's. But once he'd given it to him, he could hardly overlook it in all the subsequent books.

Oh no. I don't suppose it can go into remission or stop progressing for 10 years.
Some seemingly small decisions can come back to haunt an author. I remember when Sue Grafton decided to space each book only a few months apart in Kinsey's world. A year might pass in our time, but only 2 months for Kinsey. As a result, Kinsey was stuck using the same old methods (like a poster board) and never got to to make use of computers, online databases, and all sorts of other methods. It also seemed to us like she was going years between flirtations, relationships, or other life changes, so her life seemed one dimensional and stagnant It was a decision that made me lose interest in the series .

I adore Sue Grafton, Nancy, and I have all her books except for X, Y and Z ( but I think others have written them--sob). I used to spend a great deal of time looking for Grafton to slip up ( modern technology)--believe it or not, she does and did several times, too.
Books mentioned in this topic
Say You're Sorry (other topics)The Secrets She Keeps (other topics)
Authors mentioned in this topic
Michael Robotham (other topics)Michael Robotham (other topics)
Michael Robotham (other topics)