Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Book & Author Page Issues
>
Please delete this book! (pt. 47) [Anyone requests; leave deletions for superlibrarians]

https://www.goodreads.com/work/editio...
And recombine with the main work with same title.

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3...
with this:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3...
The first one has no reviews and the second one has all the reviews and is the same book in spanish.

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2...
then please recombine with
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2...

to be combined back to https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1...

First of all I apologize in advance in case my comment seems offensive or unreasonable (English is only my third language and my writings skills aren't that good).
I know that most if not all of super-librarians are volunteers therefore they're working on our behalf without any economically compensation. But makes me sad that most of the times we make a counterargument on this forum our comment is just ignored.
In my opinion when there's no specific policy on GR about something more than one super should be consulted. I really try to make this site more organized little by little contributing with what I can, but is really frustrating to see a true duplicated (not an ACE, not a tête-bêche edition) of a book on my shelf not being merged.


I've seen your response. When in doubt, or not entirely sure, no edit should be made, especially not merging, as that can't be reverted.
I suggest that you start a new thread, asking for opinions/clarification for this specific example, box set with two sides, as the chance of getting them here is very small. Once there is a consensus reached there, that thread can be used for policy.

#768-769 done
#770 That link is no longer working. I can't find a duplicate.
#771 done
#772 That is a valid Kindle edition. Title corrected and combined.
#773-777 done
#778 That link is no longer working. Looks like someone already recombined.
#779 done
#780 That is a valid edition, only needs to be combined. Combined, after correcting the author.
#781-783 done

Sandra, I didn't state "all of them" because I was thinking about the GR employees who also are super-librarians and as far as I know, technically at least, not volunteers.

I've seen your response. When in doubt, or not entirely sure, no edit should be made, especially not merging, as that can't be reverted.
I suggest that you start a ne..."
Thank you Arenda. I'll start a new thread then.

Sandra, I didn't state "all of them" ..."
I guess so, but I think of them as staff.




Another try. Left a librarian note this time :)
https://www.goodreads.com/work/editio...

https://www.goodreads.com/book/edit/3...
This is a partial entry with missing info but correct ISBN:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/edit/3...
Can you please combine these two? Thank you.


See change log of edition-to-keep prior to merge. I reverted change from January 2012 when amazon data was removed resulting in a bot-added cover. (Discussed here: https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...)

Edition to keep: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4...
Edition to merge: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3...
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
A Slippery Slope (other topics)The Fifth Season (other topics)
Swimming Lessons (other topics)
The Mangler (other topics)
Why China? (other topics)
More...
https://www.goodreads.com/work/editio...
Thank you!