Support for Indie Authors discussion
Writing Process & Programs
>
Polarising pieces... your thoughts?
date
newest »


The other thing is feedback. I worry when I write something that I've fed it into the void and no one is ever going to read it. When I'm in this kind of mood, I often add something almost deliberately provocative in hope someone will reply with any reaction at all to confirm to me I haven't burnt out my typing finger for nothing. Anyway, good writing should provoke thought and force people to re-consider their knee-jerk beliefs.



Leave it in if that is what you feel works best because it is your book, and you're the only one who has say over it.

Exactly. Even bad reviews can intrigue the reader and lead them to buy your book. I know I bought some ebooks myself after reading 1-star reviews. Sometimes, one man's trash is another man's gold.
If you feel it's integral to the plot, keep it. That is the beauty of being self-published.

Much appreciated. :)

It's your call really. You are the authority on why it's there in the first place.
I will only add that wishing to avoid controversy is no real reason for excluding something in a book if you feel it's necessary and true to the book's ethos.

It's your call really. You are the authority on why it's there in the first p..."
Yep, good call Micah. Thanks!




as a debut author you are looking for an audience. TRUE As an author you are trying to be true, to yourself, your characters and the emotions of the story. You cannot please everone or even a large majority of people even if you become the "paperback writer" of Beatles fame. You will please no one, including yourself, if you pull away from what, in your judgment, is true.

Many thanks again. :)
I don't care much for books that have no polarizing moments. Do you want a limp, wishy-washy book? Or do you want to be bold?


Agreed - a wishy washy book is a waste of time, but there is a big difference between trying to make people think about something and being insulting to some. That is why I try to bury my messages in the stories. If you want to think, you will easily find them, and if you are not the thinking type, well, they wouldn't be of any interest anyway. Against that, there is the person who would think about the message but misses it. I don't think there is any overall procedure that will work well with everyone.
Ian wrote: "there is a big difference between trying to make people think about something and being insulting to some"
Of course there is. I've done both.
Of course there is. I've done both.


G.G. wrote: "Again guys, I am sure there are some people that actually like limp wishy washy stuff, so no need to judge. :/"
Never said there weren't. It's quite possible some people DO like limp and wishy-washy books. I was asking Neil if that's the kind of book he wants. I thought that was clear. I don't see anywhere where I said no one would read it.
Never said there weren't. It's quite possible some people DO like limp and wishy-washy books. I was asking Neil if that's the kind of book he wants. I thought that was clear. I don't see anywhere where I said no one would read it.
Ian wrote: "I am wondering how you would advertise that. Somehow I can't see anyone putting that in the average description :-)"
I'm tempted to try it. If there's an audience out there for it...
I'm tempted to try it. If there's an audience out there for it...


Good question. Both really. I wanted to make readers think about the effects of drugs, not just on themselves but friends and family... and the type of mindset drug manufacturers and dealers have.. ie they don’t give a sh*t about the user or the consequences (other than profit). But as a means of delivering the message (rather than just an old man lecturing) I wanted to capture the message within an interesting storyline that people would read which included things I’m familiar with/have a passion for... ie the outdoors, fishing, law enforcement environments, survival etc.
I’m actually pleased I included the chapter in question and wouldn’t have it any other way, even if it meant not selling a single copy. I guess as a first timer, I just wasn’t prepared for such contrasting views on it. In hindsight I probably should have been! I posed the question as I was keen to see how other, more seasoned authors, addressed the issue... and whether some authors would ‘take the path of least resistance’. From the feedback it appears most if not all respondents write how they see fit, which is great. Next time I won’t be so surprised (and I’ll keep writing the same way) :)
Really appreciate everyone’s input... especially coming from other authors who no doubt face the same issues!
Cheers
Neil

Agreed - a wishy washy book is a waste of time, but th..."
I agree that diluting a message throughout the book is best: if not, then it could be seen as a case of author filibustering by some readers.

Good question. Both really. I wanted to make readers think about the effects of drugs, not just on themselves but friends and family... and the type of mindset drug manufacturers and d..."
It sounds like you had an important message you wanted to convey through your story. I did, too, and wasn't sure everyone would "get" it, and some might even react poorly to it. I've discovered that some read the story for the basic plot, while others describe it as thought provoking. If anyone has taken offense to it, I haven't yet heard that. I would encourage you to leave it in for the discerning reader who likes to find something important to recognize or think about in what they've read, knowing that some may not apreciate it. It sounds like thats the reader you wrote the book for, as well as yourself. If there are polarized views on how to hang toilet paper, there will be polarized views on anything you write :) Follow your own heart.


Thanks again everyone for your input :)
Cheers
Neil

I say that and yet when my primary reader didn't get something or found it confusing, I was happy to fix it. After all, as the author, I suffer under the curse of knowledge and she doesn't. Moreover, I'm an engineer and I sometimes expect people to understand things that they don't. Some of my readers just skip the technical stuff, others dig in. It's the same with every story, I think.
On the other hand, if I have a bit in there about drowning puppies and she hates it, I may look at doing something different, since that particular scene is only there to move the story along (unless it isn't).
I like the point that art should be polarizing, if by "polarizing" we mean that it should provoke thought and some people are physically allergic to thought. There is no consensus on what art is or should be, much to my surprise.
However, in my opinion, being controversial or "polarizing" simply to be controversial isn't the heart and soul of art. That's more "look at me!" narcissism. Not that there's anything wrong with that.



Precisely. Causing thought, as they turn the pages....or once they finish the book.

That’s always been the hardest part, addressing the topic without preaching. I read a book recently that was controversial, but it felt like I was being lectured. It turned me off from what was a thought provoking premise.


Especially today, it's virtually impossible to be inoffensive. However, per some of the comments above, I'd be more worried about the passage in question 'slowing the pace of the book' rather than it's being controversial. In other recent books I've read, the offensive bits have sometimes moved the plot forward even if I totally disagreed with the author's tone/intentions.


Being a ‘debut’ author and not at all experienced in the worldly ways of writing... I’d really appreciate your thoughts on the following...
One particular chapter in my novel appears to..."
I agree with many replies in this post. It's impossible to please all your readers. Sometimes slowing things down gives the reader a breather and builds anticipation. Sometimes peppering the info throughout the book instead works well, but sometimes the reader misses the important info the author intended when it is peppered. Hard decision. I say, go with your gut. read a few of your type of chapter in some other author's works similar in genre to yours. Is there something they did that you didn't that made the slow but important chapter you are wondering about seem more enticing?
hard call for sure and great discussion question. Thanks for posting it!
At the end of the day, I say, it's your work and if it's just one chapter that you are worried about, don't stress it (unless its the first chapter in the book and is causing readers not to read forward, then you may want to address it).
I love reviews, don't you? ...it helps to grow my writing.
Being a ‘debut’ author and not at all experienced in the worldly ways of writing... I’d really appreciate your thoughts on the following...
One particular chapter in my novel appears to be polarising readers... some readers think it’s one of the highlights of the book, and others would prefer it not to be included. Without giving too much away, the chapter in question slows the pace of the book, although (in my view) helps to paint the background for one of my main and newly introduced characters. The chapter includes discussion on the touchy subject of illicit drug taking (where this particular key character conducts a rather blunt illicit drug presentation to high school students).
Just wondering what the general consensus is out there.... do you as authors shy away from potential polarising issues, or issues that may slow the pace of your stories (FYI mine is a crime fiction thriller)... or do you not mind including potential polarising pieces or pieces that purposely slow the pace?
Personally I’m still very happy including it.. but would be keen to know if you think polarising topics and anything that slows the pace of the story, are things that should be avoided.
Thanks in advance :)