2-3-4 Challenge Book Discussions #1 discussion

This topic is about At Close Range

5 views

At Close Range > Question D

Comments Showing 1-3 of 3 (3 new) post a comment »

date

newest »

message 1: by Jonetta (new) - rated it 4 stars

Feb 23, 2018 06:01AM

Mod

Scott inserted himself in the investigation. Do you blame him? Was he instrumental in solving the case?

reply | flag

message 2: by Charlene (new) - rated it 4 stars

Feb 23, 2018 08:40AM

Charlene (charlenethestickler) | 1392 comments

If he was truly innocent (which he was), and his fingerprints were on the gun, I think he could not help but get involved to clear himself.

reply | flag

message 3: by Jonetta (last edited Feb 23, 2018 03:40PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Feb 23, 2018 03:37PM

Mod

Since they made him the number one suspect based on flimsy evidence, Scott really didn’t have much of a choice.

I’m not sure they would have solved the case as quickly as they did without his help. He figured out how his fingerprints got on the gun and traced the scheme back to Doern. That opened up everything.

reply | flag