Horror Aficionados discussion
Novels
>
Why do you read books based on real life crimes?
date
newest »

If you are talking about True Crime books, or, like The Girl Next Door, which is a novelization of a true crime, I read them for the knowledge they offer, to defend myself and my loved ones from the freaks who commit horrible acts against innocent people. One has to accept that a portion of the human race is dangerous and needs to be put down. Keeping that in mind is simply a tool for survival.
There is no pleasure in it, save that the ones responsible have been brought to some form of justice.
There is no pleasure in it, save that the ones responsible have been brought to some form of justice.

Bill wrote: "While the events that take place in such stories some may deem sick, they are still as much a part of the human condition as love, or revenge or tragedy or redemption. A lot of the time it is not s..."
Well said, Bill.
Well said, Bill.

Of course, I could just be a sick bastard who likes true crime stories. Definitely a possibility.

Concerning true crime, I think it's a travesty to ignore the victims in these stories, and that's one reason I post such horrid news stories about child/animal abuse and neglect on FB, because I don't think the victims should be ignored or forgotten. Their deaths are not some dirty secret that should be whispered about or not mentioned until it all goes away. No doubt there are some sickos out there who themselves love to cause human suffering and that's why they read these books and news stories, but that's not why I do it.
I also love following the steps that good, dedicated men and women in the law enforcement/judicial field took to profile, catch, and try these miserable cretins of society. And it's always a pleasure to find out how much time they'll serve for their hideous crimes.


Wow, Bill! Very well said!

I especially loved books written by profilers, most especially Robert Ressler and John Douglas. I loved to hear about how profiling came about, how accurate it can be (or not be),how it has been used in the past, how it can be used in the future; all with an eye towards recognizing signs early enough to possibly prevent a killer/criminal in the early stages.
Problem is reading this stuff is very depressing and rarely do any of the stories we hear about have a happy ending.
We never know if somewhere someone has used one of the techniques to recognize and prevent someone from becoming a killer or criminal. In that light, I got pretty tired of reading most TC and rarely read it now.

I couldn't have explained it any better, well said!

Just recently I read an article about a couple (girl 18, guy 24) who answered an ad for Craigslist sex exchange. While this was extremely stupid and risky, it was extremely sad to find out they have been murdered. Girl was 8 months pregnant.
I avoid anything, especially books that have woman abuse, child abuse, or pet abuse. It makes me uncomfortable. However, I do find it a bit pleasurable when I see guy guy getting a nice dose of justice. There was a news article recently out where a guy beat the crap out of a guy who was molesting his kid. He was not charged. Now that's justice.


With actual true crime non-fiction, I rarely read it because I get bored with how the details are laid out. The crime itself isn't boring, but the filler and the way it's presented dryly is.
I read it because it is the most powerful example of how a certain way of thinking is a complete failure in reality.
People walk through life with blinders.
People walk through life with blinders.

There are a few excellent true crime authors. Ann Rule, Carlton Stowers, Gregg Olsen, Jack Olsen, Joseph Wambaugh.....
Basically, a true crime book should be the news, from crime to conviction, from fact to opinion piece, local color, family dynamic, and an overview of crime detection, prevention and the law at work, pass or fail, in a fair and balanced manner. Certain parts will make you sick, and they should. Certain parts will make you angry, and they should. Those are the things you need to hold on to, and act on. Because to make the horrors stop, your anger must be focused on the failings of the system.
Basically, a true crime book should be the news, from crime to conviction, from fact to opinion piece, local color, family dynamic, and an overview of crime detection, prevention and the law at work, pass or fail, in a fair and balanced manner. Certain parts will make you sick, and they should. Certain parts will make you angry, and they should. Those are the things you need to hold on to, and act on. Because to make the horrors stop, your anger must be focused on the failings of the system.

Basically, a true crime book should be the news, from crime to conviction, fro..."
Well said, Jon! I second the mention of Jack Olsen as an excellent writer of true crime. I've never once been bored with one of tales. His true crime books are better than a lot of fiction books I've read.

I haven't read many of them, so just may have ended up experiencing some of the duds.



Take for instance The Girl Next Door. I don't know how many of you read it but I personally find it hard to read which is the point. However, by reading it it made me more sick and repulsed than anything else. It was not entertaining. I met people who found books like The Shining by Stephen King to be sick in nature. It was relatively tame compared to The Girl Next Door.
My question is: why do people read these messed up books about real life crimes? Does that bring them some sort of entertainment or pleasure or do you think that people's obsession of death drives them to read these books? Sort of like they could not believe how one person can be so evil and their evil side is fascinating to them because it deviates so much from the norm. Feel free to chime in.