Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
Serieses!
>
Change both books to primary
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Emy
(last edited Apr 24, 2018 05:21AM)
(new)
Apr 24, 2018 05:20AM

reply
|
flag

I think the confusing note is from a previous series numbering that's been changed. The Rules of Magic is actually a prequel, and had originally been numbered 0, which as a prequel wouldn't receive a primary work designation within the series. I'm not sure why it's now numbered 1 in the series.

Is it better to have as 0 and 1 (with a BIG note in the general Notes field), or leave as 1 and 2? I'm torn because usually when there's a 0, there are more books in the series so that it's obvious it's a prequel novel. Here, because there are (currently?) only the two works, it LOOKS like an error.

Is it better to have as 0 and 1 (with a BIG note i..."
I'm not sure either. The change log for the actual book shows the "0" designation being changed/removed; it's pretty obviously a prequel, and it was published after Practical Magic. It doesn't make a lot of sense to me to designate it as number 1 when it's not, but that's just me.


That solution makes sense to me.
Books mentioned in this topic
Practical Magic (other topics)The Rules of Magic (other topics)