Reading with Style discussion

note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
42 views
Archives > SP 18 RtD Questions

Comments Showing 1-28 of 28 (28 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Kate S (new)

Kate S | 6459 comments Please post any questions about Reading the Decades in this thread.


Elizabeth (Alaska) | 14225 comments We thank Rosemary and Kazen for the inspiration for this challenge.


message 3: by Denise (new)

Denise | 1807 comments A fun subchallenge!

Is it okay to use the same pair of digits for each year, such as 1900, 1911, 1922 etc.? If so, would that pattern qualify for all four finishers bonuses? I have it listed on the Plan thread but want to make sure before I start filling in books.


message 4: by Kate S (new)

Kate S | 6459 comments Denise wrote: "A fun subchallenge!

Is it okay to use the same pair of digits for each year, such as 1900, 1911, 1922 etc.? If so, would that pattern qualify for all four finishers bonuses? I have it listed on th..."


Glad you like it.

To answer your questions, yes and yes.


message 5: by Denise (new)

Denise | 1807 comments Kate S wrote: "Denise wrote: "A fun subchallenge!

Is it okay to use the same pair of digits for each year, such as 1900, 1911, 1922 etc.? If so, would that pattern qualify for all four finishers bonuses? I have ..."


Thanks, Kate. Using the same digits will be less taxing to my poor feeble brain. And no restriction on repeating an author?


message 6: by Kate S (new)

Kate S | 6459 comments Nope, no restrictions on repeating an author for this challenge.


message 7: by Denise (new)

Denise | 1807 comments Kate S wrote: "Nope, no restrictions on repeating an author for this challenge."

Thank you again, just wanted to make sure.


message 8: by Karen Michele (new)

Karen Michele Burns (klibrary) | 5272 comments I really like the twists in the bonuses this time!


message 9: by Kate S (new)

Kate S | 6459 comments Karen Michele wrote: "I really like the twists in the bonuses this time!"

Thanks. It was a fun challenge to build upon. The bones gave us a lot of freedom to promote a more personal experience.


message 10: by Valerie (new)

Valerie Brown | 3265 comments How is zero handled? I was planning: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0.


message 11: by Elizabeth (Alaska) (last edited Feb 10, 2018 01:20PM) (new)

Elizabeth (Alaska) | 14225 comments Valerie wrote: "How is zero handled? I was planning: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0."

Zero is after 9 or before 1. To read "in order" you don't have to start at either end. You could start with some other number and go "around the horn" if you wish.

4, 5, 6, 7, 8. 9. 0, 1, 2, 3 OR

8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0, 9

as examples


message 12: by Valerie (new)

Valerie Brown | 3265 comments Elizabeth (Alaska) wrote: "Valerie wrote: "How is zero handled? I was planning: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0."

Zero is after 9 or before 1. To read "in order" you don't have to start at either end. You could start with some other nu..."


ok, good. Thanks for the speedy answer (I was on tenterhooks!). I thought that was the case, but as always when planning the sub-challenge I mix myself up.


message 13: by Elizabeth (Alaska) (last edited Feb 10, 2018 01:30PM) (new)

Elizabeth (Alaska) | 14225 comments Valerie wrote: "always when planning the sub-challenge I mix myself up. "

And despite what appears to be an easy and straight forward challenge, this one is an easy one to get mixed up on.

I wanted to do both decades and years and found I was duplicating one or the other. I made myself a 10 x 10 grid on a spreadsheet to check myself. AND, I wasn't good enough to be able to get titles with *both* years and decades in order. I'll read one of them in order, but not both, and haven't decided yet on which one.


message 14: by Valerie (new)

Valerie Brown | 3265 comments Elizabeth (Alaska) wrote: "Valerie wrote: "always when planning the sub-challenge I mix myself up. "

And despite what appears to be an easy and straight forward challenge, this one is an easy one to get mixed up on.

I wan..."


Oh yes.... It took 4 tries just to get the numbers right! (never mind any books planned). I tried to to the 'around the horn' but I just couldn't get my head around it.


message 15: by Karen Michele (new)

Karen Michele Burns (klibrary) | 5272 comments I'm thinking of trying:

2018
2007
1996
1985
1974
1963
1952
1941
1930
1929

Or...

2017
2006
1995
1984
1973
1962
1951
1940
1939
1928

Are they correct for decades?


Elizabeth (Alaska) | 14225 comments Karen Michele wrote: "I'm thinking of trying:

2018
2007
1996
1985
1974
1963
1952
1941
1930
1929

Or...

2017
2006
1995
1984
1973
1962
1951
1940
1939
1928

Are they correct for decades?"


yes to both


message 17: by Tien (new)

Tien (tiensblurb) | 3098 comments Thank you, Karen Michele! I was thinking of planning the exact same thing and now I only have to copy & paste lol


message 18: by Karen Michele (new)

Karen Michele Burns (klibrary) | 5272 comments Tien wrote: "Thank you, Karen Michele! I was thinking of planning the exact same thing and now I only have to copy & paste lol"

I'm happy to help:)
I've taken a look at book choices and now the problem is, I like them both! Decisions, decisions...


message 19: by Kazen (new)

Kazen | 623 comments Elizabeth (Alaska) wrote: "We thank Rosemary and Kazen for the inspiration for this challenge."

Rosemary, our idea has been unleashed upon the world! Bwahahahahaha!

~ahem~

Glad to be of service. :)


message 20: by Rosemary (last edited Feb 11, 2018 09:09AM) (new)

Rosemary | 4276 comments Kazen wrote: "Elizabeth (Alaska) wrote: "We thank Rosemary and Kazen for the inspiration for this challenge."

Rosemary, our idea has been unleashed upon the world! Bwahahahahaha!

~ahem~

Glad to be of service. :)"


Me too! I'm sure I didn't think of anything quite this fiendish, though. That must have been your input, Kazen :)


message 21: by Denise (new)

Denise | 1807 comments For an anthology with multiple authors, is the year of publication what counts, even if the stories might have been originally published in different years?


Elizabeth (Alaska) | 14225 comments Denise wrote: "For an anthology with multiple authors, is the year of publication what counts, even if the stories might have been originally published in different years?"

It is the year that shows as the original pub year on GR. Are they recently published stories, or are they oldies?


message 23: by Denise (new)

Denise | 1807 comments Elizabeth (Alaska) wrote: "Denise wrote: "For an anthology with multiple authors, is the year of publication what counts, even if the stories might have been originally published in different years?"

It is the year that sho..."


On the Job: Fiction about Work by Contemporary American Writers by William O'Rourke

I'll have to check each story to know for sure about the original publication date.


message 24: by Elizabeth (Alaska) (last edited Feb 11, 2018 11:39AM) (new)

Elizabeth (Alaska) | 14225 comments Denise wrote: "I'll have to check each story to know for sure about the original publication date. "

Don't worrry about it on this one. The other authors aren't named on the GR record and it's unlikely anyone will change it. Go ahead and use 1977 for this.


message 25: by Denise (new)

Denise | 1807 comments Elizabeth (Alaska) wrote: "Denise wrote: "I'll have to check each story to know for sure about the original publication date. "

Don't worrry about it on this one. The other authors aren't named on the GR record and it's unl..."


Great, thank you.


message 26: by Owlette (new)

Owlette | 709 comments My first book for RtD was going to be Firefly Lane by Kristin Hannah. However, I checked the Lexile score and it is less than 800.

At BPL, it is filed as "tce" and I don't know what that means. Can I use this book for the RtD subchallenge? Thanks.


Elizabeth (Alaska) | 14225 comments Owlette wrote: "My first book for RtD was going to be Firefly Lane by Kristin Hannah. However, I checked the Lexile score and it is less than 800.

At BPL, it is filed as "tce" and I..."


Yes. "Windsor Tce" is the branch of BPL where that book is shelved. There is no YA/Juv designation, so you're good for RtD.


message 28: by Owlette (new)

Owlette | 709 comments Great and a relief! Twenty-three copies in our library, all checked out or on hold until today, when one is coming for me. :)


back to top
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.